Ken Burns Roosevelt Documentary

[Ropey]

You mean cite.

Now show your attack which then would call for a defense of the statements that you disagree with, rather than asking for proof that the statement exists when it exists here. Show it otherwise, in other words.

Without an attack on each and every proposal PC made, they stand without a cite.

Thank you for your valuable contribution to spell check.

Since you missed the more relevant portion... I have highlighted it for you.

Still, it wasn't a misspelled word. It was a failure to communicate the proper context to the word.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Really? Then explain how Stalin had any authority over FDR.

They were soul-mates.

1. He gave official recognition to Stalin in 1933
2. He provided lend lease largesse to Stalin far and above what was necessary
3. He allowed and encouraged Stalin's spies in his administration.
4. He insisted on a communist as his second vice president
5. He sent uranium and plans for the atomic bomb to Stalin
6. All of this with the foreknowledge that Stalin was a homicidal psychopath.
7. He acquiesced to d-day, not where his generals suggested, but where Stalin insisted.



What is your explanation for the above?

And...if your did your own research, and verified same....would you have had the courage to ask your history teachers/professors to explain their support of FDR in the face of these facts?

Would you?

Numbers two through seven are absolute bull shit, completely unsupported by any legitimate historians.

Wait...."completely unsupported by any legitimate historians"....you're pretending you have knowledge of history, much less "legitimate historians"?????


Your ignorance is hidden about as well as a bikini hides 45 pounds of ugly fat~


Now jot this down: never......never.....doubt what I post.
It is completely accurate, your biases notwithstanding.

Your outstanding characteristics, lying imbecile, are so obvious, that this post should come under the heading of 'beating a dead horse.'....

But I can't resist....my guilty pleasure.

Let's take the item that you claim....I eschew vulgar language, so I can't quote you, but with which you disagree vehemently....the one that should have ended any association Roosevelt considered with Stalin:

"6. All of this with the foreknowledge that Stalin was a homicidal psychopath."




Now...watch me make mincemeat out of you:

1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. On November 16, 1933, President Roosevelt rushed to embrace, endorse Stalin....and recognize the USSR.

If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational:
"Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his "Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath"by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.


2. Bear in mind, eight months earlier, journalist Gareth Jones had exposed Stalin's Terror Famine:
"In the train a Communist denied to me that there was a famine. I flung a crust of bread which I had been eating from my own supply into a spittoon. A peasant fellow-passenger fished it out and ravenously ate it." Gareth Jones journalist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

a. Malcolm Muggeridge "was the first writer to reveal the true nature of Stalin s regime when in 1933 he exposed the terror famine in the Ukraine. " Time and Eternity The Uncollected Writings of Malcolm Muggeridge Malcolm Muggeridge Nicholas Flynn 9781570759055 Amazon.com Books

b. So FDR knew of the Terror Famine...yet he enveloped Joe Stalin in " the cloak of his popularity..."
Time Magazine, December 17, 1934.


3. Check the timeline. FDR didn't embrace the USSR out of a need in a fight against Hitler....in fact, at that time, FDR had a rosy relationship with Germany. So....why overlook the genocide?

a. May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’



Did I just eat your lunch, or what????




Never doubt me again.


Never.

I still waiting for the part where you take all your superficial out of context characterizations and use them to explain how FDRs policies extended the Second World War.

I believe post #133 made clear to all what an ignorant slime bucket you are.

Right now you’re probably trying to brush something off your face…you didn’t realize it was the floor.

 

[Ropey]

Right now you’re probably trying to brush something off your face…you didn’t realize it was the floor.

He may have fallen while brushing your comeback off of his face.

 

[peach174]

Get out and travel a bit all you FDR detractors. His public works projects built thousands of beautiful post offices, court houses, and thousands of beautiful campgrounds for which I will ever be grateful. He put millions of people to work, including painters, writers, and poets. And look at the quality of what all those people produced. For his day, FDR probably pumped more American dollars back into America than any other president. His legacy is secure. He was a great president who loved this country. He didn't poison the wells like latter day democrat presidents. There was nothing hateful about the man.

Then why did he want to pack the court?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

A single cent of tax money used to subsidize lefty propaganda is too much.

Actual news accounts from the 1930s are "lefty propaganda"?

This is why the Right-Wing is a joke whom no one takes seriously, except other wingnuts.

It's how the accounts are framed. PBS is notoriously left wing. Left wingers' denial of that obvious reality is what makes anything they say dubious.

They are "framed" as the actual news stories and accounts from the 1930s. PBS isn't interpreting anything.

What is omitted is part of the framing. PBS is notoriously left wing.

 

[BullKurtz]

Has anyone been watching? It's fantastic and incredibly informative, even if you think you are familiar with their presidencies.

Every conservative should watch it (especially @PoliticalChic ). It will debunk all the garbage and revisionist history that dopes like the ones on this site continually try to sell.

No....all that got "debunked" was that Eleanor turned lesbian, FDR didn't have the Carrier Fleet away from Pearl by design....they were late returning, and he LIED to the Nation about his physical condition for over 12 years. Roosevelt pissed on the Constitution at every turn....as have those Rats who learned from him. Tried to stack the Supreme Court for blocking his socialist agenda, blamed his failures on the GOP, and kept a mistress for times Eleanor was away. She hated him...who does all this remind us of?

 

[peach174]

Get out and travel a bit all you FDR detractors. His public works projects built thousands of beautiful post offices, court houses, and thousands of beautiful campgrounds for which I will ever be grateful. He put millions of people to work, including painters, writers, and poets. And look at the quality of what all those people produced. For his day, FDR probably pumped more American dollars back into America than any other president. His legacy is secure. He was a great president who loved this country. He didn't poison the wells like latter day democrat presidents. There was nothing hateful about the man.

Then why did he want to pack the court?

That's poisoning the well of the Supreme Court.

 

[BullKurtz]

I've got to be in the right mood for a Burns doc.

Dude puts me to sleep with his droning monotone.

Peter Coyote....I think he and Burns take warm showers together.

 

[BullKurtz]

Get out and travel a bit all you FDR detractors. His public works projects built thousands of beautiful post offices, court houses, and thousands of beautiful campgrounds for which I will ever be grateful. He put millions of people to work, including painters, writers, and poets. And look at the quality of what all those people produced. For his day, FDR probably pumped more American dollars back into America than any other president. His legacy is secure. He was a great president who loved this country. He didn't poison the wells like latter day democrat presidents. There was nothing hateful about the man.

Ah, Col. Candyass pops up....figures you'd be a big FDR supporter. He built all that with TAX DOLLARS which doesn't make him anything other than a typical Rat.....Spends other people's money, wants credit for other people's work, blames his failures on his opponents. WW2 ended the Depression....nothing FDR did worked because he denied the fundamental concept of FREE ENTERPRISE although his family was uber-rich from it. Johnson's "great society" was the second kick in the head we took from you leftist turds....Obozo-Care is the third....today $18T in debt and things are worse.

 

[Tom Sweetnam]

Get out and travel a bit all you FDR detractors. His public works projects built thousands of beautiful post offices, court houses, and thousands of beautiful campgrounds for which I will ever be grateful. He put millions of people to work, including painters, writers, and poets. And look at the quality of what all those people produced. For his day, FDR probably pumped more American dollars back into America than any other president. His legacy is secure. He was a great president who loved this country. He didn't poison the wells like latter day democrat presidents. There was nothing hateful about the man.

Ah, Col. Candyass pops up....figures you'd be a big FDR supporter. He built all that with TAX DOLLARS which doesn't make him anything other than a typical Rat.....wants credit for other people's work, blames his failures on his opponents. WW2 ended the Depression....nothing FDR did worked because he denied the fundamental concept of FREE ENTERPRISE although his family was uber-rich from it. Johnson's "great society" was the second kick in the head we took from you leftist turds....today $18T in debt and things are worse.

Our lying poser chickenshit shows his yellow head. Where's that Recondo School verification, you poser sack of shit?

 

[BullKurtz]

Get out and travel a bit all you FDR detractors. His public works projects built thousands of beautiful post offices, court houses, and thousands of beautiful campgrounds for which I will ever be grateful. He put millions of people to work, including painters, writers, and poets. And look at the quality of what all those people produced. For his day, FDR probably pumped more American dollars back into America than any other president. His legacy is secure. He was a great president who loved this country. He didn't poison the wells like latter day democrat presidents. There was nothing hateful about the man.

Ah, Col. Candyass pops up....figures you'd be a big FDR supporter. He built all that with TAX DOLLARS which doesn't make him anything other than a typical Rat.....wants credit for other people's work, blames his failures on his opponents. WW2 ended the Depression....nothing FDR did worked because he denied the fundamental concept of FREE ENTERPRISE although his family was uber-rich from it. Johnson's "great society" was the second kick in the head we took from you leftist turds....today $18T in debt and things are worse.

Our lying poser chickenshit shows his yellow head. Where's that Recondo School verification, you poser sack of shit?

What's your social security number, numb nuts?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Get out and travel a bit all you FDR detractors. His public works projects built thousands of beautiful post offices, court houses, and thousands of beautiful campgrounds for which I will ever be grateful. He put millions of people to work, including painters, writers, and poets. And look at the quality of what all those people produced. For his day, FDR probably pumped more American dollars back into America than any other president. His legacy is secure. He was a great president who loved this country. He didn't poison the wells like latter day democrat presidents. There was nothing hateful about the man.

Ah, Col. Candyass pops up....figures you'd be a big FDR supporter. He built all that with TAX DOLLARS which doesn't make him anything other than a typical Rat.....wants credit for other people's work, blames his failures on his opponents. WW2 ended the Depression....nothing FDR did worked because he denied the fundamental concept of FREE ENTERPRISE although his family was uber-rich from it. Johnson's "great society" was the second kick in the head we took from you leftist turds....today $18T in debt and things are worse.

Our lying poser chickenshit shows his yellow head. Where's that Recondo School verification, you poser sack of shit?

"FDR probably pumped more American dollars back into America than any other president."

Consider the argument that building the bridge will provide x number of jobs.....the unspoken belief is that those jobs would not otherwise come into existence. But...where did the money to pay for those jobs come from? Answer: every dollar given to those bridge workers was taken from other workers in taxes. So...if the bridge cost $50 million, then $50 million (at least) had to be taken from the economy, from taxpayers.
a. And what would have happened to the $50 million had it not been taken? Right....it would have remained in the economy producing jobs.
Henry Hazlitt

 

[Discombobulated]

They were soul-mates.

1. He gave official recognition to Stalin in 1933
2. He provided lend lease largesse to Stalin far and above what was necessary
3. He allowed and encouraged Stalin's spies in his administration.
4. He insisted on a communist as his second vice president
5. He sent uranium and plans for the atomic bomb to Stalin
6. All of this with the foreknowledge that Stalin was a homicidal psychopath.
7. He acquiesced to d-day, not where his generals suggested, but where Stalin insisted.



What is your explanation for the above?

And...if your did your own research, and verified same....would you have had the courage to ask your history teachers/professors to explain their support of FDR in the face of these facts?

Would you?

Numbers two through seven are absolute bull shit, completely unsupported by any legitimate historians.

Wait...."completely unsupported by any legitimate historians"....you're pretending you have knowledge of history, much less "legitimate historians"?????


Your ignorance is hidden about as well as a bikini hides 45 pounds of ugly fat~


Now jot this down: never......never.....doubt what I post.
It is completely accurate, your biases notwithstanding.

Your outstanding characteristics, lying imbecile, are so obvious, that this post should come under the heading of 'beating a dead horse.'....

But I can't resist....my guilty pleasure.

Let's take the item that you claim....I eschew vulgar language, so I can't quote you, but with which you disagree vehemently....the one that should have ended any association Roosevelt considered with Stalin:

"6. All of this with the foreknowledge that Stalin was a homicidal psychopath."




Now...watch me make mincemeat out of you:

1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. On November 16, 1933, President Roosevelt rushed to embrace, endorse Stalin....and recognize the USSR.

If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational:
"Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his "Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath"by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.


2. Bear in mind, eight months earlier, journalist Gareth Jones had exposed Stalin's Terror Famine:
"In the train a Communist denied to me that there was a famine. I flung a crust of bread which I had been eating from my own supply into a spittoon. A peasant fellow-passenger fished it out and ravenously ate it." Gareth Jones journalist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

a. Malcolm Muggeridge "was the first writer to reveal the true nature of Stalin s regime when in 1933 he exposed the terror famine in the Ukraine. " Time and Eternity The Uncollected Writings of Malcolm Muggeridge Malcolm Muggeridge Nicholas Flynn 9781570759055 Amazon.com Books

b. So FDR knew of the Terror Famine...yet he enveloped Joe Stalin in " the cloak of his popularity..."
Time Magazine, December 17, 1934.


3. Check the timeline. FDR didn't embrace the USSR out of a need in a fight against Hitler....in fact, at that time, FDR had a rosy relationship with Germany. So....why overlook the genocide?

a. May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’



Did I just eat your lunch, or what????




Never doubt me again.


Never.

I still waiting for the part where you take all your superficial out of context characterizations and use them to explain how FDRs policies extended the Second World War.

I believe post #133 made clear to all what an ignorant slime bucket you are.

Right now you’re probably trying to brush something off your face…you didn’t realize it was the floor.

Post #133 looks exactly like another mindless scree of completely unrelated, out of context statements from more books you never read.

 

[BullKurtz]

It should also be mentioned that Teddy was a psychopath....(not that there's anything wrong with that). It's pretty clear that the Spanish didn't blow up the Maine, Teddy's excuse to smoke the Spanish fleet and invade Cuba. He wasn't a coward like his nephew because he wasn't a communist. I learned things about him I didn't know and for him I have r-e-s-p-e-c-t. He proved himself out on the prairie and then went home and proved himself to America. He's the one on Rushmore, not the crippled liar with the cigarette holder.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Numbers two through seven are absolute bull shit, completely unsupported by any legitimate historians.

Wait...."completely unsupported by any legitimate historians"....you're pretending you have knowledge of history, much less "legitimate historians"?????


Your ignorance is hidden about as well as a bikini hides 45 pounds of ugly fat~


Now jot this down: never......never.....doubt what I post.
It is completely accurate, your biases notwithstanding.

Your outstanding characteristics, lying imbecile, are so obvious, that this post should come under the heading of 'beating a dead horse.'....

But I can't resist....my guilty pleasure.

Let's take the item that you claim....I eschew vulgar language, so I can't quote you, but with which you disagree vehemently....the one that should have ended any association Roosevelt considered with Stalin:

"6. All of this with the foreknowledge that Stalin was a homicidal psychopath."




Now...watch me make mincemeat out of you:

1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. On November 16, 1933, President Roosevelt rushed to embrace, endorse Stalin....and recognize the USSR.

If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational:
"Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his "Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath"by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.


2. Bear in mind, eight months earlier, journalist Gareth Jones had exposed Stalin's Terror Famine:
"In the train a Communist denied to me that there was a famine. I flung a crust of bread which I had been eating from my own supply into a spittoon. A peasant fellow-passenger fished it out and ravenously ate it." Gareth Jones journalist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

a. Malcolm Muggeridge "was the first writer to reveal the true nature of Stalin s regime when in 1933 he exposed the terror famine in the Ukraine. " Time and Eternity The Uncollected Writings of Malcolm Muggeridge Malcolm Muggeridge Nicholas Flynn 9781570759055 Amazon.com Books

b. So FDR knew of the Terror Famine...yet he enveloped Joe Stalin in " the cloak of his popularity..."
Time Magazine, December 17, 1934.


3. Check the timeline. FDR didn't embrace the USSR out of a need in a fight against Hitler....in fact, at that time, FDR had a rosy relationship with Germany. So....why overlook the genocide?

a. May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’



Did I just eat your lunch, or what????




Never doubt me again.


Never.

I still waiting for the part where you take all your superficial out of context characterizations and use them to explain how FDRs policies extended the Second World War.

I believe post #133 made clear to all what an ignorant slime bucket you are.

Right now you’re probably trying to brush something off your face…you didn’t realize it was the floor.

Post #133 looks exactly like another mindless scree of completely unrelated, out of context statements from more books you never read.

You seem to be bereft of either a cogent argument or a cerebrum.....and, of course, honesty.

 

[Discombobulated]

Wait...."completely unsupported by any legitimate historians"....you're pretending you have knowledge of history, much less "legitimate historians"?????


Your ignorance is hidden about as well as a bikini hides 45 pounds of ugly fat~


Now jot this down: never......never.....doubt what I post.
It is completely accurate, your biases notwithstanding.

Your outstanding characteristics, lying imbecile, are so obvious, that this post should come under the heading of 'beating a dead horse.'....

But I can't resist....my guilty pleasure.

Let's take the item that you claim....I eschew vulgar language, so I can't quote you, but with which you disagree vehemently....the one that should have ended any association Roosevelt considered with Stalin:

"6. All of this with the foreknowledge that Stalin was a homicidal psychopath."




Now...watch me make mincemeat out of you:

1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. On November 16, 1933, President Roosevelt rushed to embrace, endorse Stalin....and recognize the USSR.

If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational:
"Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his "Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath"by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.


2. Bear in mind, eight months earlier, journalist Gareth Jones had exposed Stalin's Terror Famine:
"In the train a Communist denied to me that there was a famine. I flung a crust of bread which I had been eating from my own supply into a spittoon. A peasant fellow-passenger fished it out and ravenously ate it." Gareth Jones journalist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

a. Malcolm Muggeridge "was the first writer to reveal the true nature of Stalin s regime when in 1933 he exposed the terror famine in the Ukraine. " Time and Eternity The Uncollected Writings of Malcolm Muggeridge Malcolm Muggeridge Nicholas Flynn 9781570759055 Amazon.com Books

b. So FDR knew of the Terror Famine...yet he enveloped Joe Stalin in " the cloak of his popularity..."
Time Magazine, December 17, 1934.


3. Check the timeline. FDR didn't embrace the USSR out of a need in a fight against Hitler....in fact, at that time, FDR had a rosy relationship with Germany. So....why overlook the genocide?

a. May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’



Did I just eat your lunch, or what????




Never doubt me again.


Never.

I still waiting for the part where you take all your superficial out of context characterizations and use them to explain how FDRs policies extended the Second World War.

I believe post #133 made clear to all what an ignorant slime bucket you are.

Right now you’re probably trying to brush something off your face…you didn’t realize it was the floor.

Post #133 looks exactly like another mindless scree of completely unrelated, out of context statements from more books you never read.

You seem to be bereft of either a cogent argument or a cerebrum.....and, of course, honesty.

Your shallow, politically oriented, web based, pop culture revisionist history could never produce anything like a cogent argument.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Your outstanding characteristics, lying imbecile, are so obvious, that this post should come under the heading of 'beating a dead horse.'....

But I can't resist....my guilty pleasure.

Let's take the item that you claim....I eschew vulgar language, so I can't quote you, but with which you disagree vehemently....the one that should have ended any association Roosevelt considered with Stalin:

"6. All of this with the foreknowledge that Stalin was a homicidal psychopath."




Now...watch me make mincemeat out of you:

1. FDR came into office March 4th of 1933. On November 16, 1933, President Roosevelt rushed to embrace, endorse Stalin....and recognize the USSR.

If this act, based on FDR's additional pro-Soviet endeavors, was rational....then these folks must have been irrational:
"Four Presidents and their six Secretaries of State for over a decade and a half held to this resolve," i.e., refusal to recognize the Soviet government. That was written by Herbert Hoover, one of those four Presidents. He wrote it in his "Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath"by George H. Nash, published posthumously, obviously, in 2011, pg 24-29.


2. Bear in mind, eight months earlier, journalist Gareth Jones had exposed Stalin's Terror Famine:
"In the train a Communist denied to me that there was a famine. I flung a crust of bread which I had been eating from my own supply into a spittoon. A peasant fellow-passenger fished it out and ravenously ate it." Gareth Jones journalist - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

a. Malcolm Muggeridge "was the first writer to reveal the true nature of Stalin s regime when in 1933 he exposed the terror famine in the Ukraine. " Time and Eternity The Uncollected Writings of Malcolm Muggeridge Malcolm Muggeridge Nicholas Flynn 9781570759055 Amazon.com Books

b. So FDR knew of the Terror Famine...yet he enveloped Joe Stalin in " the cloak of his popularity..."
Time Magazine, December 17, 1934.


3. Check the timeline. FDR didn't embrace the USSR out of a need in a fight against Hitler....in fact, at that time, FDR had a rosy relationship with Germany. So....why overlook the genocide?

a. May 11, 1933, the Nazi newspaper Volkischer Beobachter, (People’s Observer): January 17, 1934, “We, too, as German National Socialists are looking toward America…” and “Roosevelt’s adoption of National Socialist strains of thought in his economic and social policies” comparable to Hitler’s own dictatorial ‘Fuhrerprinzip.’



Did I just eat your lunch, or what????




Never doubt me again.


Never.

I still waiting for the part where you take all your superficial out of context characterizations and use them to explain how FDRs policies extended the Second World War.

I believe post #133 made clear to all what an ignorant slime bucket you are.

Right now you’re probably trying to brush something off your face…you didn’t realize it was the floor.

Post #133 looks exactly like another mindless scree of completely unrelated, out of context statements from more books you never read.

You seem to be bereft of either a cogent argument or a cerebrum.....and, of course, honesty.

Your shallow, politically oriented, web based, pop culture revisionist history could never produce anything like a cogent argument.

Let's see you try to answer post #133.....ripped you a new one, huh?


It’s too bad stupidity isn’t painful.

 

[Camp]

Get out and travel a bit all you FDR detractors. His public works projects built thousands of beautiful post offices, court houses, and thousands of beautiful campgrounds for which I will ever be grateful. He put millions of people to work, including painters, writers, and poets. And look at the quality of what all those people produced. For his day, FDR probably pumped more American dollars back into America than any other president. His legacy is secure. He was a great president who loved this country. He didn't poison the wells like latter day democrat presidents. There was nothing hateful about the man.

Ah, Col. Candyass pops up....figures you'd be a big FDR supporter. He built all that with TAX DOLLARS which doesn't make him anything other than a typical Rat.....wants credit for other people's work, blames his failures on his opponents. WW2 ended the Depression....nothing FDR did worked because he denied the fundamental concept of FREE ENTERPRISE although his family was uber-rich from it. Johnson's "great society" was the second kick in the head we took from you leftist turds....today $18T in debt and things are worse.

Our lying poser chickenshit shows his yellow head. Where's that Recondo School verification, you poser sack of shit?

"FDR probably pumped more American dollars back into America than any other president."

Consider the argument that building the bridge will provide x number of jobs.....the unspoken belief is that those jobs would not otherwise come into existence. But...where did the money to pay for those jobs come from? Answer: every dollar given to those bridge workers was taken from other workers in taxes. So...if the bridge cost $50 million, then $50 million (at least) had to be taken from the economy, from taxpayers.
a. And what would have happened to the $50 million had it not been taken? Right....it would have remained in the economy producing jobs.
Henry Hazlitt

Well there is a great example of the difference between shortsightedness and long range vision, policies that benefit a small few and policies that benefit the masses for generations. We are still driving over the bridges in passenger cars and trucks that profit commercially. As a bonus we are still collecting revenues from them 75 years after they were built.

 

[BullKurtz]

Get out and travel a bit all you FDR detractors. His public works projects built thousands of beautiful post offices, court houses, and thousands of beautiful campgrounds for which I will ever be grateful. He put millions of people to work, including painters, writers, and poets. And look at the quality of what all those people produced. For his day, FDR probably pumped more American dollars back into America than any other president. His legacy is secure. He was a great president who loved this country. He didn't poison the wells like latter day democrat presidents. There was nothing hateful about the man.

Ah, Col. Candyass pops up....figures you'd be a big FDR supporter. He built all that with TAX DOLLARS which doesn't make him anything other than a typical Rat.....wants credit for other people's work, blames his failures on his opponents. WW2 ended the Depression....nothing FDR did worked because he denied the fundamental concept of FREE ENTERPRISE although his family was uber-rich from it. Johnson's "great society" was the second kick in the head we took from you leftist turds....today $18T in debt and things are worse.

Our lying poser chickenshit shows his yellow head. Where's that Recondo School verification, you poser sack of shit?

"FDR probably pumped more American dollars back into America than any other president."

Consider the argument that building the bridge will provide x number of jobs.....the unspoken belief is that those jobs would not otherwise come into existence. But...where did the money to pay for those jobs come from? Answer: every dollar given to those bridge workers was taken from other workers in taxes. So...if the bridge cost $50 million, then $50 million (at least) had to be taken from the economy, from taxpayers.
a. And what would have happened to the $50 million had it not been taken? Right....it would have remained in the economy producing jobs.
Henry Hazlitt

Well there is a great example of the difference between shortsightedness and long range vision, policies that benefit a small few and policies that benefit the masses for generations. We are still driving over the bridges in passenger cars and trucks that profit commercially. As a bonus we are still collecting revenues from them 75 years after they were built.

I believe most of that was built by Eisenhower not FDR.

 

[Discombobulated]

I still waiting for the part where you take all your superficial out of context characterizations and use them to explain how FDRs policies extended the Second World War.

I believe post #133 made clear to all what an ignorant slime bucket you are.

Right now you’re probably trying to brush something off your face…you didn’t realize it was the floor.

Post #133 looks exactly like another mindless scree of completely unrelated, out of context statements from more books you never read.

You seem to be bereft of either a cogent argument or a cerebrum.....and, of course, honesty.

Your shallow, politically oriented, web based, pop culture revisionist history could never produce anything like a cogent argument.

Let's see you try to answer post #133.....ripped you a new one, huh?


It’s too bad stupidity isn’t painful.

You have yet to establish your hair brained theory about how FDRs policies prolonged the Second World War. I've already dispensed with post #133 as superficial nonsense.