Kyle Rittenhouse trial...already disproving SO MANY LIES from the left

[Soupnazi630]

Aww, poor baby. Sure beats having to defend Rittenhouse shooting Rosenbaum in the back.

Rittenhouse did not shoot Rosenbaum in the back you dumb ******* fool

 

[Faun]

He was a prohibited person, dumbshit.

For what reason?

 

[Faun]

so theress no video of him standing over him shooting him in the back,,

got it,,

LOLOL

Of course there is. How else did Rittenhouse shoot him in the back?

 

[Faun]

It doesn't look like Rittenhouse shot him in the back.

Maybe to a ******* moron like you, but he had a bullet hole in his back and the medical examiner performing the autopsy noted he was shot in the back.

 

[Faun]

How could Rittenhouse shoot him in the back if Rosenbaum is still running towards Rittenhouse?

He wasn't. He fell to the ground at Rittenhouse's feet, ya ******* moron.

 

[Rust_Cohle]

Defense - "is that your arm getting vaporized"

Gaige - " yes"

LOL and this fool is trying to sue for 10 million dollars

 

[Soupnazi630]

rit

LOLOL

Of course there is. How else did Rittenhouse shoot him in the back?

Rittenhouse did not shoot him in the back liar.

That is proven fact

 

[Soupnazi630]

He wasn't. He fell to the ground at Rittenhouse's feet, ya ******* moron.

After being shot while attacking Rittenhouse you ******* coward

 

[bripat9643]

He wasn't. He fell to the ground at Rittenhouse's feet, ya ******* moron.

Watch the ******* video.

 

[maybelooking]

Defense is trying to enter into evidence the POS statement that he wishes he had blown Kyles head off.

This gon be good!!!!

 

[Faun]

Okay, so tell us what about this situation removes Rittenhouse's self-defense claim?

Here's the law, in case you need to refer to it:

Wisconsin Statutes 939.48 - Self-Defense

I've already stated it many times. I believe shooting Rosenbaum in the back was excessive force. The law only allows for enough force necessary to stop a threat. It is not necessary to shoot someone in the back to stop a threat.

 

[Faun]

Watch the ******* video.

******* moron, what I'm saying is on the video.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I've already stated it many times. I believe shooting Rosenbaum in the back was excessive force. The law only allows for enough force necessary to stop a threat. It is not necessary to shoot someone in the back to stop a threat.

Rittenhouse did not shoot Rosenbaum in the back so your repitition is a proven repeated lie.

 

[Soupnazi630]

******* moron, what I'm saying is on the video.

No it is not you lying coward

 

[bripat9643]

******* moron, what I'm saying is on the video.

I sure as hell didn't see it.

 

[Soupnazi630]

I sure as hell didn't see it.

no one did.

This fool is just desperately trying to save face after being caight in an outright ie and he lacks the maturity to admit it

 

[Faun]

We agree that one of the bullets hit Rosenbaum in the back. 4 rounds fired in quick precession typically have all sorts of different trajectories.

That's not the same thing as Rittenhouse walking up behind Rosenbaum and shooting him right in the back.

You are DEFINITELY trying to spin it in that direction.

LOLOL

Not every rightard here even agrees he was shot in the back. Even though there's video showing a bullet hole in his back. Even though the autopsy states he was shot in the back

Rightardism aside, yes, they were quick shots. That will be the defenses argument. Frankly, that's all they can argue for shooting Rosenbaum in the back. I don't buy that excuses him. He was in control of that weapon. He chose to shoot 4 times, once in the back. How many shots did he need to take, in your opinion, to be excessive? Would have emptying his magazine been excessive?

 

[Faun]

I sure as hell didn't see it.

So?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

After being shot while attacking Rittenhouse you ******* coward

Faun is playing pettifogger and running hard and loose with the facts.

A bullet may have entered Rosenbaum from his back, but it's hardly because Rittenhouse walked up to Rosenbaum and shot him from behind.

Quit feeding the troll.

 

[progressive hunter]

LOLOL

Of course there is. How else did Rittenhouse shoot him in the back?

then why havent you posted it??