rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 308,294
- 263,119
- 3,615
- Thread starter
- #81
75 percent of Americans say we don’t need GreenlandNever said we did.
80 percent of Greenland does not want to belong to the US
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
75 percent of Americans say we don’t need GreenlandNever said we did.
75 percent of Americans say we don’t need Greenland
80 percent of Greenland does not want to belong to the US
The voters in the Democratic primaries have had no choice in their candidate since 2004 when they picked John Kerry-Heinz.
2008 super delegates were used to push out Hillary for Obama, 2012 Obama ran unopposed, 2016 the DNC gave it to Hillary out of pity for when they kept her out in 2008, then 2020 they all pretty much dropped out so Biden could run, then in 2024 they installed Harris to run without one primary vote. Democrats are adverse to democracy.
Never said otherwise, you okay? Seems like you are having a Joe Biden moment.75 percent of Americans say we don’t need Greenland
80 percent of Greenland does not want to belong to the US
Link?
If Kamala Harris wanted Greenland to stage US Bases and obtain mineral rights she would have sent envoys to negotiate with Denmark and Greenland and obtain permission to build U.S. bases there and deploy troops.
She would have negotiated mineral rights and come up with a deal that is ideal for all parties.
The deal would have been signed and been a minor news story that is quickly forgotten.
You would know about doing that better than I doOr blown someone
All that matters is what Joint Chiefs Chair General Dan Caine tells Trump75 percent of Americans say we don’t need Greenland
80 percent of Greenland does not want to belong to the US
I just want to make sure we are all talking about the same country. Cuz during his speech in Davos, Dotard referred to Iceland not once but four times. When he meant Greenland. If Biden had done that the Right would be apoplectic.If Kamala Harris wanted Greenland to stage US Bases and obtain mineral rights she would have sent envoys to negotiate with Denmark and Greenland and obtain permission to build U.S. bases there and deploy troops.
She would have negotiated mineral rights and come up with a deal that is ideal for all parties.
The deal would have been signed and been a minor news story that is quickly forgotten.
The U.S. has been wanting Greenland for decades, nobody could get it done. Trump will negotiate a good deal for US and Greenland.Not at all
Expanding US presence in Greenland is not a big deal
Trump turned it into an international crisis
Most people do no understand what is at stake in preserving peace in this ever changingThe U.S. has been wanting Greenland for decades, nobody could get it done. Trump will negotiate a good deal for US and Greenland.
Come on RW, anything Trump does you oppose with the rest of your TDS cult. No one takes you seriously.
Have you already shoved Don's unhinged threats of taking Greenland by force down the memory hole? Or his stated "psychological need" to possess it? Or his belief he no longer needs to prioritize peaceful actions in trying to acquire it because he didn't receive the Nobel peace prize? That memory hole must be close to full by now.The U.S. has been wanting Greenland for decades, nobody could get it done. Trump will negotiate a good deal for US and Greenland.
Come on RW, anything Trump does you oppose with the rest of your TDS cult. No one takes you seriously.
You would know about doing that better than I do
You mean NATO's defense system, don't you?Greenland is the keypoint for our long term
defense system
Bro, what?If Kamala Harris wanted Greenland to stage US Bases and obtain mineral rights she would have sent envoys to negotiate with Denmark and Greenland and obtain permission to build U.S. bases there and deploy troops.
She would have negotiated mineral rights and come up with a deal that is ideal for all parties.
The deal would have been signed and been a minor news story that is quickly forgotten.
Who's money?You mean NATO's defense system, don't you?
Not by force, dude/dudette. He stated as much today, and seems there is aHave you already shoved Don's unhinged threats of taking Greenland by force down the memory hole? Or his stated "psychological need" to possess it? Or his belief he no longer needs to prioritize peaceful actions in trying to acquire it because he didn't receive the Nobel peace prize? That memory hole must be close to full by now.