- Banned
- #341
There is little data on the affects of drug doping for trans'ing. What data there barely goes back to 1990 and depicts serious, negative health consequences.Again, we don't know what happened, because we are only getting Brockman's side of the story, in her rambling legal brief, full of inaccurcies. We don't have the side of her doctors, because they can't reveal what happened thanks to HIPAA.
They've been doing these kinds of therapies since the 1950's. We have plenty of data.
But at least you are being honest and admitting this is about your opposition to transgenderism, and not about any principle of medical misconduct.
There are no groomers.
Her parents were in on the ride every step of the way, as was she.
Sanity is that transgenderism/gender dysphoria is a real thing, and requires real treatment.
You wouldn't tell a clinically depressed person to "Cheer up".
You wouldn't tell an anorexic to "have a sandwich".
But you all think telling a transgender person to Man Up (Or Lady UP) is a solid plan.

Systematic Review of the Long-Term Effects of Transgender Hormone Therapy on Bone Markers and Bone Mineral Density and Their Potential Effects in Implant Therapy
This study seeks to evaluate the long-term effects of pharmacologic therapy on the bone markers and bone mineral density of transgender patients and to provide a basis for understanding its potential implications on therapies involving implant procedures. ...

At least you admit your political ideology is what drives your acceptance for grooming children.
Why would you tell a clinically depressed pre-teen female to "man-up" and then proceed to groom and dope that child with dangerous chemicals followed by mutilating surgeries?