Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I doubt anyone counts up the number of people whose name is marked off in the register as "voted."Easy Peasy
When people go to vote or a mail in ballot is received their name is marked in the register as……VOTED
At the end of the election, all votes cast are tabulated.
If they don’t match……You got some Splain’n to do!
I doubt anyone counts up the number of people whose name is marked off in the register as "voted."
So with all those votes slipped into the stream, what did Arizonal do about it?They do it every election and check against vote tallies
It is their job
So with all those votes slipped into the stream, what did Arizonal do about it?
Nothing, so it doesn't matter that they are checking, it's just a waste of time and money.
You are discussing something with a alien from another reality.They weren’t slipped in
They were legal votes
No Fraud
Sorry, "inserts" was the word Katie Hobbs' lawyer used, not "slip in." Did you not see the video? Katie Hobbs' own lawyer said:They weren’t slipped in
They were legal votes
No Fraud
All that means is someone else handles the ballot.Sorry, "inserts" was the word Katie Hobbs' lawyer used, not "slip in." Did you not see the video? Katie Hobbs' own lawyer said:
Lawyer for Katie Hobbs: Are you aware than under Arizona law, a ballot is not actually unlawful, if it is, uh, the term that's used sometimes is harvested or ballot collection, . if somebody brings it, and inserts it into the stream, but not into a designated authorized drop box, are you aware that under Arizonal law, that is not actually an unlawful ballot.
Witness: I think the term in the law is an "invalid ballot."
So, there is is. The Democratic lawyer for the Democratic Secretary of state who oversaw her own election for governor states that just even if a ballot is inserted into the stream by someone not authorized to handle it, that vote should count. The judge apparently agreed.
So, there it is. Rebublicans would be stupid not do also insert ballots into the stream, even if they are not authorized to handle the ballots.
Suppose that causes there to be twice as many votes in the stream as voters who cast votes. So what? How you gonna know which votes were invalid? Even if you could know that, the judge would have to say that they still count.
Repubs: These are the new rules, we have to work with them. Don't get stuck on what is right, your opponents certainly are not.
Democracy and rule of law are like my grandmother. I love her and her Alabama cooking. But she's dead now, so it would be foolish for me to go to her house at thanksgiving every year expecting to get some of her fried chicken and catfish.
but if somebody that is not authorized to handle it, deposits it, or . . . like what happened at Runbeck . .
As long as we all play by the new rules, I'm fine with that.All that means is someone else handles the ballot.
Ask a friend to drop it off and it is unauthorized.
It is still a valid ballot
Kari Lake wasn't given the leeway to prove her case because the judge barely allowed her the right to inspect ballots. She wasn't allowed much else. It was all a lost cause once the bought and paid for judge decided what could be presented as evidence.
Yeah.....these judges always tell everyone when they take a bribe. LOL!!!!!Do you have proof that the Judge was bought and paid for or is it just an opinion. She can still appeal.
What a condescenting clown, who got owned by Lake's non-lawyer witness.
Democrats have no shame in defending invalid ballots as a way to get Democrats elected.
Of course the case was destined to lose. Not because the judge was partisan, I know nothing about the judge. But becuase the courts have shown great reluctance to rule that an election was invalid, no matter how invalid the voting and vote counting process may have been.
If we are going to stop the Democrooks from cheating, we will have to secure elections before they take place. Lawsuits after the fact will never go anywhere.
Naw.....we expected them to get away with it......the defendants get to pick the judge....so what do you expect!!Aww, someone's mad yet another election lie lawsuit got laughed out of court.
Such sad and weaselly self delusion.Naw.....we expected them to get away with it......the defendants get to pick the judge....so what do you expect!!
Yes you are. They only allowed her to look at less than 200 ballots.Such sad and weaselly self delusion.
She had no evidence. So she got laughed out of court. The end. This crybabying won't help.Yes you are. They only allowed her to look at less than 200 ballots.
She wanted to look at 135,000 but wasn't allowed to.
The decision was predetermined.
They didn't care if she had evidence. She had to prove that all of the screwups were intentional, you fucking idiot!!!She had no evidence. So she got laughed out of court. The end. This crybabying won't help.
To be fair, I heard no mention of laughing at her. These election deniers aint that funny anymore. Just boring. All the votes were counted so even if she proved the irregularities were intentional, some one was prosecuted and thrown in jail for changing printer settings, the election results would not change. Two realities.She had no evidence. So she got laughed out of court. The end. This crybabying won't help.
Yeah and I will take that you there is no proof of a brideYeah.....these judges always tell everyone when they take a bribe. LOL!!!!!
In the alternate reality with alternate facts, they just know stuff.Yeah and I will take that you there is no proof of a bride
No bride involved.Yeah and I will take that you there is no proof of a bride
