Quasar44
Diamond Member
Many young female workers complained at trial he would harass them
Still the evidence of murder looked spotty
??
Still the evidence of murder looked spotty
??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It’s been long settled. The janitor did it, but due to antisemitism, they pinned it on him. When he was in jail, a bunch of antisemites broke him out and lynched him.Many young female workers complained at trial he would harass them
Still the evidence of murder looked spotty
??
Why would you assume he was guilty? The young boy who witnessed it came forth 70 years later and said, on his deathbed, that he saw the black janitor do it.A Jew who was convicted of murder in Georgia in 1913? We can only assume that he was guilty but he was lynched after his deat sentence was commuted.
Isn't it reasonable to assume every convicted murderer was guilty? The lynching is a different matter. It's possible that prison authorities put vulnerable inmates in a position where they can be killed. Dahmer is a modern example.Why would you assume he was guilty? The young boy who witnessed it came forth 70 years later and said, on his deathbed, that he saw the black janitor do it.
His sentence was commuted to life in prison, and the antisemites wanted him dead.
No, it’s not reasonable. The town was both antisemitic and anti-Yankee, and there was no direct evidence. (That’s because he didn’t do it).Isn't it reasonable to assume every convicted murderer was guilty? The lynching is a different matter. It's possible that prison authorities put vulnerable inmates in a position where they can be killed. Dahmer is a modern example.
Isn't it reasonable to assume every convicted murderer was guilty? The lynching is a different matter. It's possible that prison authorities put vulnerable inmates in a position where they can be killed. Dahmer is a modern example.
Very odd for a yankee Jew to move to 1915 Georgia???The main witness who testified against Frank was Conley - the man that Alonzo Mann, on his deathbed, testified did it.
The antisemitism - always bad - sparked after that, and Jews were threatened to pack up and move out of town.
Another Interesting tidbit was that the sheriff and mayor were among the lynchers, as was the future governor, according to a report.
![]()
'Georgia's shame'
Leo Frank's lynching at the hands of an angry mob stunned Georgia and the nation in 1915. A century later, the case still fuels debate.specials.myajc.com
No direct evidence in a capital case? Perhaps the anger comes from the lynching rather than the conviction.No, it’s not reasonable. The town was both antisemitic and anti-Yankee, and there was no direct evidence. (That’s because he didn’t do it).
As far as prison authorities putting Frank in a position where vigilantes could lynch him, that’s very possible.
Yes, quite odd….not sure why he made that move.Very odd for a yankee Jew to move to 1915 Georgia???
That’s true. It was all circumstantial. The Governor always thought he was innocent and that’s why he commuted the sentence to life in prison.No direct evidence in a capital case? Perhaps the anger comes from the lynching rather than the conviction.
Where did you read that?What about the 21 other harassment complaints from workers
What’s AS?Funny this board has zero AS
Very rare for a Jew to commit this crime
Benny Siegel was notorious for being a serial rapist. Meyer Lansky started out as a gambler and a pimp. Employers and managers harassing female employees was as common as dirt. Jews were up to their necks in the white slavery trade all across the country, and pretty much ran the porn industry for decades. It's probably not all that rare.