Kimmel Needs to Go

And?

Likely his PR person, or Disney, forced go to write that. We already know Kimmel hates anything right wing. His faux sympathy is likely forced.

Or, just covering his tracks.


If he is being genuine then good for him, but given his commentary over the years, he probably doesn’t care and what he said is what he had to say
Why would anyone make him write that? What has Kirk negatively ever said about Kirk?
 
Consequences of speech cannot include the government coming after you.

But that's what this administration is doing.
where did you get that idea? The Govt goes after people for their speech all the time....the FCC fines networks were certain langague is used on air....https://www.fcc.gov/enforcement/areas/broadcast-obscenity-indecency-profanity

You can even be jailed for making threats, or inciting violence
 
Yes, ultimately it is, but do you think they are going to refuse White House pressures? They are likely saying what they needed to say to protect the White House.

And you missed the part where Zuckerberg said the White House staff would call Facebook staff and curse and scream at the Facebook employees when they wanted content censored
Disney did. Shortly after bowing down to the Trump administration's threats, they put Kimmel back on. So no evidence of private corporations refusing to refuse the White House.
 
"Ultimately it was our decision whether to take content down or not, and we own our decisions"

You forgot to include that part.

Very dishonest.
Correct, they didn't have to, and could have risk the punishment from the XIden Demafascist regime.
 
The calls to violence by the demafacsit won't stop.....it's a threat to our republic and human life

 
No not lock up the sheep, but definitely like any law investigation goes - lock up or go after the source if confirmed to be messaging suggesting that Trump should be 86ed.

Every idiot occupying a bull horn, and running their mouths in ways that negatively effects our political health and harmony in this country needs to be called out for their nastiness along with stripping the bull horn from their evil nasty hands.
WHO gets to decide what is nasty or evil???????
 
WHO gets to decide what is nasty or evil???????

1777922536591.webp
 
15th post
Disney did. Shortly after bowing down to the Trump administration's threats, they put Kimmel back on. So no evidence of private corporations refusing to refuse the White House.

Yes, Disney refused trump, but people like Zuckerberg and Dorsey were not going to refuse biden
 
Damage control for what?

Sorry, meant to ask, what has Kimmel ever said negatively about Kirk?

Damage control for a tasteless joke that people might find offensive.

"We hit some new lows over the weekend," Kimmel said, "with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to score political points from it."

Kimmel playing the blame game, essentially saying “it’s their fault”.

Again, not something he should be punished over, he has free speech, but it came at the time when idiots were posting videos of themselves cheering and laughing and mocking Charlie Kirk’s death. So naturally it upset a lot of people.
 
Consequences of speech cannot include the government coming after you.

But that's what this administration is doing.
The government is the law and protectors of the constitution, so if you violate the constitution then expect government to not just sit quite about it.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom