Failzero
Platinum Member
It started when 90+ Riot Cops did a “ Tactical Retreat “
From Florence & Normandy flashpoint of 92 LA Riots .
From Florence & Normandy flashpoint of 92 LA Riots .
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many cells do you want to waste on.
Like you guys always say, if it saves even one life........it's worth it.
But locking people up for merely having guns? Um, no, just not practical.
If he commits a crime with the gun, jail him. Stop letting them skate like the twit here in Chicago, Kim Foxx, likes to do.
Awesome. Get us five million more jail cells, and we can do that.Have a Gun ( Prohibited person) go to prison
Stop imprisoning non violent offenders and we have more than enough room for the animalsExcept Fox has a higher conviction rate than Anita Alvarez did...
She drops 29% of felony charges compared to 19% dropped by Alvarez.
But even that only tells part of the story, as the charges she's likely to drop are things like narcotics charges,
Awesome. Get us five million more jail cells, and we can do that.
So raiding Criminal Safe Houses and Gangbangers Drug dens and arresting criminals with guns is racis umkay ?Except Fox has a higher conviction rate than Anita Alvarez did...
She drops 29% of felony charges compared to 19% dropped by Alvarez.
But even that only tells part of the story, as the charges she's likely to drop are things like narcotics charges,
Awesome. Get us five million more jail cells, and we can do that.
Only 200 homicides a year by civilians are ruled as justified. It doesn't bump the number that much.
Except Fox has a higher conviction rate than Anita Alvarez did...
So raiding Criminal Safe Houses and Gangbangers Drug dens and arresting criminals with guns is racis umkay ?
Or mutual combat I think she called it. That was great!
No, it was a fair evaluation of the situation. Nobody could tell for certain who fired the first shot. So every person involved in that incident could credibly claim that one of the others did it, or blame it on one of the dead guys.
Why didn't she charge all of them?
So you support a complete gun ban, thereby disarming 100% of law-abiding citizens of 100% of their guns but then when criminals get caught still having guns, don't put them in jail. Wow. Can you imagine that world? Very scary.So lock up a murderer or rapist? Absolutely. And he violates his parole by merely having a gun, throw him back in. But locking people up for merely having guns? Um, no, just not practical.
Nikes and TVs used to calm a mob but, these days, it takes gold and designer bags. I'm not sure if that's just mobflation or if the mobs are just more angry.No, I mean let them loot and burn for a while. Get it out of their system.
That always calms down a mob.
It won't take 5 million more cells but it might take 500,000 more cells. By the time word gets out that possession of a gun actually gets you the 10 years promised - whether you're 14 or 44 years old, there will be far fewer gun arrests.Except Fox has a higher conviction rate than Anita Alvarez did...
She drops 29% of felony charges compared to 19% dropped by Alvarez.
But even that only tells part of the story, as the charges she's likely to drop are things like narcotics charges,
Awesome. Get us five million more jail cells, and we can do that.
But since most of those ins the shootouts are in possessions of illegal guns then they can still be charged - and I don't mean for felon in possession, but for possessing stolen guns.Actually, the entire war on drugs is stupid. It's like we learned not a fucking thing from Prohibition.
No, it was a fair evaluation of the situation. Nobody could tell for certain who fired the first shot. So every person involved in that incident could credibly claim that one of the others did it, or blame it on one of the dead guys.
Because the police couldn't tell her who fired the first shot. Whoever fired the first shot was guilty. Whoever fired the second shot was acting in "self-defense".
It won't take 5 million more cells but it might take 500,000 more cells. By the time word gets out that possession of a gun actually gets you the 10 years promised - whether you're 14 or 44 years old, there will be far fewer gun arrests.
The reason it will take 500K cells is that the Democrats have promised criminals that they won't go to jail and it's going to take hard time, very hard time, for a much larger number before the bad guys get the message than it would have taken had the Democrats enforced the law from the start. Had we always enforced the law then we'd be past that part.
But since most of those ins the shootouts are in possessions of illegal guns then they can still be charged - and I don't mean for felon in possession, but for possessing stolen guns.
None of these guys had priors preventing them from owning a gun?
If you're shooting in self-defense and you're hitting neighboring houses, no charges?
Throw them all in jail while you try to prove who fired first.
Did you manage to kill all the lawyers before you tried that? Because if the CPD couldn't tell Fox who shot first, then a lawyer is going to rush right to a judge and say, "Yer Honor, my client was only defending himself!" (It's funnier if I do the Chicago Lawyer accent).
Like you guys always say, if it saves even one life........it's worth it.
But locking people up for merely having guns? Um, no, just not practical.
If he commits a crime with the gun, jail him. Stop letting them skate like the twit here in Chicago, Kim Foxx, likes to do.
Yeah....see....joe knows they need the gang bangers shooting each other so that they can use those shootings to push gun control.....and if a gang member is in jail for 30 years for an illegal gun charge, he can't be shooting other young black males to give power to gun grabbing fanatics.....