Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Actually, the criminal behavior of the victims would be irrelevant.
People have collected for injuries incurred even when committing crimes, such as the trespasser who was injured when he fell through a skylight at a school.
Nobody believes you were ever a lawyer...
Not in a civil case.
Kyle did an extended interview yesterday. He was cool, funny and didn't seem to a bit afraid of any of you stupid Moon Bat's hate.
"I wanna go against corrupt piece of shit prosecutors like Thomas Binger and put them in their place and make sure they never practice law again."
Actually, exactly in a civil case
The burglar and the skylight: another debunking that isn't - Overlawyered
Bizarro-Overlawyered is upset about the fact that a legislator, over twenty years ago, mentioned a lawsuit involving “a burglar [that] fell through a skylight and injured himself only to recover thousands of dollars from the owner of the skylight,” and points to this MS Word account of the case...www.overlawyered.com
Except if one actually goes to the document, buried within a lot of rhetoric criticizing reformers for mentioning the Bodine lawsuit, we learn: Ricky Bodine was a 19-year-old high-school graduate who, with three other friends (one of whom had a criminal record), decided the night of March 1, 1982, to steal a floodlight from the roof of the Enterprise High School gymnasium. Ricky climbed the roof, removed the floodlight, lowered it to the ground to his friends, and, as he was walking across the roof (perhaps to steal a second floodlight), he fell through the skylight. Bodine suffered terrible injuries to be sure, though one questions the relevance: if the school is legally responsible for burglars’ safety, it doesn’t matter whether Bodine stubbed a toe or, as actually happened, became a spastic quadriplegic. But I fail to see what it is that reformers are supposedly misrepresenting. A burglar fell through a skylight, and sued the owner of the skylight for his injuries. Bodine sued for $8 million (in 1984 dollars, about $16 million today) and settled for the nuisance sum of $260,000 plus $1200/month for life, about the equivalent of a million dollars in conservatively-estimated 2006 present value.
So, if he could collect from the school for his own negligence...
collecting from a reckless town and their "deputized" militia man... is going to be pretty easy.
Actually, he needs to shut up and go away...he's just digging himself in deeper.
My brother? Hey, you used to be a mod, you know attacking family members is against the rules, right?Your brother didn't have a Court ruling saying he committed no crime.
No Moon Bat, you are confused.
He is an American hero and he will be more successful in his life than stupid uneducated Moon Bats like you could ever dream to be.
www.cbsnews.com
My brother? Hey, you used to be a mod, you know attacking family members is against the rules, right?
So let's try again. Civil damages are different than criminal ones. You can have committed NO CRIME and yet still be held responsible for negligence. The standard is "not engaging in activity a sensible person would avoid".
A sensible person would not go to a riot with a gun in another state.
So back in the real world.
No college will take him.
No job will hire him.
Eventually, he'll be sued civilly by the people he killed/injured
Even he is starting to walk it back, saying he regrets what happened that day.
Kyle Rittenhouse regrets going to Kenosha on night of 2020 protest, his mother says
Kyle Rittenhouse claims he acted in self-defense when he killed two people and wounded a third.
Of course he regrets having to be put through all the shit he had to go through.
If you had bothered to look at the video that I posted you could hear the words that he said himself. He said that if he had to do all over again he would have stayed at home but he does not regret defending himself against the vicious attack.
He never should have been charged with a crime in the first place. It was the Democrat filth in the Prosecutor's office that charged him despite there being overwhelming video evidence and eyewitness testimony that he acted in self defense.
Liberals are assholes and charging Kyle for defending himself was a despicable thing for the Liberal filth to do.
He gunned down three people. That's a crime. That an idiot prosecutor and a lunatic judge let him get away with it doesn't mean much.
So when blacks start gunning down white people because they felt 'Threatened", you are going to be okay with that, right?
He also said he was glad that he defended himself. Go look at the interview.Even he is starting to walk it back, saying he regrets what happened that day.
It wasn’t luck but the fact your trash that was rioting were breaking the law when they got shot…That little pos is lucky he isn’t in jail til he’s 50
I bet you still believe that Kyle drove up in a beat up pickup truck with General Lee flag on it while wearing a white pillow case and having a burning cross and lynched three young black school children that were skipping to school while singing Amazing Grace while spreading love and cheer, don’t you?He gunned down three people. That's a crime. That an idiot prosecutor and a lunatic judge let him get away with it doesn't mean much.
So when blacks start gunning down white people because they felt 'Threatened", you are going to be okay with that, right?
You are confused Moon Bat.
The jury that heard all the evidence said that he he didn't gun down anybody. They found that it was self defense. Go look it up. I shit you not.
The BLM filth had a record of gunning down people and destroying things and people like Kyle knew that and it was the reason they were armed when they went to protect property that the Democrat managed police refused to do.
I bet you still believe that Kyle drove up in a beat up pickup truck with General Lee flag on it while wearing a white pillow case and having a burning cross and lynched three young black school children that were skipping to school while singing Amazing Grace while spreading love and cheer, don’t you?
Kyle shot three criminals all that attacked or try to attack him and two died , and all three were white pieces of shit!
You can believe the moon is made of green cheese, but it isn’t true.The jury couldn't find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Not quite the same thing and completely irrelevant to a civil trial.
Except the only people shot that night were shot by Rittenhouse.
Naw, I believe he went across state lines with an illegal gun, violated curfew, shot a man he started a fight with, and when a crowd tried to take him into custody, he shot at three other people, killing one, wounding one.
When a Civil Court and a lawyer who knows what he's doing gets ahold of him, he'll be paying for it the rest of his sad loser life.
Not so far. Where are all these civil suits?Actually, exactly in a civil case
The burglar and the skylight: another debunking that isn't - Overlawyered
Bizarro-Overlawyered is upset about the fact that a legislator, over twenty years ago, mentioned a lawsuit involving “a burglar [that] fell through a skylight and injured himself only to recover thousands of dollars from the owner of the skylight,” and points to this MS Word account of the case...www.overlawyered.com
Except if one actually goes to the document, buried within a lot of rhetoric criticizing reformers for mentioning the Bodine lawsuit, we learn: Ricky Bodine was a 19-year-old high-school graduate who, with three other friends (one of whom had a criminal record), decided the night of March 1, 1982, to steal a floodlight from the roof of the Enterprise High School gymnasium. Ricky climbed the roof, removed the floodlight, lowered it to the ground to his friends, and, as he was walking across the roof (perhaps to steal a second floodlight), he fell through the skylight. Bodine suffered terrible injuries to be sure, though one questions the relevance: if the school is legally responsible for burglars’ safety, it doesn’t matter whether Bodine stubbed a toe or, as actually happened, became a spastic quadriplegic. But I fail to see what it is that reformers are supposedly misrepresenting. A burglar fell through a skylight, and sued the owner of the skylight for his injuries. Bodine sued for $8 million (in 1984 dollars, about $16 million today) and settled for the nuisance sum of $260,000 plus $1200/month for life, about the equivalent of a million dollars in conservatively-estimated 2006 present value.
So, if he could collect from the school for his own negligence...
collecting from a reckless town and their "deputized" militia man... is going to be pretty easy.
The jury wasn't looking for guilt. It never needed to be established.The jury couldn't find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Not quite the same thing and completely irrelevant to a civil trial.
Except the only people shot that night were shot by Rittenhouse.
Naw, I believe he went across state lines with an illegal gun, violated curfew, shot a man he started a fight with, and when a crowd tried to take him into custody, he shot at three other people, killing one, wounding one.
When a Civil Court and a lawyer who knows what he's doing gets ahold of him, he'll be paying for it the rest of his sad loser life.
It would be nice if you would get more than one of your facts correct. Rittenhouse, didn't cross state lines with any gun, let alone an illegal one. He didn't start any fights, that was Rosenbaum, and the crowd was trying to kill him, not take him into custody. As for the curfew, everybody there was violating it and even the police didn't seem to be taking it seriously.The jury couldn't find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Not quite the same thing and completely irrelevant to a civil trial.
Except the only people shot that night were shot by Rittenhouse.
Naw, I believe he went across state lines with an illegal gun, violated curfew, shot a man he started a fight with, and when a crowd tried to take him into custody, he shot at three other people, killing one, wounding one.
When a Civil Court and a lawyer who knows what he's doing gets ahold of him, he'll be paying for it the rest of his sad loser life.
Correct, the killings and wounding were never in doubt, the only issue was if the shootings were legally justified. The not guilty verdict established that beyond question.The jury wasn't looking for guilt. It never needed to be established.
