King Family Preventing an Honest Biography of MLK Because it wont Hide his Adultery

[Huey]

His adultry if it was is nobody's business but his wife.So all of you disparaging his good name,if you have no sin continue ,on.His wife forgave him,so whats the big deal.

 

[Synthaholic]

I agree with you that he was a great man!

The problem I have with is the fact that the family wants to omit the part that he was a womanizer....you can not do that and deliver a good and true bio....in that sense I agree with Oliver Stone point of view.... show the man warts and all.

100% correct.

Let the race haters and cowards wail and flail and fail all they want.

Warts and all!

So the new rule is that a person's personal flaws and dark secrets are A-OK as long as their politics are acceptable.

Got it.

 

[martybegan]

100% correct.

Let the race haters and cowards wail and flail and fail all they want.

Warts and all!

So the new rule is that a person's personal flaws and dark secrets are A-OK as long as their politics are acceptable.

Got it.

Nice dodge of the statement, dillhole.

 

[Publius1787]

His adultry if it was is nobody's business but his wife.So all of you disparaging his good name,if you have no sin continue ,on.His wife forgave him,so whats the big deal.

I get it. History should not be portrayed accurately.

 

[JakeStarkey]

[So the new rule is that a person's personal flaws and dark secrets are A-OK as long as their politics are acceptable.

Got it.

George Washington was a slave owner and tried to seduce his neighbor's wife.

Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner and had relations and children with and by his dead wife's slave half-sister.

Abraham Lincoln was not even a Deist but believed a Doom or Destiny that operated beyond the horizons of history.

Strom Thurmond was a racist who seduced black housekeepers and had children whom he hid from the public view.

Yet all of these men made positive contributions to American history.

MLK Jr is given the same pass.

And all the whining of the race haters like Marty and Publius means nothing, since they are dying off and not being replaced.

Good riddance to rubbish.

 

[Publius1787]

[So the new rule is that a person's personal flaws and dark secrets are A-OK as long as their politics are acceptable.

Got it.

George Washington was a slave owner and tried to seduce his neighbor's wife.

Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner and had relations and children with and by his dead wife's slave half-sister.

Abraham Lincoln was not even a Deist but believed a Doom or Destiny that operated beyond the horizons of history.

Strom Thurmond was a racist who seduced black housekeepers and had children whom he hid from the public view.

Yet all of these men made positive contributions to American history.

MLK Jr is given the same pass.

And all the whining of the race haters like Marty and Publius means nothing, since they are dying off and not being replaced.

Good riddance to rubbish.

Jefferson is not given a pass and the evidence is shaky at best.

 

[rdean]

yawn

 

[martybegan]

[So the new rule is that a person's personal flaws and dark secrets are A-OK as long as their politics are acceptable.

Got it.

George Washington was a slave owner and tried to seduce his neighbor's wife.

Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner and had relations and children with and by his dead wife's slave half-sister.

Abraham Lincoln was not even a Deist but believed a Doom or Destiny that operated beyond the horizons of history.

Strom Thurmond was a racist who seduced black housekeepers and had children whom he hid from the public view.

Yet all of these men made positive contributions to American history.

MLK Jr is given the same pass.

And all the whining of the race haters like Marty and Publius means nothing, since they are dying off and not being replaced.

Good riddance to rubbish.

The difference is you can talk about the earlier examples and not expect the house to come down on you.

Try that with MLK or any recent progressive hero.

And I fucking dare you to find a post where I can be called a "race hater"

 

[S.J.]

Historical figures are given a pass if they are black or liberal because history is written by liberals.

 

[JakeStarkey]

[So the new rule is that a person's personal flaws and dark secrets are A-OK as long as their politics are acceptable.

Got it.

George Washington was a slave owner and tried to seduce his neighbor's wife.

Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner and had relations and children with and by his dead wife's slave half-sister.

Abraham Lincoln was not even a Deist but believed a Doom or Destiny that operated beyond the horizons of history.

Strom Thurmond was a racist who seduced black housekeepers and had children whom he hid from the public view.

Yet all of these men made positive contributions to American history.

MLK Jr is given the same pass.

And all the whining of the race haters like Marty and Publius means nothing, since they are dying off and not being replaced.

Good riddance to rubbish.

Jefferson is not given a pass and the evidence is shaky at best.

Yes, Jefferson is recognized for his great contributions, yes, the evidence between the DNA and Fawn McKay Brodie's work with the plantation registers is, indeed, quite conclusive.

 

[JakeStarkey]

[So the new rule is that a person's personal flaws and dark secrets are A-OK as long as their politics are acceptable.

Got it.

George Washington was a slave owner and tried to seduce his neighbor's wife.

Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner and had relations and children with and by his dead wife's slave half-sister.

Abraham Lincoln was not even a Deist but believed a Doom or Destiny that operated beyond the horizons of history.

Strom Thurmond was a racist who seduced black housekeepers and had children whom he hid from the public view.

Yet all of these men made positive contributions to American history.

MLK Jr is given the same pass.

And all the whining of the race haters like Marty and Publius means nothing, since they are dying off and not being replaced.

Good riddance to rubbish.

The difference is you can talk about the earlier examples and not expect the house to come down on you.

Try that with MLK or any recent progressive hero.

And I fucking dare you to find a post where I can be called a "race hater"

You, like Publius, are a low information ignorant tool of the far right reactionary wing nut brigade.

I talked negatively of MLK's faults above and the house did not fall in.

And anyone can audit your posts and conclude you are a race hater and somehow think we can go back and things will be good in America.

We are moving forward into an ever more diverse and plural America; your dislike of that will change nothing.

 

[Publius1787]

George Washington was a slave owner and tried to seduce his neighbor's wife.

Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner and had relations and children with and by his dead wife's slave half-sister.

Abraham Lincoln was not even a Deist but believed a Doom or Destiny that operated beyond the horizons of history.

Strom Thurmond was a racist who seduced black housekeepers and had children whom he hid from the public view.

Yet all of these men made positive contributions to American history.

MLK Jr is given the same pass.

And all the whining of the race haters like Marty and Publius means nothing, since they are dying off and not being replaced.

Good riddance to rubbish.

Jefferson is not given a pass and the evidence is shaky at best.

Yes, Jefferson is recognized for his great contributions, yes, the evidence between the DNA and Fawn McKay Brodie's work with the plantation registers is, indeed, quite conclusive.

Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: A Brief Account « Thomas Jefferson?s Monticello

Since then, a committee commissioned by the Thomas Jefferson Heritage Society, after reviewing essentially the same material, reached different conclusions, namely that Sally Hemings was only a minor figure in Thomas Jefferson's life and that it is very unlikely he fathered any of her children. This committee also suggested in its report, issued in April 2001 and revised in 2011, that Jefferson's younger brother Randolph (1755-1815) was more likely the father of at least some of Sally Hemings's children.

Despite the inconclusiveness Jefferson was not given a pass.

 

[skye]

When Oliver Stone made "JFK" he didn't glossed over the fact that the President was a womanizer.... why should he not do the same with MLK?

What's fair is fair. What is the problem of telling it as it is?

 

[martybegan]

George Washington was a slave owner and tried to seduce his neighbor's wife.

Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner and had relations and children with and by his dead wife's slave half-sister.

Abraham Lincoln was not even a Deist but believed a Doom or Destiny that operated beyond the horizons of history.

Strom Thurmond was a racist who seduced black housekeepers and had children whom he hid from the public view.

Yet all of these men made positive contributions to American history.

MLK Jr is given the same pass.

And all the whining of the race haters like Marty and Publius means nothing, since they are dying off and not being replaced.

Good riddance to rubbish.

The difference is you can talk about the earlier examples and not expect the house to come down on you.

Try that with MLK or any recent progressive hero.

And I fucking dare you to find a post where I can be called a "race hater"

You, like Publius, are a low information ignorant tool of the far right reactionary wing nut brigade.

I talked negatively of MLK's faults above and the house did not fall in.

And anyone can audit your posts and conclude you are a race hater and somehow think we can go back and things will be good in America.

We are moving forward into an ever more diverse and plural America; your dislike of that will change nothing.

Not a single statement that proves I am in any way a race hater. Standard progressive drivel from a standard progressive being caught in a lie.

PROVE IT YOU FUCKING TOAD.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Marty, your attacks, your comments in this thread, and your posting history conclusively leads even a low intelligent person like you to conclude you are a racialist. Even if you do it in the cause of culture, that does not remove your racialist bias.

 

[martybegan]

Marty, your attacks, your comments in this thread, and your posting history conclusively leads even a low intelligent person like you to conclude you are a racialist. Even if you do it in the cause of culture, that does not remove your racialist bias.

More nonsense spewed from the one of the prime sources of nonsense on this board. and now its the term "racialist"?

Again, find a specific case on this board where I have posted anything racist, and make sure you explain why in its context it is racist.

You have been called out in this thread, and in the flamezone, motherfucker, see if you can respond.

 

[S.J.]

I don't think the King family's objective is to prevent the fact that he was a womanizer to come out. I think they're just afraid it would open the door to other information coming out, like his history of violence against women and his plagiarism. They don't care about the infidelity part, that's expected of black men.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yes, Marty, you are "one of the prime sources of nonsense on this board" when you buy into the crap trap of someone like Publius.

Whether here or in the Flame Zone, your racialism can't hide.

That you can't give a balanced discussion of King's merits and faults displays your inherit racialism.

So you don't get "just once more", racialist.

 

[HenryBHough]

Pot, meet kettle.

 

[martybegan]

Yes, Marty, you are "one of the prime sources of nonsense on this board" when you buy into the crap trap of someone like Publius.

Whether here or in the Flame Zone, your racialism can't hide.

That you can't give a balanced discussion of King's merits and faults displays your inherit racialism.

So you don't get "just once more", racialist.

My comment was on current progressives (mostly white, btw) who would blow up if anyone brought up any of MLK's downside on a real media outlet (not an anonymous message board you ass, real bravery on your part). My point had nothing to to with the veracity of any claims against MLK and his past, but of the double standard held by progressives in general when it comes to discussing the flaws of certain untouchable people.

Try reading a post before you open your spew-hole.