Kyl;e Rittenhouse will be a billionaire by the time his lawyers are done.

[EvilCat Breath]

Correct, the killings and wounding were never in doubt, the only issue was if the shootings were legally justified. The not guilty verdict established that beyond question.

It's like the admission never happened or was considered.

 

[JoeB131]

Not so far. Where are all these civil suits?

Here you go..

Denver Attorney Files Civil Action In Kyle Rittenhouse Shooting

Fallout from what happened on an August 2020 night in Kenosha, Wisconsin is not over. There's more legal action ahead.

denver.cbslocal.com

Correct, the killings and wounding were never in doubt, the only issue was if the shootings were legally justified. The not guilty verdict established that beyond question.

No, it just proved they couldn't find beyond a reasonable doubt that it wasn't justified...

Not the same thing as a civil case, where all they have to prove is that Rittenhouse acted recklessly.

You see, the problem with the criminal case is that it was ONLY limited to the moments of the shootings. A civil case can and will look at the entirety of Rittenhouses actions, including getting the gun, crossing state lines, etc.

More to the point, there are other parties that hold joint liability, such as the City of Kenosha or perhaps even Facebook for allowing the Kenosha Militia to organize on their pages. Juries love people with deep pockets.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

You will see. But not understand.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Here you go..

https://denver.cbslocal.com/2021/11...l-action-kyle-rittenhouse-shooting/ [/QUOTE]

No, it just proved they couldn't find beyond a reasonable doubt that it wasn't justified...

Not the same thing as a civil case, where all they have to prove is that Rittenhouse acted recklessly.

You see, the problem with the criminal case is that it was ONLY limited to the moments of the shootings. A civil case can and will look at the entirety of Rittenhouses actions, including getting the gun, crossing state lines, etc.

More to the point, there are other parties that hold joint liability, such as the City of Kenosha or perhaps even Facebook for allowing the Kenosha Militia to organize on their pages. Juries love people with deep pockets.

e-rittenhouse-shooting/[/URL]


No, it just proved they couldn't find beyond a reasonable doubt that it wasn't justified...

Not the same thing as a civil case, where all they have to prove is that Rittenhouse acted recklessly.

You see, the problem with the criminal case is that it was ONLY limited to the moments of the shootings. A civil case can and will look at the entirety of Rittenhouses actions, including getting the gun, crossing state lines, etc.

More to the point, there are other parties that hold joint liability, such as the City of Kenosha or perhaps even Facebook for allowing the Kenosha Militia to organize on their pages. Juries love people with deep pockets.

You might notice that they had to go all the way to Colorado to find an attorney to take the case. I looked up the lawyer. He has very little experience, he is a Poli-Sci grad, he runs a firm helping startup businesses, recently he's branched out into "civil rights" his major accomplishment has been being involved in a case restricting the Denver PD use of tear gas and rubber bullets against rioters. In other words he's an ambulance chaser with political aspirations. As far as I can tell he's not even licensed to practice law in Wisconsin.

 

[JoeB131]

You might notice that they had to go all the way to Colorado to find an attorney to take the case. I looked up the lawyer. He has very little experience, he is a Poli-Sci grad, he runs a firm helping startup businesses, recently he's branched out into "civil rights" his major accomplishment has been being involved in a case restricting the Denver PD use of tear gas and rubber bullets against rioters. In other words he's an ambulance chaser with political aspirations. As far as I can tell he's not even licensed to practice law in Wisconsin.

Again, sounds pretty good. Who'd want a lawyer from Wisconsin... if the Rittenhouse Trial is an indication of the level of legal juris prudence, it is clear the judge and prosecutors were both morons.

Point is, lawsuits will be filed... and Rittenhouse and Kenosha will lose...

 

[AZrailwhale]

Again, sounds pretty good. Who'd want a lawyer from Wisconsin... if the Rittenhouse Trial is an indication of the level of legal juris prudence, it is clear the judge and prosecutors were both morons.

Point is, lawsuits will be filed... and Rittenhouse and Kenosha will lose...

We'll see.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Why is he lucky if he didn't break any law?

Because she and the rest of the lynch mob were out for his blood, and he managed to escape their evil.

 

[Cecilie1200]

He got a quarter million from WaPo alone.

Washington Post settles $250M suit with Covington teen Nick Sandmann

The Washington Post on Friday agreed to settle a monster $250 million lawsuit filed by Covington Catholic High School student Nick Sandmann over its botched coverage of his 2019 encounter with a Na…

nypost.com

No, he didn't. He sued them for $250 million, but they wouldn't have settled for the full amount, because there would have been no reason to do so. If it's going to cost you the same amount either way, you go ahead and take your chances in court. But they settled for a substantial part of what he was asking, because otherwise HE would have had no reason to settle.

 

[Indeependent]

Because she and the rest of the lynch mob were out for his blood, and he managed to escape their evil.

I was responding to the mentally lll jillian.

 

[Cecilie1200]

It's also very possible that he actually settled for MORE than than suit amounts.
These are unprecdedented times right now.

The CEOs at CNN, NBC and everywhere else would get together & decide " Give the kid what he wants so this goes away fast."

No, it's really not. There's REALLY no reason for the Washington Post to settle for MORE than they could have lost in court.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I was responding to the mentally lll jillian.

Thank you for explaining what I already knew. I'm giving you the REAL answer that she'll try to hide behind bullshit and vitriol.

 

[Viktor]

Why is he lucky if he didn't break any law?

Technically, he broke a law, but he was acquitted because he had an excellent defense.

 

[westwall]

Again, sounds pretty good. Who'd want a lawyer from Wisconsin... if the Rittenhouse Trial is an indication of the level of legal juris prudence, it is clear the judge and prosecutors were both morons.

Point is, lawsuits will be filed... and Rittenhouse and Kenosha will lose...

You have a piss poor track record for predictions, so Kyle will win, and the rest of your morons will lose.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Technically, he broke a law, but he was acquitted because he had an excellent defense.

And which law was that?

 

[westwall]

Technically, he broke a law, but he was acquitted because he had an excellent defense.

Which law was that?

 

[surada]

And which law was that?

Curfew.

 

[Ringtone]

That little pos is lucky he isn’t in jail til he’s 50

You're a drooling 'tard of a raving lunatic.

 

[the other mike]

No, it's really not. There's REALLY no reason for the Washington Post to settle for MORE than they could have lost in court.

Reason is out the window when it comes to the globalists agenda, and they'll spare no expense in fulfilling it.

 

[westwall]

Curfew.

Wrong. He was on his friends property by request.

DURRRRR

 

[JoeB131]

Wrong. He was on his friends property by request.

DURRRRR

Actually, the owners of the car lot said they never told the Self-style militia to show up.