Kyle Rittenhouse FLEES from a group of students w/dog in tow after being asked a few questions

[Soupnazi630]

The "judge", if you can call him that, in the case practically screamed at the courtroom saying "my son my son! you people better not call him nothing but my son!"

The bastard didn't even want them using the legal term of "shooter", he didn't put his thumb on the scale, he sat his big fat ass on the scale and jumped up and down on it.

There is no such quote in the transcript

He never excluded the word shooter


You are posting lies

 

[MarcATL]

There is no such quote in the transcript

He never excluded the word shooter


You are posting lies

 

[Soupnazi630]

Nothing in that video disputes the lies you posted about the judge

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Oh, it's completely relevant. Juries and trials can be racist as shit. Especially when the judge excludes evidence of guilt.

Kyle's jury was racist?

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Oh, it's completely relevant. Juries and trials can be racist as shit. Especially when the judge excludes evidence of guilt.

Irrelevant. You need to prove the jury and trial were racist in this case.

 

[JoeB131]

Irrelevant. You need to prove the jury and trial were racist in this case.

I think you can easily draw that conclusion... although you can't entirely blame the jury, given how much evidence was withheld from them by Judge Senile.

 

[dblack]

I had a fair amount of sympathy for Rittenhouse, initially. He seemed like a hapless teen, enamored with Rambo fantasies. Instead, I blamed those who invited a naive kid to enter a race riot armed with heavy weaponry.

Regardless, Rittenhouse has failed to rise above, or learn anything from, his mistakes. Now that he's milking them for an income, I can't really defend him at all.

 

[struth]

One thing is for sure, the demafasict brownshirts learned not to chase after him

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

I think you can easily draw that conclusion... although you can't entirely blame the jury, given how much evidence was withheld from them by Judge Senile.

You’re the one who said the jury was racist, not me.

As for the “evidence” that was “withheld”, it was not pertinent to the charges of homicide and attempted homicide.

Besides all that, it was not withheld, the judge merely said it could not be used against Rittenhouse in the murder trial and he was right.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

I had a fair amount of sympathy for Rittenhouse, initially. He seemed like a hapless teen, enamored with Rambo fantasies. Instead, I blamed those who invited a naive kid to enter a race riot armed with heavy weaponry.

Who invited him?

Regardless, Rittenhouse has failed to rise above, or learn anything from, his mistakes. Now that he's milking them for an income, I can't really defend him at all.

What mistake did he make?

 

[Soupnazi630]

I think you can easily draw that conclusion... although you can't entirely blame the jury, given how much evidence was withheld from them by Judge Senile.

None was withheld and your conclusion is unsupported

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Lie.

As usual conservatives attempt to defend the indefensible.

 

[Soupnazi630]

As usual conservatives attempt to defend the indefensible.

The evidence proves he acted in self defense which is defensible

Your claim is a childish lie

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

As usual conservatives attempt to defend the indefensible.

Explain why you say it’s indefensible.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Your allegation is unsupportable

“Racism” is just the standard lib lie

And he’s certainly no coward

Rittenhouse sought out black demonstrators with the intent of murdering them – that’s racism.

Indeed, Rittenhouse traveled to another state knowing he would encounter black demonstrators; going out of one’s way to murder individuals because of their race is in fact racism.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Rittenhouse sought out black demonstrators with the intent of murdering them – that’s racism.

Indeed, Rittenhouse traveled to another state knowing he would encounter black demonstrators; going out of one’s way to murder individuals because of their race is in fact racism.

You are a liar

He sought out no one of the sort

He sought out no one to murder but only shot white guys in self defense. Those are facts

they were rioters not demonstrators

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The evidence proves he acted in self defense which is defensible

Your claim is a childish lie

Rittenhouse’s acts of racism are indefensible, as are conservatives’ attempt to defend those acts.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Rittenhouse sought out black demonstrators with the intent of murdering them – that’s racism.

Proof?

Indeed, Rittenhouse traveled to another state knowing he would encounter black demonstrators; going out of one’s way to murder individuals because of their race is in fact racism.

It would be racist if it were true. It is not.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Rittenhouse’s acts of racism are indefensible, as are conservatives’ attempt to defend those acts.

You have never posted any racist acts he commited.

you have only posted proven lies

 

[Mac-7]

Rittenhouse’s acts of racism are indefensible, as are conservatives’ attempt to defend those acts.

As Soupnazi630 and others here have pointed out, you are not telling the truth

The only question is whether you believe your lies or not