Kyle Rittenhouse: Teen's homicide trial for Kenosha shootings opens with jury selection

[Donald H]

It has nothing to do with Race. TRhe people he shot were white.

The only threat of fascism we face comes from the left.

There are indications rising up all over America now.

America's dramatic rise in 'hate crimes' has a surprisingly logical explanation Nice uniforms!

That doesn't look like the left to me, but it could be another false flag event the same as Jan. 6tth?

 

[Faun]

I can see a muzzle flash from a pistol held by the person in black in the first few frames at 0:01. That was the first shot fired.

At the same time, I can see Rittenhouse and Rosenbaum to the far right.

Rosenbaum runs up behind Rittenhouse and tries to take his rifle at 0:03.

Then, 4 shots from a .223

Then, 3 shots from some other direction behind the cars, from a pistol.

Choadbreath, again, we're talking about Rittenhouse, not others.

No one else shot Rosenbaum.

 

[Donald H]

Kyle is just a tool in the crime. The major issue is in lowering the bar on murder of blacks being justified in America. The same as Chauvin attempted to do for police officers.

Once on that slippery slope, fascism grows exponentially as the courts are freed up to dismiss murder on grounds of self defense or any excuse that can free up extreme rightists.

In Canada it's not permitted to shoot a burglar as a general rule. We prize that rule for several reasons, among which we don't have homeowners gunning down their own family members.

 

[Donald H]

Then.....shut the **** up???

Canadians have a stake in America's outcome. I won't get into more detail. Discussion with you is terminated due to your rudeness and excessive profanity.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Kyle is just a tool in the crime. The major issue is in lowering the bar on murder of blacks being justified in America.

Blacks commit most of the murders in the US and most of the blacks murdered in the US murdered by other blacks.

 

[M14 Shooter]

In Canada it's not permitted to shoot a burglar as a general rule.

Because you value the lives of criminals over the lives of citizens.

 

[Donald H]

Because you value the lives of criminals over the lives of citizens.

I can excuse that angry accusation for now in order to reply with an explanation.

We Canadians value the lives of all people because lethal action with your gun is punishment that doesn't fit the crime in most cases.
We don't, and never have shot people dead for drinking out of white only water fountains.
We don't for non-white people walking on the sidewalks.
We don't shoot people for trespassing on other's property.
We don't shoot people any number of minor crimes that Americans see as justification to murder.

We value human lives and those that don't are punished duly by our laws.
We accept a woman's right to abortion but we work together across political lines to 'discourage' behaviour that results in a woman's need for abortion.

If we're going to have an adult conversation, I expect appropriate politeness. I make no exceptions from here on in.

 

[maybelooking]

The state is absolutely sucking right now. The judge Is on their ass too!!!!

 

[Donald H]

Blacks commit most of the murders in the US and most of the blacks murdered in the US murdered by other blacks.

Yes. America has a 'race' problem that has been created by unequal treatment of non-whites. That has become a extreme racism issue with white Americans and is thusly returned in kind by non-whites too.

The south never did completely accept that it could no longer keep slaves and that made America different from other countries that were able to move on.

And now the only solution Americans know how to turn to is violence and brutal police force against the black population.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I can excuse that angry accusation for now in order to reply with an explanation.

One sure to be full of factual and logical errors.

We Canadians value the lives of all people because lethal action with your gun is punishment that doesn't fit the crime in most cases.

The act of self-defense is not punshishment for a crime.

We don't, and never have shot people dead for drinking out of white only water fountains.

Irrelevant to the issue at hand.

We don't for non-white people walking on the sidewalks.

Irrelevant to the issue at hand.

We don't shoot people for trespassing on other's property.

Irrelevant to the issue at hand

We don't shoot people any number of minor crimes that Americans see as justification to murder.

Self-defense isn't murder

We value human lives and those that don't are punished duly by our laws.

And you value the lives of criminals over the law abiding.

As predicted:
Your explanation is full of factual and logical errors.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Yes. America has a 'race' problem that has been created by unequal treatment of non-whites.

You cannot demonstrate this to be true - and even if you can, it does not change the fact blacks commit most of the murders in the US and most of the blacks murdered in the US murdered by other blacks.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Canadians have a stake in America's outcome. I won't get into more detail. Discussion with you is terminated due to your rudeness and excessive profanity.

Yes, Canadians have a stake in America's outcome because Canada relies heavily on America for both defense and economy. Canada also relies heavily on America NOT deciding to take Canada by force.

Who do you think keeps America from becoming a totalitarian state that does things to wreck Canada?

Who keeps the politicians in control of America from extreme expansionism, including expanding North?

Who do you think keep check on the most powerful military the world has ever known?

What is the last line of protection against serious abuse of America's power?

That's right.

Gun owners.

I know you will probably deny it and act like it's not a FACT, but it is the truth. The sooner you realize it, the better off you, and Canada, will be. We keep the narcissist's from running amuck. We make them adhere to the U.S. Constitution. We keep them from invading every nation on earth. Because, while they do ignore us to a certain extent, they have to at least pretend to do our bidding, and the reason they must pretend????

They can't piss off people who have the ability to destroy them and/or operate independently, daring them to take military action with a force far too small to outgun 100 million or more gun owners.

You could just thank us, instead of blaming us.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Yes, Canadians have a stake in America's outcome because Canada relies heavily on America for both defense and economy. Canada also relies heavily on America NOT deciding to take Canada by force.

No kidding.
We send a n armadillo and three squirrels - after the exchange rate, we get one armored and three mechanized infantry divisions.

 

[Donald H]

Yes, Canadians have a stake in America's outcome because Canada relies heavily on America for both defense and economy. Canada also relies heavily on America NOT deciding to take Canada by force.

Canada has no enemies for which we would need to rely on any country's military.

Who do you think keeps America from becoming a totalitarian state that does things to wreck Canada?

America does cause some economic harm to Canada with unfair and dishonest trade relations. That has caused Canada to move a lot of trade away from the US and to China. There's more to come as America becomes less honest and less trustworthy.

Who keeps the politicians in control of America from extreme expansionism, including expanding North?

N.A. You're not being realistic.

Who do you think keep check on the most powerful military the world has ever known?

The world hasn't 'kept check' on America and that has resulted in about 40 US wars of aggression since WW2. But the nuclear deterrent known as MAD has kept the US from starting WW3.

What is the last line of protection against serious abuse of America's power?

That's right.

Gun owners.

That makes no sense.

I know you will probably deny it and act like it's not a FACT, but it is the truth. The sooner you realize it, the better off you, and Canada, will be. We keep the narcissist's from running amuck. We make them adhere to the U.S. Constitution. We keep them from invading every nation on earth. Because, while they do ignore us to a certain extent, they have to at least pretend to do our bidding, and the reason they must pretend????

It's my perception that America is coming closer to becoming a fascist threat to world peace, as it becomes more and more similar to other fascist threats in history. America has lost the economic war to China and has nowhere to turn but to military force.
China won't lose a fullscale war against America and will turn to nuclear arms instead of losing. China's world leading technology is already raising questions on whether or not America could mount a successful attack or indeed defend itself in a nuclear war.
And you want me to think of Americans pretending to be cowboys with guns, being a factor??

They can't piss off people who have the ability to destroy them and/or operate independently, daring them to take military action with a force far too small to outgun 100 million or more gun owners.

You could just thank us, instead of blaming us.

I'm thanking China for it's deterrent to US aggression in the rest of the 21st. century. On account of both Russia and China, America's PNAC agenda of world domination has been halted in its tracks!
What 50 million Americans do with their guns against the other 50 million, is a question you've raised that deserves further discussion. Keep it within the bounds of civility and maybe we can go there.

 

[westwall]

LOLOL

"There's no such thing as an opening argument. It's opening statement. The argument is for the end and that's when they're going to make their pleas to you to return verdicts in accordance with their beliefs."

Yet again, dumbfuck, you demonstrate abject ignorance of this case.

Really? Moron... I made it big so even a moron like you can read it.

opening arguments​

in British English​

(ˈəʊpənɪŋ ˈɑːɡjʊmənts)
PLURAL NOUN
law, US
the statements or arguments provided by lawyers at the beginning of a trial
the Supreme Court heard opening arguments in Eldred v. Ashcroft
Collins English Dictionary. Copyright © HarperCollins Publishers

Opening arguments definition and meaning | Collins English Dictionary

Opening arguments definition: the statements or arguments provided by lawyers at the beginning of a trial | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and examples

www.collinsdictionary.com

 

[M14 Shooter]

It's my perception that America is coming closer to becoming a fascist threat to world peace, as it becomes more and more similar to other fascist threats in history.

Well sure -- this is what happens when Democrats are in charge.

America has lost the economic war to China and has nowhere to turn but to military force.

Unsupportable nonsense.

China won't lose a fullscale war against America and will turn to nuclear arms instead of losing.

Why do you think China wudl prefer to lose a nuclear war over a conventional war?

China's world leading technology is already raising questions...

China -copies- technology.

on whether or not America could mount a successful attack or indeed defend itself in a nuclear war.

Unsupportable nonsense.

I'm thanking China for it's deterrent to US aggression in the rest of the 21st. century.

The Chinese cannot deter the US because the Chinese cannot project force outside East / Southeast asia.

 

[Donald H]

Well sure -- this is what happens when Democrats are in charge.

Unsupportable nonsense.

Why do you think China wudl prefer to lose a nuclear war over a conventional war?

China -copies- technology.

Unsupportable nonsense.

The Chinese cannot deter the US because the Chinese cannot project force outside East / Southeast asia.

I don't see that there's any rational thought put into your comments. For that reason I'm ending our discussion right now.

 

[M14 Shooter]

I don't see that there's any rational thought put into your comments.

Translation:
You know you have no reasoned response to anything I said.
I accept your surrender.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Canada has no enemies for which we would need to rely on any country's military.

America does cause some economic harm to Canada with unfair and dishonest trade relations. That has caused Canada to move a lot of trade away from the US and to China. There's more to come as America becomes less honest and less trustworthy.

N.A. You're not being realistic.

The world hasn't 'kept check' on America and that has resulted in about 40 US wars of aggression since WW2. But the nuclear deterrent known as MAD has kept the US from starting WW3.

That makes no sense.

It's my perception that America is coming closer to becoming a fascist threat to world peace, as it becomes more and more similar to other fascist threats in history. America has lost the economic war to China and has nowhere to turn but to military force.
China won't lose a fullscale war against America and will turn to nuclear arms instead of losing. China's world leading technology is already raising questions on whether or not America could mount a successful attack or indeed defend itself in a nuclear war.
And you want me to think of Americans pretending to be cowboys with guns, being a factor??


I'm thanking China for it's deterrent to US aggression in the rest of the 21st. century. On account of both Russia and China, America's PNAC agenda of world domination has been halted in its tracks!
What 50 million Americans do with their guns against the other 50 million, is a question you've raised that deserves further discussion. Keep it within the bounds of civility and maybe we can go there.

So, Canada is our enemy?

Good.

Operation: Canadian Bacon is about to commence......EH!!!

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Sure, Choadbreath...

That doesn't show anyone shot in the back. It shows someone laying on their back that had been shot in the head.