Leftists, why do you support the censorship of opinions you dont agree with?

ever since Rush came on the scene.
Where were you in the 60s and 70s when Joe Pyne and Alan Burke were leading the way for RL to fill.
Mostly listening to the likes of John Lennon, Sly and the Family Stone, Cat Stevens, Stevie Wonder, Bee Gees, etc.

Additionally during those decades I did usually catch some Paul Harvey, Ronald Regan, Larry King on radio along with Pete Franklin's local sports talk show.
 
ever since Rush came on the scene.
Where were you in the 60s and 70s when Joe Pyne and Alan Burke were leading the way for RL to fill.
Mostly listening to the likes of John Lennon, Sly and the Family Stone, Cat Stevens, Stevie Wonder, Bee Gees, etc.

Additionally during those decades I did usually catch some Paul Harvey, Ronald Regan, Larry King on radio along with Pete Franklin's local sports talk show.
I listened to all of those myself. However Joe Pyne was a predecessor to Rush for conservative shock reporting in the 60s, and Alan Burke in the 70's, Pyne was on daytime TV but Burke was on the radio. Both had extremely abrasive personas--made Limbaugh seem wimpy.
 
How does it make the nation stronger? It is very strange to me.

Disagreeing with Modern Gender Theory is a hate crime?
This fails as a strawman fallacy.

The ‘left’ does not advocate for ‘censorship’ – the notion is a lie.
the left is so pro censorship its insane...trump isnt on twitter anymore...inconvenient truth

So, they don't want to publish his lies anymore?
They have the right.
In freedom public decides for itself what are lies. In censorship and oppression the publisher nanny states instead

The public doesn't decide what is truth and what are lies.
Am I commenting right now Sunday morning on 4/11/2011?
The public doesn't get to decide it's actually Tuesday the 13th.
Private companies don't have to publish anything they don't want to.
In a free society like we used to have the public chose what it considered to be true or false. Now publication platforms are making that decision for us very arbitrarily and mostly tied to politics

I find it fascinating that one can say the 2016 election was stolen, but not the 2020 election.

Its overt hypocrisy.
Yea that is a great point
It is equally unproven about the stealing of either election so both comments should carry equal weight and durability but one does not because of politics.
 
The weak libbies don’t want to see or hear truth plus seek someone else to do the elimination dirty work
 
How does it make the nation stronger? It is very strange to me.

Disagreeing with Modern Gender Theory is a hate crime?
This fails as a strawman fallacy.

The ‘left’ does not advocate for ‘censorship’ – the notion is a lie.
the left is so pro censorship its insane...trump isnt on twitter anymore...inconvenient truth

So, they don't want to publish his lies anymore?
They have the right.
In freedom public decides for itself what are lies. In censorship and oppression the publisher nanny states instead

The public doesn't decide what is truth and what are lies.
Am I commenting right now Sunday morning on 4/11/2011?
The public doesn't get to decide it's actually Tuesday the 13th.
Private companies don't have to publish anything they don't want to.
In a free society like we used to have the public chose what it considered to be true or false. Now publication platforms are making that decision for us very arbitrarily and mostly tied to politics

I find it fascinating that one can say the 2016 election was stolen, but not the 2020 election.

Its overt hypocrisy.
Yea that is a great point
It is equally unproven about the stealing of either election so both comments should carry equal weight and durability but one does not because of politics.
How does it make the nation stronger? It is very strange to me.

Disagreeing with Modern Gender Theory is a hate crime?
This fails as a strawman fallacy.

The ‘left’ does not advocate for ‘censorship’ – the notion is a lie.
the left is so pro censorship its insane...trump isnt on twitter anymore...inconvenient truth

So, they don't want to publish his lies anymore?
They have the right.
In freedom public decides for itself what are lies. In censorship and oppression the publisher nanny states instead

The public doesn't decide what is truth and what are lies.
Am I commenting right now Sunday morning on 4/11/2011?
The public doesn't get to decide it's actually Tuesday the 13th.
Private companies don't have to publish anything they don't want to.
In a free society like we used to have the public chose what it considered to be true or false. Now publication platforms are making that decision for us very arbitrarily and mostly tied to politics

You should really get another teacher for gaslighting, the one you have, SUCKS.

The only time the "public' chose what the truth was, was in 1692, during the Salem witch trials.
 
How does it make the nation stronger? It is very strange to me.
I for one do not put up with Democrat censorship.
Disagreeing with Modern Gender Theory is a hate crime?
First, people do not need to have such an inordinate interest in disparaging other people's gender or how they identify or perceive themselves.

Second, there are ancient inviolable principles of international law and human rights that absolutely prohibit sex discrimination, prostitution, and homosexual aggression in housing accomodations, bathing facilities, and the like. People are all together in a mixed group, or else they have individual privacy, as the situation warrants.

Be gone with the sex-segregated public changing rooms at health clubs and swimming pools and commercial restrooms.

It's high time for people to change in their cars or get off the property.
hated following rules at home growing up, in school, sports and the military along with Cub Scouts to Boy Scouts..
The barbershoppery and fraternization of men with men will be punished more severely than Sodom and Gomorrah when it is forced on those who do not identify as male.
Obama was against Gay marriage in 2009, so he is a homophobe and should be cancelled.
Gay marriage as an enforceable contract is inevitably a form of slavery, involuntary servitude, or bondage between a dominant and a subordinate.

It isn't something that needs to be "enforced" in any way, shape, or form by city hall.
But old men perverts can go to the bathroom with little girls now, so.....
So the "dirty old men" had better wash their hands before and after they change the little girls' diapers, and uphold their fair share of childcare. We've heard that hogwash before, and it isn't nice.
 
How does it make the nation stronger? It is very strange to me.

Disagreeing with Modern Gender Theory is a hate crime?
This fails as a strawman fallacy.

The ‘left’ does not advocate for ‘censorship’ – the notion is a lie.
the left is so pro censorship its insane...trump isnt on twitter anymore...inconvenient truth

So, they don't want to publish his lies anymore?
They have the right.
In freedom public decides for itself what are lies. In censorship and oppression the publisher nanny states instead

The public doesn't decide what is truth and what are lies.
Am I commenting right now Sunday morning on 4/11/2011?
The public doesn't get to decide it's actually Tuesday the 13th.
Private companies don't have to publish anything they don't want to.
In a free society like we used to have the public chose what it considered to be true or false. Now publication platforms are making that decision for us very arbitrarily and mostly tied to politics

I find it fascinating that one can say the 2016 election was stolen, but not the 2020 election.

Its overt hypocrisy.
Yea that is a great point
It is equally unproven about the stealing of either election so both comments should carry equal weight and durability but one does not because of politics.
How does it make the nation stronger? It is very strange to me.

Disagreeing with Modern Gender Theory is a hate crime?
This fails as a strawman fallacy.

The ‘left’ does not advocate for ‘censorship’ – the notion is a lie.
the left is so pro censorship its insane...trump isnt on twitter anymore...inconvenient truth

So, they don't want to publish his lies anymore?
They have the right.
In freedom public decides for itself what are lies. In censorship and oppression the publisher nanny states instead

The public doesn't decide what is truth and what are lies.
Am I commenting right now Sunday morning on 4/11/2011?
The public doesn't get to decide it's actually Tuesday the 13th.
Private companies don't have to publish anything they don't want to.
In a free society like we used to have the public chose what it considered to be true or false. Now publication platforms are making that decision for us very arbitrarily and mostly tied to politics

You should really get another teacher for gaslighting, the one you have, SUCKS.

The only time the "public' chose what the truth was, was in 1692, during the Salem witch trials.
They choose every time they vote, moron.
 
How does it make the nation stronger? It is very strange to me.
I DON'T support the censorship of opinions I don't agree with. I do support the removal of lies and unsubstantiated conspiracy theories from social media.
In other words, you support the censorship of opinions you don't agree with. A censor always believes that facts he doesn't agree with are lies or unsubstantiated. Pretty much everything woke turds like you believe is a lie or it's unsubstantiated. Care to have me in charge of making that determination? Eh shit stain?
 
Last edited:
How does it make the nation stronger? It is very strange to me.
I DON'T support the censorship of opinions I don't agree with. I do support the removal of lies and unsubstantiated conspiracy theories from social media.
In other words, you support the censorship of opinions you don't agree with.
Maybe you should become familiar with the difference between the words 'fact' and 'opinion' before you misrepresent what others have said.
 
How does it make the nation stronger? It is very strange to me.
I DON'T support the censorship of opinions I don't agree with. I do support the removal of lies and unsubstantiated conspiracy theories from social media.
In other words, you support the censorship of opinions you don't agree with.
Maybe you should become familiar with the difference between the words 'fact' and 'opinion' before you misrepresent what others have said.
Your understanding of the facts is purely an opinion, moron.
 
President Harry S. Truman wrote in October of 1952, “Socialism is a scare word they have hurled at every advance the people have made in the last 20 years." Socialism is what they called public power.

Socialism is what they called Social Security. Socialism is what they called farm price supports. Socialism is what they called bank deposit insurance. Socialism is what they called the growth of free and independent labor organizations. Socialism is their name for almost anything that helps all of the people.

'Pure Socialism' is terrible as an economic theory. Basically the government owns everything. It stifles growth. It has been shown to be untenable.

However, 'Democratic Socialism' is vastly different. In fact we already have Democratic Socialism in the US. First responders for instance like firefighters, policemen, paramedics, etc., the interstate highway system, public schools, sewer, water, electric power lines, the National Parks system, libraries, the FDA, Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid, Worker’s Comp, anything that has the word “public” in front of it.

These are all…say it with me…SOCIALIST. Basically any services that the government provides to the people are Socialist programs. You pay taxes, the government uses some of that money (not enough) to pay for programs that benefit all Americans.
 
President Harry S. Truman wrote in October of 1952, “Socialism is a scare word they have hurled at every advance the people have made in the last 20 years." Socialism is what they called public power.

Socialism is what they called Social Security. Socialism is what they called farm price supports. Socialism is what they called bank deposit insurance. Socialism is what they called the growth of free and independent labor organizations. Socialism is their name for almost anything that helps all of the people.

'Pure Socialism' is terrible as an economic theory. Basically the government owns everything. It stifles growth. It has been shown to be untenable.

However, 'Democratic Socialism' is vastly different. In fact we already have Democratic Socialism in the US. First responders for instance like firefighters, policemen, paramedics, etc., the interstate highway system, public schools, sewer, water, electric power lines, the National Parks system, libraries, the FDA, Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid, Worker’s Comp, anything that has the word “public” in front of it.

These are all…say it with me…SOCIALIST. Basically any services that the government provides to the people are Socialist programs. You pay taxes, the government uses some of that money (not enough) to pay for programs that benefit all Americans.
Ike was a socialist, you dumbass woke turd.
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top