Left-Wingers Enter New Depths of Rage Over Supreme Court's Nationwide Injunction Ruling

[AZrailwhale]

After hearing that one party is down and out throughout the decades, it's my belief that voters will give either party in control the boot if the economy is not performing well.

Under normal circumstances I would agree with you. But the Modern Democratic Party has alienated so many voters that in this case, the Republicans have a very deep well of support. That's why I think a new, more moderate party will form, possibly by 2032. To me, the Republicans are very much the lesser of evils, not an ideal party.

 

[AZrailwhale]

If an electable candidate means a candidate with support from the NRA and their sister organization the KKK, I`ll pass.

Give us a break, the KKK hasn't been a factor since the fifties or early sixties and then they supported the Democrats.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

But doesn't any challenge now need to work its way up through the judicial system to get to the Supreme Court? If so, then as the saying goes, justice delayed is justice denied.

Why does there have to be a delay? The courts take their own sweet time reviewing cases they cannot decide now. The appellate process should be very easy. If your court thinks a nationwide order in sin effect, you just pass it to the circuit court and they will pass it to SCOTUS if they agree. It could actually be done in a matter of days.

 

[teddyearp]

Not surprisingly, leftist Supreme court judges are infuriated by the majority ruling connected to district level judges issuing nationwide rulings which are beyond the scope of their jurisdiction.

Bad news for the left as this will limit their practice of "judge shopping" as they try to limit Trump's executive authority.

Left-Wingers Enter New Depths of Rage Over Supreme Court's Nationwide Injunction Ruling

Supreme Court's ruling limits district judges' power, causing outrage among left-wing commentators.

redstate.com

As RedState reported, the Trump administration scored a major victory on Friday after the Supreme Court ruled that district court-level nationwide injunctions exceeded judicial authority. That will throw a wrench into the left-wing strategy of seeking universal relief in a select few left-wing jurisdictions across the country and hopefully return some actual balance to the separation of powers within the U.S. government.

True, but Justice Alito correctly predicted that these rogue judges would just start creating a ton of 'class action' suits out of them without really going by the rules. Which is what they've shopped for these judges for anyways. Judges who think they can rule the country from the bench and they can. Because the ruling gets overturned, but the judge faces no personal consequence.

 

[Rigby5]

Give us a break, the KKK hasn't been a factor since the fifties or early sixties and then they supported the Democrats.

Wrong.
The KKK was actually who are now republicans.
Southern Democrats were always actually republicans ever since the Republicans stopped being the Party of Lincoln in the 1880s.
The Southern Democrats always voted for conservatives, because they were the wealthy elite.
Anyone who does not believe in universal rights it still actually KKK.
Like those who want to abuse immigrants.

 

[Rigby5]

Why does there have to be a delay? The courts take their own sweet time reviewing cases they cannot decide now. The appellate process should be very easy. If your court thinks a nationwide order in sin effect, you just pass it to the circuit court and they will pass it to SCOTUS if they agree. It could actually be done in a matter of days.

That is an argument I agree with, but supports universal injunctions.
And I agree because it prioritized the defense of individual rights, and prevents each state from having different individual rights recognized.

 

[Rigby5]

True, but Justice Alito correctly predicted that these rogue judges would just start creating a ton of 'class action' suits out of them without really going by the rules. Which is what they've shopped for these judges for anyways. Judges who think they can rule the country from the bench and they can. Because the ruling gets overturned, but the judge faces no personal consequence.

The argument of "judge shopping" makes no sense.

First of all, rights are supposed to be paramount so defended by default.
It is the abuse of rights that should have to take the more difficult course.

Second is that if a judge does rule wrongly, it is easily and quickly fixed on appeal.

Third it that without universal injunctions, then each state will have their own sets of rights, which totally undermines the whole republic. Rights are supposed to be inherent, so there is no way they should be able to vary from state to state. So when they do, it emphasis this is not really a republic, and the laws really are just bureaucratic dictates.

Its executive orders that clearly have no legal authority and need constant judicial oversight.

 

[AZrailwhale]

True, but Justice Alito correctly predicted that these rogue judges would just start creating a ton of 'class action' suits out of them without really going by the rules. Which is what they've shopped for these judges for anyways. Judges who think they can rule the country from the bench and they can. Because the ruling gets overturned, but the judge faces no personal consequence.

I have thought for a long time that there should be a quality control measure for judges. Something on the order of five percent of their decisions being overturned by the next judicial level up and they would be fired with no possibility of ever holding a judicial post again at any level. The interval for that five percent would have to be determined. but I think it should be between two and five years. That would be fair to the judge while limiting their ability to do damage to society.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Wrong.
The KKK was actually who are now republicans.
Southern Democrats were always actually republicans ever since the Republicans stopped being the Party of Lincoln in the 1880s.
The Southern Democrats always voted for conservatives, because they were the wealthy elite.
Anyone who does not believe in universal rights it still actually KKK.
Like those who want to abuse immigrants.

As usual wrong.