Do you think you could make a valuable contribution to this thread?
After all it’s your OP.
Maybe answer the question regarding what makes you believe allegations carry more weight than evidence, and how you would defend yourself against an allegation of - let’s say rape - allegedly you raped this woman almost 40 years ago and there is no date or location provided - so you can’t provide an alibi - and there are no corroborating witnesses?
TIA
I would refer you to post #46; Thanks
Why? It’s a perfectly reasonable question. You are alleging Kav has perjured himself and is/was a drunk based on the unsubstantiated comment of a woman, you also believe he sexually assaulted a woman based on testimony completely lacking in evidence, details and corroboration. So, I ask again, why do you believe allegations without evidence? And how would you prove yourself innocent of them?
thread is NOT about me; next
I see you also find it ‘funny’ that I ask you how you know that your assertion that this woman has no reason to lie, is true.
Another claim you can’t back up, huh?
I will spot you this one;
Kavanaugh IMO has a reason to lie; if he can successfully lie his way through all of the hoops then ehe stands a chance at being a SCOTUS justice.
On the other hand: WHY would Dr. Swisher lie; what incentive would there be for her to lie?
Also, Lynne Brookes; WHY would she lie about the same thing?
Both Swisher & Brookes have nearly identical statements, and voice nearly identical reasons they claim for coming forward.
WHY would they both lie?
I don't see either one as having any real skin in the game but then maybe you could explain WHY?