Kilmer Garcia

Show the clause of the Constitution giving district judges the powers to decide executive branch issues.

Hint: You won’t even find district judges in the Constitution, Simp.
Actually you will. The constitution gives congress the power to create courts below the supreme court. And congress did just that.

And as far as telling the executive what to do. That's from Marburry V Madison, where article 3 grants them the judicial power of the united states, which includes interpreting the constitution and it's laws.

Because even the executive has to follow the constitution and the laws of the land, the courts have jurisdiction.
 
Last edited:
Fiunding Father and 3rd President Thomas Jefferson favored a system where each branch of government could interpret the Constitution, with the ultimate authority resting with the people. He believed that the judiciary should not be the sole interpreter of the Constitution, and that the other branches should also have a say.

Unfortunately , activist judges have eroded that maxim.
Every branch does get to interpret the constitution. But when they get it wrong, the judicial branch is the one with the final say as to what the constitution or laws mean.

In fact the courts determined that Article 3 doesn't allow them to tell the executive they interpreted the law wrong, until somebody objects to their interpretation, and asks the court to render a judgement.
 
Last edited:
He is a member of MS-13
So a trial wasn't needed.
Just deport the guy back to his gang.
They'll take good care of him.
Not a trial, but an administrative hearing, in front of an administrative law judge. Like the one that ruled him non-deportable.
 
He is a member of MS-13
So a trial wasn't needed.
Just deport the guy back to his gang.
They'll take good care of him.

I'm pretty sure you're talking about a different case.

Because in the case she's talking about, Trump admitted the mistake. Due to an "administrative error."

At least that's what every news outlet has reported. :dunno:

 
Every branch does get to interpret the constitution. But when they get it wrong, the judicial branch is the one with the final say as to what the constitution or laws mean.

In fact the courts determined that Article 3 doesn't allow them to tell the executive they interpreted the law wrong, until somebody objects to their interpretation, and asks the court to render a judgement.
WHICH JUDGE TOLD OUR ALLEGED PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN THAT HE HAD NO CONSTITUTIONAL OR STATUTORY AUTHORITY TO OPEN THE BORDER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
WHICH JUDGE TOLD OUR ALLEGED PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN THAT HE HAD NO CONSTITUTIONAL OR STATUTORY AUTHORITY TO OPEN THE BORDER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Actually the constitution grants the president authority over the border and all intercourse with foreign nations.
 
If only Democrats loved America as much as they love illegal alien gangsters.
Democrats don’t love these illegal immigrant terrorists…. Democrats love what they believe terrorists can do for them. First, they believe by supporting terrorist gangs from El Salvador and Venezuela, it’s going to win Hispanic votes. What those dumb shits don’t realize is that the American Latino Community is most at risk with these violent animals. Next, maybe these terrorists are for hire and will be glad to Burn, Loot, and Maim communities.
 
He is a member of MS-13
So a trial wasn't needed.
Just deport the guy back to his gang.
They'll take good care of him.
According to some dude claiming he was a member of a gang in a state he had never been in.

A judge ruled that to be bogus and the administration admitted they were wrong
Why can’t you?
 
WHICH JUDGE TOLD OUR ALLEGED PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN THAT HE HAD NO CONSTITUTIONAL OR STATUTORY AUTHORITY TO OPEN THE BORDER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You fuckers just got done claiming that Obama and Biden sent back huge numbers of illegals. That was YESTERDAY

Open border your ass
 
You fuckers just got done claiming that Obama and Biden sent back huge numbers of illegals. That was YESTERDAY

Open border your ass
Yo Dingle Berry

Have you being living in a Foxhole for the past 4 years ?!?!?!?!?!?


Tom Homan has worked in immigration enforcement under six different presidents and says President Biden is the first president to unsecure the border on purpose.

 
Democrats don’t love these illegal immigrant terrorists…. Democrats love what they believe terrorists can do for them. First, they believe by supporting terrorist gangs from El Salvador and Venezuela, it’s going to win Hispanic votes. What those dumb shits don’t realize is that the American Latino Community is most at risk with these violent animals. Next, maybe these terrorists are for hire and will be glad to Burn, Loot, and Maim communities.

I think there's more to it than that. The thing that both sides aren't seeing is that the whole border problem has been used for the purpose of "Order out of Chaos." In other words, the government has allowed the problem to happen in order to have a pretext for pre-planned authoritarian agendas. Problem - Reaction - Solution.

Also, I think there has been an intentional government effort for many years now to push the idea of "domestic terrorists".... Again, as a pretext for bringing in more authoritarianism.

Anyone who is cheering this "domestic terrorist" stuff on is empowering the government, which is foolish because when the other "side" is in power again (or even maybe before that) the power you're giving the government now will be used against you and all of us. They've already falsely accused right-wingers of being "domestic terrorists" in the past. Anyone who thinks that's not going to happen again is being extremely naive.

Personally, I think it's a tag team sort of thing. Biden and the Democrats allow the problem to occur. Then Trump and the Republicans "come to the rescue" with the "solution" which eventually means mass surveillance, biometric tracking system, digital ID, the loss of more liberties. But that was the plan all along. Both sides are in on it.

By cheering this stuff on, you guys are unwittingly being used as useful pawns. And we all end up losing.
 
A judge ruled that to be bogus and the administration admitted they were wrong
Why can’t you?
There was a clerical error concerning his deportation date.
So what's the big deal?
The guy was sent back to live with his MS-13 buddies a little sooner than expected.
 
Last edited:
This is a guy with an American wife and kids who the Administration admits they wrongly deported and refuses to do anything to correct that


And if you read through that you’ll see that the only reason he was ever thought to be a gang member is because some “confidential informant” (usually criminals themselves getting paid for information) claimed he was affiliated with a gang in NY … where he has never been


HEEHEHEHEHE, such outrage. Just imagine, what if he and his friends were never let in to start with! YOUR guy let him in, your guy refused to deport him, and as usual, you want to blame everyone else but YOUR guy, lol.

You spin well, but you have already lost the debate-)
 
It means most of the executive positions were created by law, and as such controlled by law, not by the executive.
The president gets to fire the executives he picks, but not those created by a law of congress.
Did Congress create the US attorney offices?
 
Yeah, no different. Other than the murders and rapes and prostitution and the drug dealing and robberies and extortion and ....

Like White Men have never done any of those things?

Have you ever heard of the Mafia?

Seriously, give it up!
 
You shouldn’t let Huffpo tell you what to think.

When this POS was arguing to the court he shouldn’t be deported he said he would be in danger from rival gangs.

Dumbass.
Link?
 
Actually the constitution grants the president authority over the border and all intercourse with foreign nations.
So you support Trump;s deportation policy.

Good to know.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom