Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

[Faun]

Wrong liar.

Every witness statement as well as VIDEO proves rittenhouse did not shoot him in the back You are owned and proven a childish lying bitch now run along BOY

Quote a witness saying Rosenbaum was not shot in the back.

You're fucking insane.

 

[Faun]

then why havent you posted it??

I have.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

LOLOL

Not every rightard here even agrees he was shot in the back. Even though there's video showing a bullet hole in his back. Even though the autopsy states he was shot in the back

Rightardism aside, yes, they were quick shots. That will be the defenses argument. Frankly, that's all they can argue for shooting Rosenbaum in the back. I don't buy that excuses him. He was in control of that weapon. He chose to shoot 4 times, once in the back. How many shots did he need to take, in your opinion, to be excessive? Would have emptying his magazine been excessive?

I have been trained to shoot until the threat stops.

4 shots is HARDLY excessive.

If he would have emptied a 30-round magazine into Rosenbaum, you may have an argument.

NOBODY is going to argue that Rittenhouse's use of that firearm was excessive.

In fact, the guy on the stand just now has basically admitted that Rittenhouse only fired when threatened and did not shoot otherwise, so cling to that bullshit "shot him in the back" fact if you wish. It will get NOWHERE.

 

[Faun]

Rittenhouse did not shoot Rosenbaum in the back you dumb fucking fool

LOL

Now I see why you chose your screen name-- you have soup for brains.

Again, for the hard of learning...

Dr. Kelley of the Milwaukee Medical Examiner’s Office conducted an autopsy on Joseph Rosenbaum. Dr. Kelley indicated that Rosenbaum had a gunshot wound to the right groin which fractured his pelvis, a gunshot wound to the back which perforated his right lung and liver, a gunshot wound to the left hand, a superficial gunshot wound to his lateral left thigh, and a graze gunshot wound to the right side of his forehead.​

 

[Soupnazi630]

LOLOL

Not every rightard here even agrees he was shot in the back. Even though there's video showing a bullet hole in his back. Even though the autopsy states he was shot in the back

Rightardism aside, yes, they were quick shots. That will be the defenses argument. Frankly, that's all they can argue for shooting Rosenbaum in the back. I don't buy that excuses him. He was in control of that weapon. He chose to shoot 4 times, once in the back. How many shots did he need to take, in your opinion, to be excessive? Would have emptying his magazine been excessive?

The video of the SHOOTING PROVES He did not shoot Rodenbaum in the back

 

[Faun]

rit

Rittenhouse did not shoot him in the back liar.

That is proven fact

Again, loon...

Dr. Kelley of the Milwaukee Medical Examiner’s Office conducted an autopsy on Joseph Rosenbaum. Dr. Kelley indicated that Rosenbaum had a gunshot wound to the right groin which fractured his pelvis, a gunshot wound to the back which perforated his right lung and liver, a gunshot wound to the left hand, a superficial gunshot wound to his lateral left thigh, and a graze gunshot wound to the right side of his forehead.​

 

[Soupnazi630]

Again, loon...

Dr. Kelley of the Milwaukee Medical Examiner’s Office conducted an autopsy on Joseph Rosenbaum. Dr. Kelley indicated that Rosenbaum had a gunshot wound to the right groin which fractured his pelvis, a gunshot wound to the back which perforated his right lung and liver, a gunshot wound to the left hand, a superficial gunshot wound to his lateral left thigh, and a graze gunshot wound to the right side of his forehead.​

The video proves beyond question that Rittenhouse did not shoot Rosenbaum in the back

You can only lie aboiut that like a coward

 

[Faun]

After being shot while attacking Rittenhouse you fucking coward

With the last shot hitting Rosenbaum in the back.

 

[Faun]

Defense is trying to enter into evidence the POS statement that he wishes he had blown Kyles head off.

This gon be good!!!!

They should enter that. He said it.

 

[Faun]

Rittenhouse did not shoot Rosenbaum in the back so your repitition is a proven repeated lie.

Cries a raving lunatic.

I'm hurt you feel that way.

 

[Faun]

"Can you post a link to that video?

Already have many times. Someone else posted it here a page or two ago.

 

[progressive hunter]

With the last shot hitting Rosenbaum in the back.

doesnt prove kyle shot him in the back,, just that after being shot 3 times in the front his body rotated and the last one hit him in th back,,

 

[Soupnazi630]

With the last shot hitting Rosenbaum in the back.

Wrong every shot facing him

 

[Soupnazi630]

Cries a raving lunatic.

I'm hurt you feel that way.

Nope so syas a person smarter than you with absolute evidence proving you wrong

 

[Faun]

The video of the SHOOTING PROVES He did not shoot Rodenbaum in the back

Suuure, loon. Uh-huh.

Someone else must've shot him in the back on the way to the medical examiner.

 

[Faun]

doesnt prove kyle shot him in the back,, just that after being shot 3 times in the front his body rotated and the last one hit him in th back,,

Nutcase, the video doesn't show Rosenbaum rotating. It shows him lunging forward and falling face down on the ground. Which is how McGinnis found him before flipping him over on his back.

 

[Rigby5]

I have been trained to shoot until the threat stops.

4 shots is HARDLY excessive.

If he would have emptied a 30-round magazine into Rosenbaum, you may have an argument.

NOBODY is going to argue that Rittenhouse's use of that firearm was excessive.

In fact, the guy on the stand just now has basically admitted that Rittenhouse only fired when threatened and did not shoot otherwise, so cling to that bullshit "shot him in the back" fact if you wish. It will get NOWHERE.

I disagree.
Everyone trained is being illegally told to shoot until the threat stops.
Threat elimination is not legal.
If it were legal, then every cop would be shot and killed instantly because the whole point of police is that they are a lethal threat.
It is only legal to shoot the minimum in order to reduce the risk to a reasonable level, and in reality a warning shot is almost always all that is needed.
The way police are trained these days are under military rules of engagement, which are totally illegal for police.

Firing ANY shot into Rosenbaum was extremely excessive.
Rittenhouse was required to first fire a warning shot.
Only if Rosenbaum was armed and about to fire, could Rittenhouse have legally aimed at Rosenbaum, and even then, at such close range, a single shot, aimed at extremities, is all that would have been legal.
The multiple burst the police are currently trained to do, is completely and entirely illegal, and any cop from 30 years ago will verify that.

You can not fire simply by being threatened.
There has to be an imminent deadly threat from a lethal weapon.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Suuure, loon. Uh-huh.

Someone else must've shot him in the back on the way to the medical examiner.

Or the erson who was behind him and began firing a weapon BEFORE Rittenhouse fired which is also clearly shown on video,

Either way the video proves beyond question that Rittenhouse shot him while facing him.

 

[progressive hunter]

Nutcase, the video doesn't show Rosenbaum rotating. It shows him lunging forward and falling face down on the ground. Which is how McGinnis found him before flipping him over on his back.

so kyle didnt shoot him in the back as you claim,,

 

[Faun]

Wrong every shot facing him

LOLOLOL

You're a fucking nut. Provable by every post you make. How does one shoot someone in the back if they're face to face?