Kamala goes to the Met

You answered your own question

No, I pointed out the obvious.

Trump has no idea how government works. That's kind of obvious.

His first term was less of a disaster because he surrounded himself with people who knew what they were doing.

Now he's surrounded himself with clowns like Hegseth, Walz, Bobby-Brain-worm, and Moscow Tulsi.
 
What qualification does Trump have. He never held office in his life, he just lived on Daddy's money after cheating his relatives in a probate court.
Which qualifications does he not meet?
 
No, I pointed out the obvious.

Trump has no idea how government works. That's kind of obvious.

His first term was less of a disaster because he surrounded himself with people who knew what they were doing.

Now he's surrounded himself with clowns like Hegseth, Walz, Bobby-Brain-worm, and Moscow Tulsi.

The problem with you lights is you believe government works.
 
What qualification does Trump have. He never held office in his life, he just lived on Daddy's money after cheating his relatives in a probate court.
Your Kenyan qualified him…No Kenyan ******* shit up = no TV host with bad hair as POTUS
 
She got kicked to the curb last November

She should slink away
 
No, I pointed out the obvious.

Trump has no idea how government works. That's kind of obvious.

His first term was less of a disaster because he surrounded himself with people who knew what they were doing.

Now he's surrounded himself with clowns like Hegseth, Walz, Bobby-Brain-worm, and Moscow Tulsi.
You write shit like that and still expect people to believe you? That's called clueless.
 
The problem with you lights is you believe government works.

Did your mail get delivered today? Did the bridge you took to work collapse when you were crossing it?

Government works just fine even when complete morons like Trump are in charge. We wouldn't have a country if government employees were like his Trump organization employees with their multiple business failures and bankruptcies.
 
Ahead of a fundraiser for the Democratic National Committee, former Vice President Kamala Harris made a surprise appearance at the Met Gala in New York, along with husband Dougie Emhoff

Conor Friedersdorf, a staff writer at The Atlantic, mocked the Democratic Party's decision to tout Harris' attendance at a gala for "Manhattan elites."

"How do we win back enough of the populists and the working class to compete for power again?" he wrote on X.

Damn, Kamala must have had a few bucks left in her campaign coffers. A ticket to the Met Gala in 2023 was $50,000, in 2024 it was $75,000, no telling on ticket prices for 2025. But don't you worry, Democrats are looking out for your best interests.


MSN
Kamala goes to the mat? What did someone finally punch her in the face? Oh wait, met not mat.
 
Did your mail get delivered today? Did the bridge you took to work collapse when you were crossing it?

Government works just fine even when complete morons like Trump are in charge. We wouldn't have a country if government employees were like his Trump organization employees with their multiple business failures and bankruptcies.

You’re using USPS as an example of good government. Hilarious.
 
Uh huh. Why didn’t use the financial status of USPS vs UPS?

Because they aren't comparable. One is a public service, the other is a for-profit business.

Oh, to the point, the USPS would be profitable if they weren't required to fund their pension fund for 50 years by a rather silly Republican law.
 
15th post
Because they aren't comparable. One is a public service, the other is a for-profit business.

Oh, to the point, the USPS would be profitable if they weren't required to fund their pension fund for 50 years by a rather silly Republican law.
Nope. It’s an excellent comparison. The USPS would not be profitable. Republicans required them to fund the pensions so taxpayers wouldn’t be stuck with the tab like we are with your blue city leftist Hell holes.
 
Because they aren't comparable. One is a public service, the other is a for-profit business.

Oh, to the point, the USPS would be profitable if they weren't required to fund their pension fund for 50 years by a rather silly Republican law.
Damn son this has been brought up by fools for a long time and you still have no idea what the hell you are spouting. They were required to do what they contractually said they would do. Then when they realized exactly how much it was costing they tried to back out and those that were living off the pension they were promised were suddenly told to go pound sand.
Democrats keep yelling that Republicans are going to take away Social Security but had no problem with USPS suddenly pulling a promised pension out from under people
 
Damn son this has been brought up by fools for a long time and you still have no idea what the hell you are spouting. They were required to do what they contractually said they would do. Then when they realized exactly how much it was costing they tried to back out and those that were living off the pension they were promised were suddenly told to go pound sand.
Democrats keep yelling that Republicans are going to take away Social Security but had no problem with USPS suddenly pulling a promised pension out from under people

Oh, get real. No organization with a Pension fund is required to fund it at the level the USPS is.
 
Oh, get real. No organization with a Pension fund is required to fund it at the level the USPS is.
How many organizations that have pension funds have suddenly suddenly decided to pull that fund out from under everyone?
I realize you want to believe that your cult is better then the other cult but in reality they really aren’t
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom