Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Yes he did.

However immediately after Rosenbaum fell someone else ( unidentified maybe zimmerman maybe not ) fired three more shots. Where and at what is unknown. We just know it was not Zittenhouse.

Yes. There was one small-caliber shot (into the air by Ziminski) followed immediately by 4 shots from Rittenhouse, followed by 3 more small-caliber shots.

Where any of those landed is unclear.

At no time did Rittenhouse shoot Rosenbaum after the immediate burst of 4 rounds. If one of those 4 quick bursts hit Rosenbaum in the back, it was not because Rosenbaum was no longer a threat. Rather, the timing of the shot and Rosenbaum's lunge.

 

[Flash]

Why did Kyle Rittenhouse drive from another town armed and calling himself helping police?

This guy was not in any danger and he will probably get off. Then we will read the crazy coming from these racists. So understand that if this happens don't ***** about the whites getting beaten or killed by blacks beause we will be in fear for our lives.

Just like Rittrenhouse was.

You are confused Moon Bat.

This case has nothing to do with where Kyle came from or what even he was doing there.

It is a simple self defense case. Kyle got attacked by a several shitheads and he took care of business by dispatching two of the assholes and wounding the other.

The real question is why were the filthy Communists/Negros shitheads there destroying Kenosha?

 

[JohnDB]

 

[Dirk the Daring]

So?

I haven't watched the video in question, will try this evening maybe. But can you provide a time stamp of when the shot in the back happened? I'll try to look for it specifically.

 

[Faun]

No I have proven you wrong. Others were shooting
But you know you are lying when you claim rittenhouse Shot Rosenbaum in the back

Others (plural) were not shooting. You're delirious again. One person fired one shot in the air in the direction of the sky. Asserting that was the bullet striking Rosenbaum in the back is beyond ludicrous. Not even Rittenhouse's defense has uttered such nonsense.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I have no idea why he fired but he should be charged for discharging his firearm.

I can think of a reason.

He wanted to get Rittenhouse to react. It's like they planned to get a reaction out of Rittenhouse and did everything in their power to provoke it.

 

[westwall]

Really?

Here's the law. Quote the part which states a misdemeanor conviction disqualify someone from legally being allowed to conceal carry...

2012 Wisconsin Statutes & Annotations :: 175. Miscellaneous police provisions. :: 175.60 License to carry a concealed weapon.

law.justia.com

There 10 different misdemeanors that make you a prohibited person. It's a FEDERAL law, dumbshit.

 

[westwall]

Others (plural) were not shooting. You're delirious again. One person fired one shot in the air in the direction of the sky. Asserting that was the bullet striking Rosenbaum in the back is beyond ludicrous. Not even Rittenhouse's defense has uttered such nonsense.

It is already in evidence rhat Kyle responded to a shot BEHIND HIM you ignorant ****.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Others (plural) were not shooting. You're delirious again. One person fired one shot in the air in the direction of the sky. Asserting that was the bullet striking Rosenbaum in the back is beyond ludicrous. Not even Rittenhouse's defense has uttered such nonsense.

Yes they were.

The video proves three shots o0f unknown origin ( but not rittenhouse ) AFTER he shot rosenbaum

Just as the video proves you are a liar and Rittenhouse was facing rosenbaum when he shot him

You are actually very uninformed on this entire issue

 

[2aguy]

He had no business being there acting as police. He and the others doing so should have been arrested or sent home.

He wasn't acting as police...in each of the shootings, he was running away from the attackers.....

 

[westwall]

He had no business being there acting as police. He and the others doing so should have been arrested or sent home.

He had every right to be there you ****. The assholes trying to burn the place down, DIDN'T

 

[Faun]

There 10 different misdemeanors that make you a prohibited person. It's a FEDERAL law, dumbshit.

Don't just mindlessly claim that. Quote the law as I did.

 

[maybelooking]

I'm going to take a bunch of idiots off ignore after this trial is over......for about 4 or 5 hours, just to see all these hysterical women whine and moan about Kyle being found not guilty!!

 

[Rigby5]

doesnt prove kyle shot him in the back,, just that after being shot 3 times in the front his body rotated and the last one hit him in th back,,

That does not help.
If you are shooting someone who is going down and rotating, you are guilty of murder.
In fact, since Rosenbaum was unarmed, then there is never a legal defense for shooting at all, even if he is bigger.

 

[Faun]

It is already in evidence rhat Kyle responded to a shot BEHIND HIM you ignorant ****.

Dumbfuck, learn English. I didn't deny a shot was fired prior to Rittenhouse firing his weapon.

 

[westwall]

Don't just mindlessly claim that. Quote the law as I did.

I am on my phone so can't do it. Look up federal prohibited person

 

[jc456]

That does not help.
If you are shooting someone who is going down and rotating, you are guilty of murder.
In fact, since Rosenbaum was unarmed, then there is never a legal defense for shooting at all, even if he is bigger.

why did rosenbaum ambush Kyle and chase after him in pursuit?

 

[progressive hunter]

That does not help.
If you are shooting someone who is going down and rotating, you are guilty of murder.
In fact, since Rosenbaum was unarmed, then there is never a legal defense for shooting at all, even if he is bigger.

no it doesnt,, more so when it happens this quick,,

 

[2aguy]

That does not help.
If you are shooting someone who is going down and rotating, you are guilty of murder.
In fact, since Rosenbaum was unarmed, then there is never a legal defense for shooting at all, even if he is bigger.

Wrong....there is a legal defense even if the attacker is unarmed...as the actual witness already stated, the Daily Caller journalist who actually saw Rosenbaum get shot, he stated he lunged and tried to grab Rittenhouse's rifle......trying to take possession of the rifle, after stating he was going to kill him, allows for self defense...

 

[Faun]

Yes they were.

The video proves three shots o0f unknown origin ( but not rittenhouse ) AFTER he shot rosenbaum

Ok, my mistake. I thought you were talking about shots before Rittenhouse fired.