Kimmel Needs to Go

[struth]

Dwmafascist. Get lost.

Dwmafascist. Get lost.

Oh I didn’t realize hoping you’d give up your ideology was name calling

Don’t get me wrong I can understand why you are offended by it, which is a step in the right direction.

 

[Clipper]

Oh I didn’t realize hoping you’d give up your ideology was name calling

Don’t get me wrong I can understand why you are offended by it, which is a step in the right direction.

F**k off & enjoy the trip.

Save your "prayers" for yourself, hypocrite.

 

[struth]

F**k off & enjoy the trip.

Save your "prayers" for yourself, hypocrite.

Thanks but I am not going on a trip anytime soon…we have been saving money and now that trump has actually reserved the skyrocketing interest rates you caused with your vote for xiden, we are buying a new home this year

 

[beagle9]

Disney thinks he's worthy of that space. So much so, they quickly brought him back after suspending him.

Disney ? Rotflmbo

They are POC these day's also.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Disney ? Rotflmbo

They are POC these day's also.

Yes, Disney. What's wrong with Disney? Disney is great, I love it. Was there recently and renewed my annual passes for my family.

 

[ThisIsMe]

There was nothing violent about Kimmel's joke.

I agree, I said it was tasteless.

I think Kimmel had every right to say what he said, I just want the left to remember this the next time someone on the right makes tasteless jokes.


Also, remember this when you say “you have the freedom of speech but not freedom from consequence”.

 

[Political-Junkie]

I agree, I said it was tasteless.

I think Kimmel had every right to say what he said, I just want the left to remember this the next time someone on the right makes tasteless jokes.


Also, remember this when you say “you have the freedom of speech but not freedom from consequence”.

Then why did you say 'but i don’t want to hear the left talk about violent rhetoric ever again'? That insinuates you believe the joke contained violence. And there's not typically much consequence from tasteless joke.

 

[beagle9]

Then why did you say 'but i don’t want to hear the left talk about violent rhetoric ever again'? That insinuates you believe the joke contained violence. And there's not typically much consequence from tasteless joke.

The left in context doesn't identify as being just one specific person, but it Identifies as being many person's...

Are you stupid ??

 

[ThisIsMe]

Then why did you say 'but i don’t want to hear the left talk about violent rhetoric ever again'? That insinuates you believe the joke contained violence. And there's not typically much consequence from tasteless joke.

Violent rhetoric, making light of people’s death. Again, you have to look at the totality of the actions of the left over the last few months.

 

[Political-Junkie]

The left in context doesn't identify as being just one specific person, but it Identifies as being many person's...

Are you stupid ??

His comment was about Kimmel's non-violent joke being violent.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Violent rhetoric, making light of people’s death. Again, you have to look at the totality of the actions of the left over the last few months.

We're talking about Kimmel's joke. That's what this thread is about.

 

[ThisIsMe]

We're talking about Kimmel's joke. That's what this thread is about.

Kimmels joke was in bad taste, considering his rhetoric surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death. Kimmel has the right to say what he wants, but, as you all like to say, “you have freedom of speech but not freedom from consequence “, which I personally think is BS, but, we’re playing by your rules.

I think what Kimmel said doesn’t rise to the level of taking him off air, but again, we’re just playing the game that you all play.

 

[Marener]

Kimmels joke was in bad taste, considering his rhetoric surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death. Kimmel has the right to say what he wants, but, as you all like to say, “you have freedom of speech but not freedom from consequence “, which I personally think is BS, but, we’re playing by your rules.

I think what Kimmel said doesn’t rise to the level of taking him off air, but again, we’re just playing the game that you all play.

Consequences of speech cannot include the government coming after you.

But that's what this administration is doing.

 

[Political-Junkie]

Kimmels joke was in bad taste, considering his rhetoric surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death. Kimmel has the right to say what he wants, but, as you all like to say, “you have freedom of speech but not freedom from consequence “, which I personally think is BS, but, we’re playing by your rules.

I think what Kimmel said doesn’t rise to the level of taking him off air, but again, we’re just playing the game that you all play.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Consequences of speech cannot include the government coming after you.

But that's what this administration is doing.

Why not? You all were all about it when Biden was telling Zuckerberg to silence right wingers

 

[ThisIsMe]

View attachment 1252235

And?

Likely his PR person, or Disney, forced go to write that. We already know Kimmel hates anything right wing. His faux sympathy is likely forced.

Or, just covering his tracks.


If he is being genuine then good for him, but given his commentary over the years, he probably doesn’t care and what he said is what he had to say

 

[Marener]

Why not? You all were all about it when Biden was telling Zuckerberg to silence right wingers

Zuckerberg decided who to silence, not Biden.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Zuckerberg decided who to silence, not Biden.

Zuckerberg admitted that the White House was telling them what to do.

Mark Zuckerberg says Biden officials would 'scream' and 'curse' when seeking removal of Facebook content

The Meta CEO said on a podcast that administration officials had asked the company to remove certain posts, including "things that are true."

www.nbcnews.com

And twitter:

FBI Influence: Internal Twitter documents (the "Twitter Files") and congressional testimony revealed that the FBI repeatedly warned social media companies in 2020 to look out for "hack-and-dump" operations by foreign actors, which directly influenced Twitter's decision to temporarily label the laptop story as "hacked material".

Facebook execs suppressed Hunter Biden laptop scandal to curry favor with Biden-Harris admin: bombshell report

WASHINGTON — The FBI warned major US tech companies ahead of The Post’s first reports on Hunter Biden’s laptop in October 2020 that Russian agents were preparing a strikingly similar document dump — and once the scoop materialized, Facebook executives discussed calibrating censorship decisions...

judiciary.house.gov

 

[Marener]

Zuckerberg admitted that the White House was telling them what to do.

Mark Zuckerberg says Biden officials would 'scream' and 'curse' when seeking removal of Facebook content

The Meta CEO said on a podcast that administration officials had asked the company to remove certain posts, including "things that are true."

www.nbcnews.com

And twitter:

Facebook execs suppressed Hunter Biden laptop scandal to curry favor with Biden-Harris admin: bombshell report

WASHINGTON — The FBI warned major US tech companies ahead of The Post’s first reports on Hunter Biden’s laptop in October 2020 that Russian agents were preparing a strikingly similar document dump — and once the scoop materialized, Facebook executives discussed calibrating censorship decisions...

judiciary.house.gov

"Ultimately it was our decision whether to take content down or not, and we own our decisions"

You forgot to include that part.

Very dishonest.

 

[ThisIsMe]

"Ultimately it was our decision whether to take content down or not, and we own our decisions"

You forgot to include that part.

Very dishonest.

Yes, ultimately it is, but do you think they are going to refuse White House pressures? They are likely saying what they needed to say to protect the White House.

And you missed the part where Zuckerberg said the White House staff would call Facebook staff and curse and scream at the Facebook employees when they wanted content censored