Sun Devil 92
Diamond Member
- Apr 2, 2015
- 32,078
- 11,106
- 1,410
- Banned
- #1
Is Elizabeth Warren an Ideologue?
Not that she'll ever pull it off....but it's telling that she can't think of an alternative.
She's one of the ruling class who "knows better" and if she had her way, you'd be fucked.
Hold onto your seats....she's gonna get cream with this one.
From the article:
But on the biggest issue, Warren nailed herself to a coercive and unpopular position. She insisted on a âMedicare for Allâ program that would abolish all private insurance for basic health care. And she ruled out the idea that she might pivot to a voluntary alternativeâMedicare for All Who Want Itâthat would allow people to keep their private insurance if they preferred it. âI will not embrace a plan like âMedicare for all who can afford itâ that will leave behind millions of people,â the senator declared, using a pejorative term for the voluntary approach.
Warren gave two reasons why she couldnât tolerate nongovernment insurance. First, a private insurer could limit its coverage or reject a claim. âI will not embrace a plan that says people have great insurance right up until you get the diagnosis, and the insurance company says, âSorry, weâre not covering your expensive cancer treatments,â â she explained. Second, she argued that private insurers stay afloat by denying necessary care and that they otherwise contribute nothing to cost containment. âEvery dollar of profit that an insurance company made last year,â she told a CNN panel after the debate, âwas made by saying one word: No.â
When CNNâs Van Jones questioned the wisdom of coercing everyone into Medicare, Warren responded as though she didnât understand the objection. âPeople donât like to be forced,â Jones reminded the senator. âWhy is that good politics? Donât you think Americans are going to feel like youâre forcing something on them they donât want?â Rather than engage the question, Warren repeated her talking point: âWe should leave no one behind.â Jones persisted: âWhat about the people who ⌠want to have the freedom to opt out? Do you care about them and their freedom to opt out?â Again, Warren batted the question away. âWhat I care about,â she told Jones, âis that they donât get pushed outâ of being covered at all.
Not that she'll ever pull it off....but it's telling that she can't think of an alternative.
She's one of the ruling class who "knows better" and if she had her way, you'd be fucked.
Hold onto your seats....she's gonna get cream with this one.
From the article:
But on the biggest issue, Warren nailed herself to a coercive and unpopular position. She insisted on a âMedicare for Allâ program that would abolish all private insurance for basic health care. And she ruled out the idea that she might pivot to a voluntary alternativeâMedicare for All Who Want Itâthat would allow people to keep their private insurance if they preferred it. âI will not embrace a plan like âMedicare for all who can afford itâ that will leave behind millions of people,â the senator declared, using a pejorative term for the voluntary approach.
Warren gave two reasons why she couldnât tolerate nongovernment insurance. First, a private insurer could limit its coverage or reject a claim. âI will not embrace a plan that says people have great insurance right up until you get the diagnosis, and the insurance company says, âSorry, weâre not covering your expensive cancer treatments,â â she explained. Second, she argued that private insurers stay afloat by denying necessary care and that they otherwise contribute nothing to cost containment. âEvery dollar of profit that an insurance company made last year,â she told a CNN panel after the debate, âwas made by saying one word: No.â
When CNNâs Van Jones questioned the wisdom of coercing everyone into Medicare, Warren responded as though she didnât understand the objection. âPeople donât like to be forced,â Jones reminded the senator. âWhy is that good politics? Donât you think Americans are going to feel like youâre forcing something on them they donât want?â Rather than engage the question, Warren repeated her talking point: âWe should leave no one behind.â Jones persisted: âWhat about the people who ⌠want to have the freedom to opt out? Do you care about them and their freedom to opt out?â Again, Warren batted the question away. âWhat I care about,â she told Jones, âis that they donât get pushed outâ of being covered at all.