Kyle Rittenhouse: Teen's homicide trial for Kenosha shootings opens with jury selection

[Soupnazi630]

Statistics show that had you been armed, you would have been more likely to be dead with a bullet in your own head. Deal with that fact if you want a discussion with me to survive here.

That is an outright fallacy no statistics support your claims

 

[the other mike]

Statistics show that had he been allowed to be armed---crime would be lower in his neighborhood.

Why I carry my slingshot and a bag of pebbles everywhere.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

I hope this Great American Patriot gets off scott free.
We havent seen a Patriot on this level since JWB. Thats saying something!
#FreeRittenhouse

You're an idiot.

 

[TNHarley]

You're an idiot.

To anti-american scum, it may seem that way
#FreeRittenhouse

 

[Faun]

Really? Moron... I made it big so even a moron like you can read it.

opening arguments​

in British English​

(ˈəʊpənɪŋ ˈɑːɡjʊmənts)
PLURAL NOUN
law, US
the statements or arguments provided by lawyers at the beginning of a trial
the Supreme Court heard opening arguments in Eldred v. Ashcroft
Collins English Dictionary. Copyright © HarperCollins Publishers

Opening arguments definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary

Opening arguments definition: the statements or arguments provided by lawyers at the beginning of a trial | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and examples

www.collinsdictionary.com

"in British English"

We're in America, ya dumbfucking moron. Exactly how desperate are you?? And I quoted the judge in this case in America who said, "there's no such thing as an opening argument. It's opening statement. The argument is for the end and that's when they're going to make their pleas to you to return verdicts in accordance with their beliefs."

 

[westwall]

"in British English"

We're in America, ya dumbfucking moron. Exactly how desperate are you?? And I quoted the judge in this case in America who said, "there's no such thing as an opening argument. It's opening statement. The argument is for the end and that's when they're going to make their pleas to you to return verdicts in accordance with their beliefs."

Yeah, guess what, I used to testify in the English Court system all the time as an expert witness.

Unlike you I am a professional.

You are just a troll.

 

[maybelooking]

To anti-american scum, it may seem that way
#FreeRittenhouse

Day 3 of the trial, and if you have been watching its easy to see the prosecution has no case.

 

[maybelooking]

My prior post was incorrect so I deleted it. I stepped out of the room and court TV changed trials on me!!!!

whoops.

 

[Faun]

That doesn't show anyone shot in the back. It shows someone laying on their back that had been shot in the head.

LOL

You're such an idiot. He was shot in the back, groin, thigh and hand. He was not shot in the head. And he was laying on the ground face down until Richie McGinnis flipped him over onto his back.

Seriously, the forum needed no further evidence of your blatant ignorance.

 

[Faun]

These are the photos of Rittenhouse shooting the two that were deceased. Which one was shot in the back?

View attachment 559977View attachment 559978

LOLOL

Moron, the first picture is of a guy who wasn't shot, though Rittenhouse fired at him twice. The second was shot in the chest.

 

[miketx]

So, finally the trial starts..now we shall see...The Defense will be going for self-defense.or some sort of jury nullification...the Prosecutor will try to make him look like Tim McVeigh.
My take has always been that it's slam dunk legally for Man 1--easy to prove callous or reckless disregard resulting in a death..murder..nope..too hard to prove intent.

But at least its started~

Kyle Rittenhouse: Jury selected for teen's homicide trial

Prosecutors say Rittenhouse's actions constituted criminal homicide, but his attorneys say he shot the men in self-defense. Wisconsin law requires when a self-defense claim is raised, prosecutors must disprove self-defense beyond a reasonable doubt -- a difficult obstacle for the state.
"It's a pretty substantial burden for the prosecution to do that and I think that's going to be where the real challenge for them lies," said John Gross, a clinical associate professor and the director of the Public Defender Project at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Law School.
Those chosen to sit on the jury will be tasked with assessing the reasonableness of Rittenhouse's actions that night.
"We want the jury to be a check on the power of the state and to enforce community norms," said Cecelia Klingele, an associate professor of law at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "So when the law requires that force is used reasonably, we want our community to decide what is or isn't reasonable."

You must be one twisted freak to love criminals like you do.

 

[miketx]

LOL

You're such an idiot. He was shot in the back, groin, thigh and hand. He was not shot in the head. And he was laying on the ground face down until Richie McGinnis flipped him over onto his back.

Seriously, the forum needed no further evidence of your blatant ignorance.

He deserved every bullet he got. Wish you were there.

 

[Faun]

Wisconsin law for jaywalking verses city ordinance?

Post something legal other than you just making hollow claims.

 

[Faun]

The prosecution claims? LOL!!!!

The word of a lawyer has NO VALUE.

Rosenbaum was part of a mob, and the mob attacked Rittenhouse. The Rosenbaum was the lead element of the mob, is irrelevant.

You're still lying. Rosenbaum initially chased Rittenhouse. The mob didn't.

If truth and reality were on your side, you wouldn't have to keep lying like that.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

You're still lying. Rosenbaum initially chased Rittenhouse. The mob didn't.

If truth and reality were on your side, you wouldn't have to keep lying like that.

Good god. Shut the **** up until you have watched the FBI video. Jesus.

 

[Faun]

Yeah, guess what, I used to testify in the English Court system all the time as an expert witness.

Unlike you I am a professional.

You are just a troll.

LOLOL

Dumbfuck, I don't care what you did or where you did it. You fucked up posting a British definition in a failed attempt to apply a British term to American law.

If that term applied to American law, you would have been able to post an American definition instead of one from Britain.

 

[Faun]

He deserved every bullet he got. Wish you were there.

Too bad for you, I'm not. And the jury will decide who deserves what.

 

[Faun]

Good god. Shut the **** up until you have watched the FBI video. Jesus.

I watched it. No one but Rosenbaum went after Rittenhouse in that first confrontation.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Too bad for you, I'm not. And the jury will decide who deserves what.

Look at this beautiful sight.

A mere kid doing righteous work.

The Result?

Dead ******* commies.

Look at that STONE DEAD piece of commie shit. That is GLORIOUS!!!

I wish I could have been there to t-bag his worthless carcass.

 

[Faun]

Look at this beautiful sight.

A mere kid doing righteous work.

The Result?

View attachment 560252

Dead ******* commies.

Look at that STONE DEAD piece of commie shit. That is GLORIOUS!!!

I wish I could have been there to t-bag his worthless carcass.

And Rittenhouse facing life in prison.