Kyle Rittenhouse FLEES from a group of students w/dog in tow after being asked a few questions

I had a fair amount of sympathy for Rittenhouse, initially. He seemed like a hapless teen, enamored with Rambo fantasies. Instead, I blamed those who invited a naive kid to enter a race riot armed with heavy weaponry.

Regardless, Rittenhouse has failed to rise above, or learn anything from, his mistakes. Now that he's milking them for an income, I can't really defend him at all.

He didn't make a mistake. He shot 3 people attacking him.
 
As usual conservatives attempt to defend the indefensible.
As usual, the liberal makes a false statement and can’t prove it’s true when called out in its veracity.

How did Kyle travel across state lines to murder blacks? The blacks and their enablers had been destroying property and assaulting people for months, and Kyle - in his naivety - thought he could protect his friend’s business.

He intent was not to murder anyone, blacks or otherwise. Three of the violent BLM rioters were trying to kill HIM, and he defended himself.
 
You’re the one who said the jury was racist, not me.

As for the “evidence” that was “withheld”, it was not pertinent to the charges of homicide and attempted homicide.

Besides all that, it was not withheld, the judge merely said it could not be used against Rittenhouse in the murder trial and he was right.

We have videotape of Rittenhouse shooting unarmed people. Only a racist jury would see that and say, "Naw, it'll be fine!"
 
As usual, the liberal makes a false statement and can’t prove it’s true when called out in its veracity.

How did Kyle travel across state lines to murder blacks? The blacks and their enablers had been destroying property and assaulting people for months, and Kyle - in his naivety - thought he could protect his friend’s business.

He intent was not to murder anyone, blacks or otherwise. Three of the violent BLM rioters were trying to kill HIM, and he defended himself.

Uh, you don't go out with a loaded AR-15 without the intent to murder someone.

Weepy McFlopsweat was caught on tape saying, he wanted to shoot black people. He was caught on film exchanging Nazi salutes with the Proud Boys.

The jury never got to hear any of that.
 
We have videotape of Rittenhouse shooting unarmed people. Only a racist jury would see that and say, "Naw, it'll be fine!"
No we do not have any such video tape you dishonest lying sack of shit

Only one of them was unarmed and he attempted to taske rittenhouse gun away

ANY intelligent jury would have seen all three attacks as lefitimatye reasons to iuse lethal force

Racism had nothing to do with it you absolutely stupid fool.'

Only a completely uneducated dumbfuck like you would have stuck racism intlo a shooting where everyone was white
 
Uh, you don't go out with a loaded AR-15 without the intent to murder someone.

Weepy McFlopsweat was caught on tape saying, he wanted to shoot black people. He was caught on film exchanging Nazi salutes with the Proud Boys.

The jury never got to hear any of that.
Yes you do you stupid motherfucker

There is NO iu]ntent estrablished by simply carrying a gun

You are an out right LIAR, There is no fucking tape any where of him saying any such thing.

He gave npo nazi salute in any tape

And even if he had it is not relebvant to the case
NO evidence was excluded THAT IS FACT
 
Shittenhouse was on tape saying he wished he could shoot a black man who was running out of a CVS.

That he only found white allies to shoot doesn't make the little shit any less racist.

He never said black man in that video you lying windbag.

He did nothing racist and they were not allies they were mindless rioters.

Racism is legal and even racists have the right to self defense

Sorry motherfucker but as always you are defatedand outed as a lying weasel by facts

The fact remains NO EVIDENCE was excluded
 
No, but the man he wanted to shoot was black. too bad the jury never got to hear it.
And a looter
]
So no racism

It was irrelevant to the case and rightfully excluded

You are not allowed to convict people based on their beliefs which is all you are about. Youy have lied and spun and posted crap because you hate rittenhouse's assumed beliefs

But you truly are a stupid uneducasted simpleton. You do not get to convict people based on a belief that they are racist. Racism is legal and racists habve the right to defend themselves

The question was never what rittenhouse believes it is about what he did and what he did was to defend himself.

That is fact

No evidence was excluded you lying trash bag
 
I still feel kind-of bad for the kid.

White wing freaks have been pumping his 'nads for a few years. He is probably delusional, insomuch as his self image.

But in the end, he's just the scared little halfwit who cosplayed himself into his fantasy, thanks to the unethical and immoral adults around him.
MarcATL


 
What do you mean no questions? he was aquitted , so at the very least.. there ARE questions. This was the aftermath of what happens when you have riots take over cities. Its not lke Rittenhouse just committed murders in a vacuum here.
Wether or not I agree with his decision as a 17 year old to be out with a Rifle... he did not instigate contact. He was approached first and someone tried to grab his weapon.... later someone hit him with a skate board and had him on the ground. So for you to claim he is a murderer without question takes away all credibility from you. riddiculous .

We have a girl right now lying in a coma maye going to die from another girl bashing her head in the concrete.. In Rittenhouse's situation.. in which you were no where around to get a sense of what was going on.. I can clearly say there is Question that Rittenhouse may have feared for his life.
Only tough guy key board warriors woud say otherwise.

Rittenhouse broke curfew like the other bums still on the street. Boogsloo Bois and Proud Boys.
 
No evidence the guy was a looter. The only thing he saw was that he was running out of the CVS. Maybe he was running behind schedule.

Saw a black guy, assumed the worst, wanted to murder him. Racist.
yes they were looting

racist is irrelevant

he acted in self defense
 
Rittenhouse sought out black demonstrators with the intent of murdering them – that’s racism.

Indeed, Rittenhouse traveled to another state knowing he would encounter black demonstrators; going out of one’s way to murder individuals because of their race is in fact racism.

Rittenhouse sought out black demonstrators with the intent of murdering them – that’s racism.

All three assholes he shot were white.

going out of one’s way to murder individuals because of their race is in fact racism.

He's an anti-white racist? Like you?
 

Forum List

Back
Top