- Thread starter
- #41
I have read this theory, and even if it IS true, does that make it ethical?What if it's true...
Greater access to abortion may have reduced America’s crime rate
"May 24, 2019
"Crime rates in the U.S. have fallen by about half since the early 1990s.
"A new working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research finds that legalized abortion following the Supreme Court’s landmark Roe v. Wade decision in 1973 accounts for 45% of the decline in crime rates over the past three decades.
"The paper’s authors, Stanford University economist John Donohue and University of Chicago economist Steve Levitt, take new data and run nearly the same model they used in their influential — and controversial — 2001 analysis published in the Quarterly Journal of Economics, where they first suggested an association between abortion and crime."
New research linking abortion and crime reduction resurfaces old debate
Is it reasonable to hypothesize fewer children born into an environment that puts them at a higher risk of committing crime will constitute a net gain for society?
It would seem logical to believe unwanted children or those whose parents are unable to support them are likelier to become criminals.
Critics of the theory argue the correlations between births and crime don't account for confounding factors like reduced drug use, demographic changes and population densities.
Legalized abortion and crime effect - Wikipedia
As a hypothetical, we have the movie and short story, Minority Report. Is that sort of thing ethical, even if it is efficacious?
Or even the early 20th century's knowledge of genetics, and the idea of eugenics in human societies. Look at what it lead to, the holocaust and planned parenthood.
While we can now argue about the benefits that Planned Parenthood today may offer to women, when it was founded, there really can't be a lot of debate about what it's true purpose was.
Was that ethical? Was that moral?
So that is the warning we have today, to retain our humanity.
If it's true purpose was poverty reduction, Planned Parenthood seems more ethical to me than many of the social programs of a century ago.While we can now argue about the benefits that Planned Parenthood today may offer to women, when it was founded, there really can't be a lot of debate about what it's true purpose was.
Was that ethical? Was that moral?
"The origins of Planned Parenthood date to October 16, 1916, when Margaret Sanger, her sister Ethel Byrne, and Fania Mindell opened the first birth control clinic in the U.S. in the Brownsville section of the New York borough of Brooklyn.[15]
"They distributed birth control, birth control advice, and birth control information.
"All three women were arrested[16][17][18] and jailed for violating provisions of the Comstock Act, accused of distributing obscene materials at the clinic.
"The so-called Brownsville trials brought national attention and support to their cause.
"Sanger and her co-defendants were convicted on misdemeanor charges, which they appealed through two subsequent appeals courts.
"While the convictions were not overturned,[19] the judge who issued the final ruling also modified the law to permit physician-prescribed birth control.
"The women's campaign led to major changes in the laws governing birth control and sex education in the United States.[20]"
Republicans know better.Democrats think dismembering black babies will reduce crime Wow
Wait until the children are ambulatory.