excalibur
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 18,302
- 34,763
- 2,290
Why? Because that is all they know how to do when things don't go their way.
And the NY Times makes a fool of itself yet again.
The left's usual attempt to smear someone is all it is. The MSM is a joke. For shame.
And the NY Times makes a fool of itself yet again.
The left's usual attempt to smear someone is all it is. The MSM is a joke. For shame.
...
In its promotion of a story on Schroeder, the New York Times highlighted the fact that Schroeder “has acknowledged that some topics raised in pretrial hearings are new to him, and said that until this case, he hadn’t heard of the Proud Boys, which had offered to help Rittenhouse,” despite the fact that the Proud Boys were not involved in the actual shootings themselves. The article similarly criticizes Schroeder for being “unfamiliar with the ‘O.K.’ hand sign as a gesture that has been co-opted by white supremacists.”
The Times piece is also notable for its flawed effort to portray Schroeder as incompetent. It ends by stating that the judge had “improperly allowed evidence” — a letter — to be presented in another murder trial he presided over. In truth, Schroeder had said that the letter could not be used by the prosecution but was overruled by the Wisconsin supreme court. Recently, the state supreme court reversed itself, deciding that Schroeder had been in the right all along.
...
In its promotion of a story on Schroeder, the New York Times highlighted the fact that Schroeder “has acknowledged that some topics raised in pretrial hearings are new to him, and said that until this case, he hadn’t heard of the Proud Boys, which had offered to help Rittenhouse,” despite the fact that the Proud Boys were not involved in the actual shootings themselves. The article similarly criticizes Schroeder for being “unfamiliar with the ‘O.K.’ hand sign as a gesture that has been co-opted by white supremacists.”
The Times piece is also notable for its flawed effort to portray Schroeder as incompetent. It ends by stating that the judge had “improperly allowed evidence” — a letter — to be presented in another murder trial he presided over. In truth, Schroeder had said that the letter could not be used by the prosecution but was overruled by the Wisconsin supreme court. Recently, the state supreme court reversed itself, deciding that Schroeder had been in the right all along.
...
Left-Wing Commentators Rush to Condemn Rittenhouse Judge as Prosecution Flounders | National Review
Some liberal commentators explicitly tarred Schroeder as a racist while others settled for euphemism and innuendo.
www.nationalreview.com