Law Professor Condemns Nancy Pelosi


Point of order...

You cannot "think" this "impeachment" is legal.

You might "believe" it is, if you're the sort of vacuous parrot that also believes in MMGW, Santa Marx, and that "journalists" are "unbiased" (unless they work of Fox).

If you're a cognizant adult and have any real knowledge of what is legal or not then you know this is a shit show and that the Epstein Story is what people should REALLY want to get hammered out into the public.


.

If you are a cognizant adult then you realize it is a legal impeachment. Only Trump fools believe it is not.
 
You think lawlessness bothers Dem's in congress, NOT! These lowlife swine break the very laws they pass on a daily basis.

Trump is the only one who is lawless here. He uses the Constitution for toilet paper in a bid to be come a authoritarian.
 
Why give Trump a pass?

What crime do you want to charge Trump with? Do you need to see any proof or is your dislike of him good enough for you to have him incarcerated?
 
Trump is the only one who is lawless here. He uses the Constitution for toilet paper in a bid to be come a authoritarian.

What was his crime? Was it "using the constitution as toilet paper" when Obama used the IRS to prevent conservative groups from participating in the 2012 election?
 
Easy too find people willing to condemn Anyone for political gain, truth not necessary.
 
Why give Trump a pass?
What crime do you want to charge Trump with? Do you need to see any proof or is your dislike of him good enough for you to have him incarcerated?
You know what the allegations are, abuse of power, using his office for political gain. Don't pretend that Trump isn't in deep doo-doo.
 
OJ was innocent of murder. He was tried and acquitted by a jury of his peers. That's the way we do things in America. Do most people think he did it? Hell yes! Does that matter? Hell no!
No one gets declared innocent. The verdict was 'not guilty". That being said, what does it have to do with Dershowitz being a well-paid mouthpiece willing to say anything, as long as the amount is right?
 
You know what the allegations are, abuse of power, using his office for political gain. Don't pretend that Trump isn't in deep doo-doo.

I'm not aware of Trump having committed any crime. What crime do you want to charge him with?
 
No one gets declared innocent. The verdict was 'not guilty". That being said, what does it have to do with Dershowitz being a well-paid mouthpiece willing to say anything, as long as the amount is right?

What statement did Dershowitz make that was unreasonable or erroneous?
 
OJ was innocent of murder. He was tried and acquitted by a jury of his peers. That's the way we do things in America. Do most people think he did it? Hell yes! Does that matter? Hell no!
No one gets declared innocent. The verdict was 'not guilty". That being said, what does it have to do with Dershowitz being a well-paid mouthpiece willing to say anything, as long as the amount is right?

You should answer that question yourself if you are that smart... which you are obviously not.
 
...and Bill Clinton never had sex with that woman.......
He beat the rap, haha. I don't think Oranjesus is going to be as lucky, no matter what you cucks think.
Sez the lamest political fruitcake of all time. :rolleyes:
 
15th post
You think lawlessness bothers Dem's in congress, NOT! These lowlife swine break the very laws they pass on a daily basis.
You're too sensitive. Have the Trumpkins turned into pajama boys?

I'm sorry we were busy running the country and stacking the SCOTUS with conservatives, what? Oh snap! :21:
 
You think lawlessness bothers Dem's in congress, NOT! These lowlife swine break the very laws they pass on a daily basis.
You're too sensitive. Have the Trumpkins turned into pajama boys?
Talk about a cuck.
75464170_10157752360398011_4383939364602773504_n.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom