Kari Lake Files 70 Page Lawsuit in AZ- HUNDREDS of Thousands of Illegal Ballots, 59% of ED Precinct Machine Failures, Illicit Mail-In Ballots

And like all these lawsuits she comes up empty.


Wednesday was Kari Lake’s big day, her chance to at long last prove that the election was rigged and she was robbed of her right to be Arizona’s next governor.

This was her moment.

Yet Lake and her attorneys offered no smoking gun. Not even a lightly used pea shooter.

Instead, the day was filled with testimony about “pandemonium” at the polls, questionable handling of early ballots and even a conspiracy theory that ballot images were printed an inch too small and thus they couldn’t be counted.

A theory that was blown to bits in just minutes, by the way.


No smoking gun in Kari Lake's lawsuit (not even a pea shooter)
 
This is a well written lawsuit citing evidence that will be presented. Statutes we're violated in Arizona. Hobbs days are numbered.

Read the lawsuit here.

Kari Lake Files 70 Page Lawsuit to Throw Out Fraudulent Arizona Midterm Election Results – Claims HUNDREDS of Thousands of Illegal Ballots, 59% of ED Precinct Machine Failures, Tens of Thousands of Illicit Mail-in Ballots – FILING INCLUDED​



Well written, huh?

Then why were 8 of the 10 claims tossed out on their ass? And the remaining 2 held to standards of evidence under Arizona law that Kari Lake won't possibly be able to meet, as no such evidence exists?

When your lawsuit ignores the standards of the law in its allegations, its not well written.
 
This is a well written lawsuit citing evidence that will be presented. Statutes we're violated in Arizona. Hobbs days are numbered.

Read the lawsuit here.

Kari Lake Files 70 Page Lawsuit to Throw Out Fraudulent Arizona Midterm Election Results – Claims HUNDREDS of Thousands of Illegal Ballots, 59% of ED Precinct Machine Failures, Tens of Thousands of Illicit Mail-in Ballots – FILING INCLUDED​



Not going well for Lake so far. 8 of her 10 claims were already dismissed and 1 that was allowed to proceed is crashing and burning. Her claim that thousands were disenfranchised because tabulators rejected ballots...

Parikh, permitted by the court to examine some of the ballots, said he found a number of the sample were printed out to just 19 inches, leaving excess area along the borders. In a Twitter post, Lake said that was 48 of 113 examined ballots.
That is significant, Parikh said, because there would be no way for the tabulators, either at vote centers or at the Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center, to read and tally them.
“Is there any way, in your opinion, for a 19-inch ballot image to be projected onto a 20-inch ballot by accident?’’ asked Lake attorney Kurt Olson.
“No, sir,’’ Parikh responded. “The settings and the configurations and the procedures that are used cannot allow that,’’ he continued. “These are not a bump up against the printer and the settings change.’’
Liddy, however, said the printer could have been placed in a “shrink to fit’’ mode.
More to the point, he suggested there is a flaw in Parikh’s contention that votes were not counted.
If a 19-inch printed ballot would not be read by tabulators, as with all unreadable ballots, just like any others with things like stray marks or tears, would be manually duplicated by election workers into a new ballot that could be scanned. Parikh confirmed he had seen only the original ballots, not the duplicates.
“Whether it’s accidental or inadvertent, if the shrink-to-fit 19-inch ballot has to be duplicated, once it’s duplicated, would it be tabulated?’’ Liddy asked.
“I’m unable to answer your question,’’ Parikh responded.

[emphasis mine]
 
Not going well for Lake so far. 8 of her 10 claims were already dismissed and 1 that was allowed to proceed is crashing and burning. Her claim that thousands were disenfranchised because tabulators rejected ballots...

Parikh, permitted by the court to examine some of the ballots, said he found a number of the sample were printed out to just 19 inches, leaving excess area along the borders. In a Twitter post, Lake said that was 48 of 113 examined ballots.
That is significant, Parikh said, because there would be no way for the tabulators, either at vote centers or at the Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center, to read and tally them.
“Is there any way, in your opinion, for a 19-inch ballot image to be projected onto a 20-inch ballot by accident?’’ asked Lake attorney Kurt Olson.
“No, sir,’’ Parikh responded. “The settings and the configurations and the procedures that are used cannot allow that,’’ he continued. “These are not a bump up against the printer and the settings change.’’
Liddy, however, said the printer could have been placed in a “shrink to fit’’ mode.
More to the point, he suggested there is a flaw in Parikh’s contention that votes were not counted.
If a 19-inch printed ballot would not be read by tabulators, as with all unreadable ballots, just like any others with things like stray marks or tears, would be manually duplicated by election workers into a new ballot that could be scanned. Parikh confirmed he had seen only the original ballots, not the duplicates.
“Whether it’s accidental or inadvertent, if the shrink-to-fit 19-inch ballot has to be duplicated, once it’s duplicated, would it be tabulated?’’ Liddy asked.
“I’m unable to answer your question,’’ Parikh responded.

[emphasis mine]

Which might explain why Kari Lake has been unable to produce even ONE disenfranchise voter.

And she needs -bare minimum- 17,000 of them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top