Kyle Rittenhouse defense again tries, fails to get gun possession charge dropped

You are claiming the man on the left is the prosecutor, and he is clearly at table at ground floor, and not the elevated witness on the witness stand.
The other prosecutor is also at the prosecution table, so can not be the person on the right, who is elevated.
So then the elevated person to the right has to be the person testifying.
Which is not Grosskreutz.

Have you ever heard of an assistant?
The dweeb with the hokey mustache and beard is the lead,the fat dude is the assistant prosecutor.
You can continue to be a dumbass and I can continue to prove your wrong.
It's up to you.
 
Have you ever heard of an assistant?
The dweeb with the hokey mustache and beard is the lead,the fat dude is the assistant prosecutor.
You can continue to be a dumbass and I can continue to prove your wrong.
It's up to you.

Can you not read?
Obviously the 2 at the prosecutor's table are NOT the ones testifying on the witness stand.
The witness stand is elevated.
They guy on the right is in the elevated witness stand, and clearly that is not Grosskreutz.
 
Can you not read?
Obviously the 2 at the prosecutor's table are NOT the ones testifying on the witness stand.
The witness stand is elevated.
They guy on the right is in the elevated witness stand, and clearly that is not Grosskreutz.

Are you really trying to say grossnuts didnt pull a firearm?
 
Are you really trying to say grossnuts didnt pull a firearm?
Sure he pulled a firearm, but after pointing it at Kyle, and Kyle trying shoot him, he instead pointed his gun upward and raised his hands.
But then Kyle reracked and fired anyway, hitting Grosskneutz in the raised arm, forever proving he had his arms raised when shot.
 
And are you actually going to claim a minor can legally have a loaded firearm in public?
Then explain why the police immediately shot and killed 12 year old Tamir Rice playing with his air soft toy?
A 17 year old can. You are probably unaware that in the US a 17 year old can enlist in the military, you being a foreigner and all.
 
FElzjWvXoAAOkE7.webp
 
A 17 year old can. You are probably unaware that in the US a 17 year old can enlist in the military, you being a foreigner and all.

Enlisting in the military is listed as one of the exceptions that allows a minor to be in possession of a firearm, but then the military trains and supervises him.

And no, was born in WI, so I know the laws there quite well.

It is also legal for a minor to be in possession at a range, under adult supervision, or while hunting with a valid license.
 
The jury never got all the facts.
For example, if the jury had been told that possession of the rifle by a minor was illegal, then they likely would have seen Kyle's actions in a different light.

Likewise,
If America had been told that Biden was an inept imbecile and a puppet for oligarchs and that possession of the nuclear codes by said imbecile is a threat to all of mankind, they would have seen Biden's run for office as the cluster fuck it is.

IF...IF...IF
 
Here is your image again.

1637516803256-png.566854


And no, clearly Grosskreutz is not in the image.
The person who appears to be on the witness stand, appears to be bald.

And that is not the judge.
Here is the judge.

1000.jpeg


Moron...that is the defense attorney.........

Get help.
 
The jury never got all the facts.
For example, if the jury had been told that possession of the rifle by a minor was illegal, then they likely would have seen Kyle's actions in a different light.


The possession wasn't illegal, doofus........

Now you are simply being a troll...
 
First of all, Grosskreutz was not a felon but an official Medtech, and he did not attack Kyle, but went over to investigate because it looked like Kyle was the was the attacker.

Grosscrud was a felon, had his juvenile record expunged when he turned 18....he was a felon.
 
The jury never got all the facts.
For example, if the jury had been told that possession of the rifle by a minor was illegal, then they likely would have seen Kyle's actions in a different light.

You speak of "facts" but then demand the state continue the prosecution of a law not broken, a crime not committed . . . How is that giving the jury "facts"?

What you are advocating for is withholding "facts" and trying to get the jury to see "Kyle's actions in a different light", a light distorted by deception and prosecutorial misconduct.

You know that the prosecutor's job is to achive justice, not just get a conviction at any cost, in any manner, right?
 
If that is the defense attorney, then there is no way for anyone to claim who is testifying at that moment.


You were shown two separate videos of gross crud on the stand....what is wrong with you?
 
First of all, Grosskreutz was not a felon but an official Medtech, and he did not attack Kyle, but went over to investigate because it looked like Kyle was the was the attacker.

He has a long criminal history ya dumbshit.


 
Back
Top Bottom