Ken Paxton announces voter fraud charges against county judge, and 5 others.

Science and data analytics prove massive voter fraud on the part of Democrats.
No. You can't accept the outcome, so you are desperately trying to explain it away. Come up with credible verifiable proof, and you'll have something.
 
Not at all, Everything he’s doing for Texas is good for America! And I get that bothers you cause you hate America
You're funny. Not as in HaHa, but as in odd.
 
LW deep state courts and judges will never go after big Election fraud like 2020. Yet the DOG he crows about show your proof. Proof was shown. Deep state Obiden judges denied any further look into it. Signature verification was turned off in ATL & PHX yet judges not interested you dumb Oxyen.

They ignore thousands sworn affidavits as they chirp on.
 
Nope. If they broke the law, they have to face the consequences. Even then, a handful of people (6) don't constitute widespread fraud.
You're the only on yapping about "widespread" fraud in connection with these arrests. Lame attempt at deflection.
 
one or two or even six examples don't constitute widespread fraud in an election of millions of votes. Where is your proof of fraud large enough to have made a difference in the election?
WTF are you talking about "my proof?"
 
Paxton is just another maga cult member desperately trying to find the next thing to please his orange cult leader. Doing what is best for Texas takes back seat to doing what is best for maga.
You just don't get it.

Your job is NOT to make Trump look bad. Or to make MAGA look bad.

Democrat popularity ratings will continue to be in the toilet as long as this keeps up.
 
No idea. That will be for the courts to decide. If they are guilty, they must pay. Anything wrong with that?

Really? Because it sounds to me you already decided.

"Paxton is just another maga cult member desperately trying to find the next thing to please his orange cult leader. Doing what is best for Texas takes back seat to doing what is best for maga."
 
one or two or even six examples don't constitute widespread fraud in an election of millions of votes. Where is your proof of fraud large enough to have made a difference in the election?
THAT is the essence of the Democrats' election fraud scheme. By engaging in a multiplicity of "irregularities" across a multiplicity of jurisdictions, they can make it impossible to obtain relief in civil courts. For example, the additional ten million unverified votes that Biden received in 2020 represented about 6% of the total ballots that were counted in the swing states. If only 4% of these ballots were fraudulent in the Georgia election, then Trump would have won that State. (6% x 5 million x 4% = 12,000 > 10,000 Biden margin.)

Now, let's suppose that the Democrats used only four different methods of vote fraud in that election (e.g., voter rolls, ballot harvesting, late submissions and lost/destroyed ballots. On average, each of these would only have accounted for 3,000 additional Biden votes. which would not have changed the election outcome. To challenge this outcome, the GOP would have to document every allegation of vote fraud in every precinct and county in Georgia, as well as the overall state tabulation. Then it would have to demonstrate that the same things occurred in enough other states to have changed the National election outcome. By the time this could be done, Biden and his administration would already been office for months if not years. No wonder the courts didn't want to hear all the cases that would have been involved.

This could be addressed by true election reform, but that is why the Democrats are so opposed to it.
 
Back
Top Bottom