Kyle Rittenhouse defense again tries, fails to get gun possession charge dropped

Kyle was attacked by four people, killed two, stopped a third. The smartest one ran away when shots were fired.
 
It was illegal for Rittenhouse to even buy or have the rifle, and he would have been safe if he had stayed on private property, with the others against the riot/demo.
What he did was not just illegal, but incredibly irresponsible and foolish.
You NEVER chamber rounds around a group of people.
He would have been kicked out of any range go to.

Than why did the judge dismiss the charges dimwit?
 
And you don't need a lot of training to use a gun effectively........so the whole anti-gun tactic of demanding mandatory training is just that, a tactic to make it harder for normal people to own guns...

You need more training then Kyle had.
You never take a loaded gun into a crowd.
There is no gun that is without risk of going off if dropped.
 
Kyle was attacked by four people, killed two, stopped a third. The smartest one ran away when shots were fired.


Kyle showed amazing self-control and restraint. He didn't spray the crowd with bullets. He shot his attackers when they closed in on him to "cranium" or kill him.
 
You need more training then Kyle had.
You never take a loaded gun into a crowd.
There is no gun that is without risk of going off if dropped.

There is no gun that is without risk of going off if dropped.


True....but modern weapons only fire if dropped when they have a design screw up......most modern weapons are drop safe...and are tested to be drop safe...
 
Wrong.
That was not complete, in sequence, or the relevant parts.
The is the InfoWars version.

The real version says Kyle's gun jammed, and Grosskreutz could easily have killed Kyle if he wanted, but instead raised his hands.
But Kyle racked to recock, and shot him anyway.

{...
During the demonstration, Grosskreutz held a water bottle in his left hand, where his cellphone was, and a portable microphone stood in for the gun in his right. He held the mic up near his ear.
...
Grosskreutz said he had come alone to Kenosha that night, to provide assistance to demonstrators. A trained paramedic, he said he had been going to protests to do so all summer.

"Is that how you'd hold a firearm if you were going to shoot it?" Binger asked. He said no.

Chirafisi countered with a photo of Grosskreutz just as the bullet hit his arm. It's lower, and the gun is more oriented toward Rittenhouse, though not directly aimed in an outstretched arm.
...}
Not only was Grosskreutz a paramedic, but was wearing a well identified paramedic uniform when Kyle shot him.
If Rittenhouse's rifle had jammed and he had to cycle the action, where did the ejected round go? There was no ejected round because all the videos clearly show Rittenhouse never cycled the action on his rifle. The movements are unmistakable. I know, I carried the real Assault Rifle version of the AR-15, the M-16 for five years on active duty and six years in the active reserves. Grosskreutz never testified that Rittenhouse's rifle jammed, or the he cycled the action. The only unfired round found at the scene belonged to the Glock and it was from when the cops cleared the weapon after the shooting. Everything you are lying about is on video, either directly from the night in question or from live court TV unedited. I know you can't embarrass yourself because you have proven that you are beyond rational thought or feelings, but stop beating a dead horse. the trial is over, Kyle was acquitted on all charges and he's free as a bird.
 
Wrong.
That was not complete, in sequence, or the relevant parts.
The is the InfoWars version.

The real version says Kyle's gun jammed, and Grosskreutz could easily have killed Kyle if he wanted, but instead raised his hands.
But Kyle racked to recock, and shot him anyway.

{...
During the demonstration, Grosskreutz held a water bottle in his left hand, where his cellphone was, and a portable microphone stood in for the gun in his right. He held the mic up near his ear.
...
Grosskreutz said he had come alone to Kenosha that night, to provide assistance to demonstrators. A trained paramedic, he said he had been going to protests to do so all summer.

"Is that how you'd hold a firearm if you were going to shoot it?" Binger asked. He said no.

Chirafisi countered with a photo of Grosskreutz just as the bullet hit his arm. It's lower, and the gun is more oriented toward Rittenhouse, though not directly aimed in an outstretched arm.
...}
Not only was Grosskreutz a paramedic, but was wearing a well identified paramedic uniform when Kyle shot him.
I'm sure you can go on and on about the moon landing being faked as well.
 
You need more training then Kyle had.
What the hell are you talking about Moon Bat? You are confused as usual.

Kyle performed magnificently.

He chased the first attacker off with two shots. Killed the second attacker, killed the third attacker and incapacitated the forth attacker all with only eight shoots.

He did not hit any bystanders and he disengaged without further causalities.

All while on his back.

They need to make him an officer in the Marine Corps and put him in charge of live fire close quarter combat training.
 
And you don't need a lot of training to use a gun effectively........so the whole anti-gun tactic of demanding mandatory training is just that, a tactic to make it harder for normal people to own guns...
I'm in favor of every student receiving gun safety training in school, after all you never know when you might run across a gun lying in the street unattended.
 
The judge had no basis in fact or law to dismiss the illegal possession by a minor charge.
It was the single most guilty I had ever heard of, except unless if he had been even younger.

The facts ARE that is was illegal for Kyle to be in possession of any firearm, while not at a range, not under adult supervision, not hunting with a valid permit, etc.
That is absolute, incontrovertible, and the only possible rational interpretation of very easy to read laws.
Otherwise it would have been illegal to shoot Tamir Rice even if he had a real firearm.

yeah...because you know more than a judge does when it comes to the law.
Just shut the fuck up ya imbecile.
 
Nope,thats him.

Here is your image again.

1637516803256-png.566854


And no, clearly Grosskreutz is not in the image.
The person who appears to be on the witness stand, appears to be bald.

And that is not the judge.
Here is the judge.

1000.jpeg
 
Last edited:
That image is of the prosecutor you retard.

You are claiming the man on the left is the prosecutor, and he is clearly at table at ground floor, and not the elevated witness on the witness stand.
The other prosecutor is also at the prosecution table, so can not be the person on the right, who is elevated.
So then the elevated person to the right has to be the person testifying.
Which is not Grosskreutz.
 
Back
Top Bottom