Last Month Of Open Uncensored Internet? Obama Set To Hand Over Internet To NWO Globalists...

[HappyJoy]

Of course, everyone cares about the Constitution we just disagree in it's interpretation, don't be an idiot.

Really?!? You're going to try to lie about this now?!? Here is more proof that you just can't stop lying:

Let’s Give Up on the Constitution

Because one person wrote an article? How many conservatives want to treat U.S. citizens differently according to their religious beliefs? More than one, should I draw some conclusion from that?

 

[HappyJoy]

And no, the General Welfare Clause doesn't come into play because this doesn't benefit U.S. citizens.

The internet doesn't benefit all citizens?!? Really? What bizarre progressive world do you live in?

Clearly you misread my post. Never did I say the internet didn't benefit our citizens. Our role in overseeing ICANN has little to no benefit.

Learn to read.

 

[HappyJoy]

Reminder, title of this thread 'Last Month Of Open Uncensored Internet? Obama Set To Hand Over Internet To NWO Globalists...'

What a joke.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

There is no reason for the U.S. government to continue in the role it's had. There just isn't, I'd rather they focus on governing the country.

"There is no reason" is not a reason to surrender such a valuable strategic asset. Would you like to try again sweetie? You're dying a slow death here...

How is oversight of top-level domain creation a "valuable strategic asset"?

Do you understand what ICANN does?

 

[Norman]

Libs hate freedom of speech. The internet has basically destroyed their party and lies.

 

[P@triot]

I never made a point one way or another about the agencies and organizations you have listed.

Trying to avoid the issue? You said you don't want your government involved in things that they don't need to be involved in. Well, they certainly don't need to be involved in art (National Endowment for the Arts). And they sure as hell don't need to be involved in horses (National Wild Horse and Burro Program). Or any of the other departments on the list.

The limited role our government has in regards to ICANN is pointless.

You mean IANA? The government has nearly no role in ICANN. That's the point. We're surrendering a major advantage to the international community. You're clearly confused as you chase your tail to justify something that simply cannot be justified.

 

[P@triot]

There is no reason for the U.S. government to continue in the role it's had. There just isn't, I'd rather they focus on governing the country.

"There is no reason" is not a reason to surrender such a valuable strategic asset. Would you like to try again sweetie? You're dying a slow death here...

How is oversight of top-level domain creation a "valuable strategic asset"?

Do you understand what ICANN does?

Yes...it registers/assigns IP addresses and DNS names. How is that not a strategic asset? Those are access to the internet. If your computer can't get an IP address - guess what? You don't get on the internet.

 

[P@triot]

Libs hate freedom of speech. The internet has basically destroyed their party and lies.

Bingo! Why do you think Obama spent the first two years of his Administration screaming for an "internet kill switch"? Seriously - who does that? Only oppressive dictators looking to control the flow of information.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

There is no reason for the U.S. government to continue in the role it's had. There just isn't, I'd rather they focus on governing the country.

"There is no reason" is not a reason to surrender such a valuable strategic asset. Would you like to try again sweetie? You're dying a slow death here...

How is oversight of top-level domain creation a "valuable strategic asset"?

Do you understand what ICANN does?

Yes...it registers/assigns IP addresses and DNS names. How is that not a strategic asset? Those are access to the internet. If your computer can't get an IP address - guess what? You don't get on the internet.

I don't think you understand how this works.

Are you under the impression that each time you log on to the internet, ICANN gives you an IP address?

 

[P@triot]

There is no reason for the U.S. government to continue in the role it's had. There just isn't, I'd rather they focus on governing the country.

"There is no reason" is not a reason to surrender such a valuable strategic asset. Would you like to try again sweetie? You're dying a slow death here...

How is oversight of top-level domain creation a "valuable strategic asset"?

Do you understand what ICANN does?

Yes...it registers/assigns IP addresses and DNS names. How is that not a strategic asset? Those are access to the internet. If your computer can't get an IP address - guess what? You don't get on the internet.

I don't think you understand how this works.

Are you under the impression that each time you log on to the internet, ICANN gives you an IP address?

I've forgotten more about technology than you will ever know - I promise you that. I've highlighted the section above where I already explained this to you. Please ask an adult for help.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

There is no reason for the U.S. government to continue in the role it's had. There just isn't, I'd rather they focus on governing the country.

"There is no reason" is not a reason to surrender such a valuable strategic asset. Would you like to try again sweetie? You're dying a slow death here...

How is oversight of top-level domain creation a "valuable strategic asset"?

Do you understand what ICANN does?

Yes...it registers/assigns IP addresses and DNS names. How is that not a strategic asset? Those are access to the internet. If your computer can't get an IP address - guess what? You don't get on the internet.

I don't think you understand how this works.

Are you under the impression that each time you log on to the internet, ICANN gives you an IP address?

I've forgotten more about technology than you will ever know - I promise you that. I've highlighted the section above where I already explained this to you. Please ask an adult for help.

Of course you have, clown shoes. Thats why you've spent this whole thread demonstrating your abject ignorance on all things internet.

Blustering like a fool isn't impressing anyone, shitbird.

ICANN doesn't have the power to deny IP addresses.

 

[HappyJoy]

There is no reason for the U.S. government to continue in the role it's had. There just isn't, I'd rather they focus on governing the country.

"There is no reason" is not a reason to surrender such a valuable strategic asset. Would you like to try again sweetie? You're dying a slow death here...

How is oversight of top-level domain creation a "valuable strategic asset"?

Do you understand what ICANN does?

Yes...it registers/assigns IP addresses and DNS names. How is that not a strategic asset? Those are access to the internet. If your computer can't get an IP address - guess what? You don't get on the internet.

I don't think you understand how this works.

Are you under the impression that each time you log on to the internet, ICANN gives you an IP address?

I've forgotten more about technology than you will ever know - I promise you that. I've highlighted the section above where I already explained this to you. Please ask an adult for help.

Dipshit. ICANN has nothing to do with your computer accessing the internet. It assigns names like 'usmessageboard.com' to ip addresses. It doesn't assign your computer an ip address.

There is no one single entity that has the ability to decide whether every man, woman or child on the globe can have access to the internet.

 

[P@triot]

Dipshit. ICANN has nothing to do with your computer accessing the internet. It assigns names like 'usmessageboard.com' to ip addresses. It doesn't assign your computer an ip address.

It assigns IP address and DNS names you dumb old hag. You have no idea what DNS is (it's domain naming system) - which is the "usmessageboard.com" example you gave. Why are you trying to argue about technology when you don't have a freaking clue about it. Hell - you thought ICANN was IANA in several posts above.

If ICANN decides not to issue a block of IP addresses to the U.S. because of the influence that China, Iran, and Russia has over them - then what, stupid? A logical, rational person does not relinquish control of something as powerful as the internet (especially when one was the creator of that asset). You can't justify it at all but you're such a blind, obedient, partisan hack, you can't bring yourself to admit how insanely idiotic this is by Obama.

 

[g5000]

Donald Trump wants to 'close up' the Internet

 

[HappyJoy]

Dipshit. ICANN has nothing to do with your computer accessing the internet. It assigns names like 'usmessageboard.com' to ip addresses. It doesn't assign your computer an ip address.

It assigns IP address and DNS names you dumb old hag. You have no idea what DNS is (it's domain naming system) - which is the "usmessageboard.com" example you gave. Why are you trying to argue about technology when you don't have a freaking clue about it. Hell - you thought ICANN was IANA in several posts above.

Reread my post please, it's not saying what you think it is. And yes, ICANN is the non profit that assigns top level domains that is currently overseen by the U.S. government.

If ICANN decides not to issue a block of IP addresses to the U.S. because of the influence that China, Iran, and Russia has over them - then what, stupid? A logical, rational person does not relinquish control of something as powerful as the internet (especially when one was the creator of that asset). You can't justify it at all but you're such a blind, obedient, partisan hack, you can't bring yourself to admit how insanely idiotic this is by Obama.

Then nothing. It won't happen. It's not really that powerful, it's something more akin to book keeping.

 

[P@triot]

Then nothing. It won't happen. It's not really that powerful, it's something more akin to book keeping.

Yeah....and why are the do the "book keeping"? Because duplicate IP's cannot exist. And they assign the IP's. And if they decide to stop granting the U.S. IP's to have leverage over them - then what?

You and both know that you're wrong but you just can't bring yourself to admit it. Obama must be praised at all costs - uh? Typical progressive. You'd fit in well in oppressive nations. Worship "dear leader" and don't dare criticize!

 

[HappyJoy]

Then nothing. It won't happen. It's not really that powerful, it's something more akin to book keeping.

Yeah....and why are the do the "book keeping"? Because duplicate IP's cannot exist. And they assign the IP's. And if they decide to stop granting the U.S. IP's to have leverage over them - then what?

You and both know that you're wrong but you just can't bring yourself to admit it. Obama must be praised at all costs - uh? Typical progressive. You'd fit in well in oppressive nations. Worship "dear leader" and don't dare criticize!

You're right, sharia law is going to take over the internet. Just like sharia law took over google, bing and every porn site you've ever visited. Grow up, nothing is going to change.

In reality, and in keeping with a free an open internet the U.S. government is simply keeping a promise.

 

[P@triot]

Then nothing. It won't happen. It's not really that powerful, it's something more akin to book keeping.

Yeah....and why are the do the "book keeping"? Because duplicate IP's cannot exist. And they assign the IP's. And if they decide to stop granting the U.S. IP's to have leverage over them - then what?

You and both know that you're wrong but you just can't bring yourself to admit it. Obama must be praised at all costs - uh? Typical progressive. You'd fit in well in oppressive nations. Worship "dear leader" and don't dare criticize!

You're right, sharia law is going to take over the internet. Just like sharia law took over google, bing and every porn site you've ever visited. Grow up, nothing is going to change.

In reality, and in keeping with a free an open internet the U.S. government is simply keeping a promise.

Yeah...nothing says "free and open" like China, Russia, and Iran. Keep bowing to "Dear Leader". It really brings you a lot of credibility.

 

[P@triot]

Wow HappyJoy - I guess your insistence on being fact-averse doesn't stop reality like you hoped it would.

Just five years after ICANN was created, the United Nations established a Working Group on Internet Governance “to investigate and make proposals for action … on the governance of Internet.”

Governance? Governance? I thought you said the internet would remain "free and open"? But wait! There's more! (this is like one of those fun infomercials)

And in 2012 at the World Conference on International Telecommunications, several authoritarian regimes—including Russia, China, and Saudi Arabia—called for the “sovereign right” of governments to “establish and implement public policy, including international policy, on matters of Internet governance.”

The "right of governments" to "establish public policy on matters of internet governance"? Damn Joy - I see a pattern here. If you weren't a mindless, obedient progressive, you would too. But wait! There's more! If you act now - you'll also learn this:

The United States firmly resisted these calls for more international control over the internet until 2013 when Edward Snowden leaked details of the National Security Agency’s surveillance program

Well that's odd Joy. Why would the U.S. government under Barack Obama firmly resist what it is now trying to do?!? Now, I realize this takes some honest independent thought (something that mindless, obedient progressives don't engage in) but perhaps you could try something new for a change?

Here is the bottom line: Barack Obama spent the first two years or so in office just screaming for an "internet KILL SWITCH". It was damn near all he talked about outside of Obamacare. Once it became clear that he wasn't going to get that awesome power that he so desperately desired, he went to the next best thing - surrendering it to an international community that overwhelmingly shares his views that those in power should control and censor information to the minions.

We Shouldn't Give Away the Internet to Authoritarian Regimes

 

[longknife]

As the current U.S. President and his fellow NWO Globalist Elites continue their assault on Freedom & Liberty, will the U.S. Congress stand with the People and thwart them?


Congress Can Save the Internet

President Obama wants this to be the last month of an open, uncensored internet guaranteed by the U.S. government. His plan to end American stewardship would hand new power to authoritarian governments offended by the internet as we know it.

The good news is it appears congressional leaders have agreed to rescue the internet in time to prevent the Sept. 30 expiration of U.S. oversight. Sen. Ted Cruz, who has pushed hard against the plan since it was announced two years ago, told me last week he’s “cautiously optimistic” legislators will block it through a rider to the federal budget: “The basic proposition of keeping the internet free has united Republicans across the spectrum and should also unite Democrats with Republicans.”

Top Senate and House Republicans have signaled they will ensure U.S. oversight continues to protect the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or Icann, and its stakeholders...

Read More:
Congress Can Save the Internet
DRUDGE REPORT 2016®

I've been warning about this for almost 7 years and nobody heeded me.