Left-Wing Commentators Rush to Condemn Rittenhouse Judge as Prosecution Flounders

[excalibur]

Why? Because that is all they know how to do when things don't go their way.

And the NY Times makes a fool of itself yet again.

The left's usual attempt to smear someone is all it is. The MSM is a joke. For shame.

...

In its promotion of a story on Schroeder, the New York Times highlighted the fact that Schroeder “has acknowledged that some topics raised in pretrial hearings are new to him, and said that until this case, he hadn’t heard of the Proud Boys, which had offered to help Rittenhouse,” despite the fact that the Proud Boys were not involved in the actual shootings themselves. The article similarly criticizes Schroeder for being “unfamiliar with the ‘O.K.’ hand sign as a gesture that has been co-opted by white supremacists.”

The Times piece is also notable for its flawed effort to portray Schroeder as incompetent. It ends by stating that the judge had “improperly allowed evidence” — a letter — to be presented in another murder trial he presided over. In truth, Schroeder had said that the letter could not be used by the prosecution but was overruled by the Wisconsin supreme court. Recently, the state supreme court reversed itself, deciding that Schroeder had been in the right all along.

...​

Left-Wing Commentators Rush to Condemn Rittenhouse Judge as Prosecution Flounders | National Review

Some liberal commentators explicitly tarred Schroeder as a racist while others settled for euphemism and innuendo.

www.nationalreview.com

 

[Jessica-stormlover]

The left knows that they're in the wrong and have to destroy this young man in order to escape the light of justice.

 

[BULLDOG]

Rittenhouse has already contacted OJ to make arrangements for them to work together to find the real killers.

 

[toobfreak]

And the NY Times makes a fool of itself yet again.

Gee, there is breaking News!

The left's usual attempt to smear someone is all it is. The MSM is a joke. For shame.

All they care about is the story. Printing a story that attracts readers to sell advertising to pay their salary so they can keep printing more bullshit stories.

 

[night_son]

Why? Because that is all they know how to do when things don't go their way.

And the NY Times makes a fool of itself yet again.

The left's usual attempt to smear someone is all it is. The MSM is a joke. For shame.

...​

​

In its promotion of a story on Schroeder, the New York Times highlighted the fact that Schroeder “has acknowledged that some topics raised in pretrial hearings are new to him, and said that until this case, he hadn’t heard of the Proud Boys, which had offered to help Rittenhouse,” despite the fact that the Proud Boys were not involved in the actual shootings themselves. The article similarly criticizes Schroeder for being “unfamiliar with the ‘O.K.’ hand sign as a gesture that has been co-opted by white supremacists.”​

​

The Times piece is also notable for its flawed effort to portray Schroeder as incompetent. It ends by stating that the judge had “improperly allowed evidence” — a letter — to be presented in another murder trial he presided over. In truth, Schroeder had said that the letter could not be used by the prosecution but was overruled by the Wisconsin supreme court. Recently, the state supreme court reversed itself, deciding that Schroeder had been in the right all along.​

​

...​

Left-Wing Commentators Rush to Condemn Rittenhouse Judge as Prosecution Flounders | National Review

Some liberal commentators explicitly tarred Schroeder as a racist while others settled for euphemism and innuendo.

www.nationalreview.com

The establishment must hide from those members of the general public who were not directly effected by the 2020 riots the true scope, severity and barbarism of their violence. Truth be told MORE armed American men should have taken to the streets and shot rioters/terrorists on sight. Tens of thousands of American citizens lost millions, if not billions of dollars of property, while many more were directly threatened by foot soldiers of BLM/Antifa. The establishment needs to sweep the events of the 2020 riots under a rug and out of history's spotlight in order to maintain some degree of eager voter base. Burying Kyle Rittenhouse is key to this end.

 

[MisterBeale]

Rittenhouse has already contacted OJ to make arrangements for them to work together to find the real killers.

 

[pknopp]

I haven't followed the trial but what I've seen of him, he does seem to like to play to the camera. That doesn't make any ruling right or wrong but I have to wonder whether this is how he generally acts in court?

 

[candycorn]

I haven't followed the trial but what I've seen of him, he does seem to like to play to the camera. That doesn't make any ruling right or wrong but I have to wonder whether this is how he generally acts in court?

 

[armadei]

Are you somehow offended by "Asian Food"?

 

[armadei]

I haven't followed the trial but what I've seen of him, he does seem to like to play to the camera. That doesn't make any ruling right or wrong but I have to wonder whether this is how he generally acts in court?

If you "haven't followed the trial" then how in the actual fuck could you claim "he does seem to like to play to the camera"?

 

[LuckyDuck]

The prosecution knew they blew it with Grosskreutz's testimony, hence the prosecution's attorney putting his head down and covering his face with his hand. Between Grosskreutz's testimony and the video, it became a clear case of self-defense for Rittenhouse. Once they knew they blew it, they requested considering reduced sentences. Rittenhouse isn't going to get off scot-free, as the saying goes, but he won't be spending life in prison either.
The absurd death threats the judge and defense teams are dealing with is criminal in itself. The judge doesn't make the decision on the recommended charges and ALL people on trial in the USA are entitled to an attorney and a trial. In this case, the "jury" decides Rittenhouse's fate, not the judge, so threatening him makes zero sense. The jury will decide his guilt or innocence based upon the evidence and the attorney's statements and the judge's determination on what is to happen to Rittenhouse if found guilty, is largely determined by the state's sentencing guidelines.
Personally, Rittenhouse's first kill in self-defense, was Rosenbaum, a child molester. I say, no loss there. Rittenhouse removed from the gene pool, a person who would have created more underage victims in the future.

 

[pknopp]

If you "haven't followed the trial" then how in the actual fuck could you claim "he does seem to like to play to the camera"?

I saw some video of him and he appeared to be playing to the camera. Quite simple.

 

[22lcidw]

Rittenhouse has already contacted OJ to make arrangements for them to work together to find the real killers.

So then we can get a Rosenbaum person with the same history and members of your extended family who are little boys and lock them up in a room for a few weeks giving them food and drink of course and you will not have any problems with it. This individual was not a good person. No matter what you believe of Rittenhouse. Stop backing individuals who are detriments to civility.

 

[Meathead]

Are you somehow offended by "Asian Food"?

We're not allowed to say Asian food now?


\It's getting weirder and weirder.

 

[BULLDOG]

So then we can get a Rosenbaum person with the same history and members of your extended family who are little boys and lock them up in a room for a few weeks giving them food and drink of course and you will not have any problems with it. This individual was not a good person. No matter what you believe of Rittenhouse. Stop backing individuals who are detriments to civility.

So that's how you justify the murders? A 17 year old kid chose that particular night, and that particular street to become a self appointed executioner? So how do you justify the other dead guy, and the third guy Rittenhouse tried to murder?

 

[armadei]

So how do you justify the other dead guy, and the third guy Rittenhouse tried to murder?

The 2nd guy bashed him in the head with a skateboard, the 3rd guy pulled a gun on him. It is well documented on video from multiple angles. You clearly haven't watched a single one of them.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Why? Because that is all they know how to do when things don't go their way.

And the NY Times makes a fool of itself yet again.

The left's usual attempt to smear someone is all it is. The MSM is a joke. For shame.

...​

​

In its promotion of a story on Schroeder, the New York Times highlighted the fact that Schroeder “has acknowledged that some topics raised in pretrial hearings are new to him, and said that until this case, he hadn’t heard of the Proud Boys, which had offered to help Rittenhouse,” despite the fact that the Proud Boys were not involved in the actual shootings themselves. The article similarly criticizes Schroeder for being “unfamiliar with the ‘O.K.’ hand sign as a gesture that has been co-opted by white supremacists.”​

​

The Times piece is also notable for its flawed effort to portray Schroeder as incompetent. It ends by stating that the judge had “improperly allowed evidence” — a letter — to be presented in another murder trial he presided over. In truth, Schroeder had said that the letter could not be used by the prosecution but was overruled by the Wisconsin supreme court. Recently, the state supreme court reversed itself, deciding that Schroeder had been in the right all along.​

​

...​

Left-Wing Commentators Rush to Condemn Rittenhouse Judge as Prosecution Flounders | National Review

Some liberal commentators explicitly tarred Schroeder as a racist while others settled for euphemism and innuendo.

www.nationalreview.com

This is all a George Soros commie effort to make self-defense with a firearm illegal.

We're not fooled.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

So that's how you justify the murders? A 17 year old kid chose that particular night, and that particular street to become a self appointed executioner? So how do you justify the other dead guy, and the third guy Rittenhouse tried to murder?

God, you are a waste of fucking oxygen.

Self-defense with a firearm is a right and if you don't like it...kill yourself.

 

[BULLDOG]

The 2nd guy bashed him in the head with a skateboard, the 3rd guy pulled a gun on him. It is well documented on video from multiple angles. You clearly haven't watched a single one of them.

He was an armed active shooter running down the road from the first guy he killed. What did you expect?

 

[Crepitus]

Why? Because that is all they know how to do when things don't go their way.

And the NY Times makes a fool of itself yet again.

The left's usual attempt to smear someone is all it is. The MSM is a joke. For shame.

...​

​

In its promotion of a story on Schroeder, the New York Times highlighted the fact that Schroeder “has acknowledged that some topics raised in pretrial hearings are new to him, and said that until this case, he hadn’t heard of the Proud Boys, which had offered to help Rittenhouse,” despite the fact that the Proud Boys were not involved in the actual shootings themselves. The article similarly criticizes Schroeder for being “unfamiliar with the ‘O.K.’ hand sign as a gesture that has been co-opted by white supremacists.”​

​

The Times piece is also notable for its flawed effort to portray Schroeder as incompetent. It ends by stating that the judge had “improperly allowed evidence” — a letter — to be presented in another murder trial he presided over. In truth, Schroeder had said that the letter could not be used by the prosecution but was overruled by the Wisconsin supreme court. Recently, the state supreme court reversed itself, deciding that Schroeder had been in the right all along.​

​

...​

Left-Wing Commentators Rush to Condemn Rittenhouse Judge as Prosecution Flounders | National Review

Some liberal commentators explicitly tarred Schroeder as a racist while others settled for euphemism and innuendo.

www.nationalreview.com

The trial is a sham. The opposite of a kangaroo court. It is nothing but a means of acquitting a murderer.