notmyfault2020
Platinum Member
- Oct 7, 2022
- 6,542
- 3,210
- 893
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #61
what's MIL?Not a good definition. Thats viability, not life. My MIL cannot survive on her own. She's definitely alive, and a major pain in the butt.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
what's MIL?Not a good definition. Thats viability, not life. My MIL cannot survive on her own. She's definitely alive, and a major pain in the butt.
Keep murdering babies thinking that is sane.Keep pushing your authoritarianism on women. Keep losing elections.
Keep murdering babies thinking that is sane.
You sure as heck endorse it though dont you?I've never murdered a baby, but thanks for playing.
soul killer?Mother in Law. Also known as: She Who May Not Be Named, Dark Lord of the Abyss, SoulKiller, etc.
You don't think abortion is murder. None of you pro-life groomers do. You're just sad pervy uber-statists who get off on control fantasies.You sure as heck endorse it though dont you?
if you vote for promoters of abortionI've never murdered a baby, but thanks for playing.
You don't think abortion is murder. None of you pro-life groomers do. You're just sad pervy uber-statists who get off on control fantasies.
What, you think it's _not_ obvious?o
I agree that, just like you, I don't think abortion is murder.projection
projectionI agree that, just like you, I don't think abortion is murder.
I'm honest about it. You're lying.
Yes. It is.You don't think abortion is murder.
he's not so much lying as accusingYes. It is.
Or rather, it should be banned as such, the laws need to be changed to punish it as murder.
The age of the deceased target of violence shouldn’t matter.
So stop lying.
Because they don't. It's really not complicated.accusing pro lifers of not REALLY caring about the unborn persons' lives (or rights).
I listed the reasons that pro-lifers lie. I'll list them again.I forget the nefarious reason he says pro lifers REALLY have for wanting to protect life but there is one.. according to him
it is only an imposition on the victim (well, there are always more than one victim but here I refer to the victim of torture and death: the baby)Those who are oblivious to the status-quo-ante are fools.
For the first 200-odd years of the Republic, abortion was a felony in all but a few American jurisdictions. Further, it was a cultural "sin." And this was a time when basically the only reliable methods of birth control were abstention or a rubber. Leftists like to think that abortions went on in huge numbers prior to Roe, and that thousands of women died in botched attempts to abort their own babies, but such cases were extremely rare. Usually an "unwanted pregnancy" was quickly followed by a wedding (a "shotgun" wedding) and a fairly successful marriage.
To suppose that the overturn of RvW (more accurately, Casey v Planned Parenthood) presents an unprecedented imposition of the so-called rights of women is simply stupid. Reproductive acts often result in pregnancy. Deal with it accordingly.
Those who are oblivious to the status-quo-ante are fools.
For the first 200-odd years of the Republic, abortion was a felony in all but a few American jurisdictions.
And one way of doing that is ... abortion. Pro-life control freaks are unable to deal with that, but their issues are their problem.Reproductive acts often result in pregnancy. Deal with it accordingly.
Yeah we do. I certainly do.Because they don't. It's really not complicated.
Incorrect, simplejack. Not employing abstinence isn't abstinence failing. Think better, tool.By definition
EVERY pregnancy is a result of Abstinence failing