Kari Lake Accused of Breaking Law by Proving Democrats Broke Law, and Having Gall to Legally Show Fraud Ballots with Bad Signature Matches

[toobfreak]

Why do you have to sign ballots ?

^^^ Stupid idiot question of the week.

 

[toobfreak]

We hand in our voting card

We? You? How does the election board know WHO you are without some proof of identity?

 

[munkle]

The law protects people from having their signatures publicized for people to copy.

This is common sense.

You can take it to court without violating the law. Twitter changed nothing.

This isn’t hypocrisy. This is a bunch of morons who lack common sense.

LOL making shit up. Post the law. Waiting.

 

[Marener]

LOL making shit up. Post the law. Waiting.

Read the letter citing the law. It makes sense. You surely don’t want people publishing and passing around signatures that could be used to copy.

 

[Lastamender]

Read the letter citing the law. It makes sense. You surely don’t want people publishing and passing around signatures that could be used to copy.

Pretty weak excuse. Signatures are easy to come by. Talk about the ones that clearly do not match. Enough to make the results of the election uncertain. That is really all Lake has to prove.

 

[Marener]

Pretty weak excuse. Signatures are easy to come by. Talk about the ones that clearly do not match. Enough to make the results of the election uncertain. That is really all Lake has to prove.

Pretty funny how you guys freak out if you think the letter of the law isn’t being followed but don’t feel you have to follow the law yourselves.

 

[lantern2814]

Pretty funny how you guys freak out if you think the letter of the law isn’t being followed but don’t feel you have to follow the law yourselves.

Well moron, as you’ve been told multiple times yet keep ignoring, since the signatures aren’t legitimate anyway, the law doesn’t apply here. Funny how you just keep returning for more kicks in the nether regions.

 

[Marener]

Well moron, as you’ve been told multiple times yet keep ignoring, since the signatures aren’t legitimate anyway, the law doesn’t apply here. Funny how you just keep returning for more kicks in the nether regions.

How did you determine the signatures aren’t legitimate?

 

[martybegan]

Kari Lake can take it to court. Or at least she could it this had anything to do with her election (it doesn’t, although you won’t see her admit that).

I’ve always demanded the rigor of judicial proceedings.

You guys think a tweet is “proof”. That explains a lot of how you keep looking like morons. You can say whatever you want on social media.

fuh fuh fuh, court, fuh fuh fuh.

The courts won't touch this because they know the shitstorm it would create.

 

[Jarlaxle]

How did you determine the signatures aren’t legitimate?

He has functioning eyes and brain.

 

[Marener]

The courts won't touch this because they know the shitstorm it would create.

This is just another pathetic excuse you've made for yourself.

Turns out that you actually have to have a compelling factual complete case for it to go anywhere in court. You never do, so the courts dismiss it. It has nothing to do with any shitstorm. It's has everything to do with the fact that your arguments are bullshit.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

The Communist Manifesto, if I'm not mistaken. Democracy, honest elections, fairness all have nothing to do with anything. Only winning and power. Note how Biden keeps saying "election denialism" is a threat to democracy itself. As if asking questions and debate are "denialism." Communism cannot tolerate debate, because it is a rotten system that loses on the merits. You must silence debate by silencing opposition. By sending them to unvaxxed camps or whatever. Which is what they have planned.

Now they want to throw Kari Lake in jail, to silence her. Exactly how communists think.

 

[scruffy]

Publishing the signature of people makes it easier to forge their signature.

Kari Lake is violating a law that protects the security of elections.

Bullshit.

 

[scruffy]

It’s definitely evidence that Kari Lake is violating campaign laws by publishing the signatures of voters.

I never said it wasn’t evidence. It sure as hell isn’t proof of anything.

It's proof of FRAUD, you fucking idiot.

 

[martybegan]

This is just another pathetic excuse you've made for yourself.

Turns out that you actually have to have a compelling factual complete case for it to go anywhere in court. You never do, so the courts dismiss it. It has nothing to do with any shitstorm. It's has everything to do with the fact that your arguments are bullshit.

It's a fact, visible to anyone not a SJW cuck.

So people had compelling evidence when they argued for Plessey?

 

[Marener]

It's a fact, visible to anyone not a SJW cuck.

So people had compelling evidence when they argued for Plessey?

It’s not a fact. People sign their signature in different ways over different periods of time.

Did anyone reach out to any of these voters to ask their opinion on it?

No?

Then get the fuck off social media acting like a asshole and do it.

 

[martybegan]

It’s not a fact. People sign their signature in different ways over different periods of time.

Did anyone reach out to any of these voters to ask their opinion on it?

No?

Then get the fuck off social media acting like a asshole and do it.

The second someone does, you twats will accuse whoever doing it of harassment.

 

[Marener]

The second someone does, you twats will accuse whoever doing it of harassment.

Harassment comes second nature to thugs like you, so I recommend you find someone who is a better person than you to do so.

You could also do so IN COURT.

 

[martybegan]

Harassment comes second nature to thugs like you, so I recommend you find someone who is a better person than you to do so.

You could also do so IN COURT.

The courts are part of the system, and in some States are in lockstep with the people wanting to brush all this shit under the rug.

Courts are not infallible, or should Plessy still be law right now?

 

[Marener]

The courts are part of the system, and in some States are in lockstep with the people wanting to brush all this shit under the rug.

Courts are not infallible, or should Plessy still be law right now?

It takes a particular type of loser to trust shit on social media more than the courts.

You’re just full of excuses to justify your beliefs without being burdened by the work it takes to actually prove them.

You’re nothing but character flaws. Let’s just add lazy to the top of it.