Montrovant
Fuzzy bears!
It's part of the opening of the game. Fans who paid to see the game are in the stadium for said game ( a captive audience). To imply that it's not part of "the game" is dishonest semantics.Yeah. Exactly why this asshole is out of a job. The public doesn't like political statements during sports.
Once AGAIN it's not 'during sports" at all. There is nothing in a football (baseball, soccer etc etc) game that requires or even suggests anybody's national anthem, NOR is it done during any game, which begins at the kickoff (or first pitch etc). And when NFL does it it's not even part of the broadcast, nor should it be. Which means nobody even sees any of this unless they happen to be at the game and happen to be looking around for something to whine about. The vast majority watching on some electronic device didn't even know football players were out there for a national anthem, which has only been going on less than a decade anyway.
In other words these are robots playing the "I'm offended" game only because the System ordered them to do that, and it never occurred to them to say, "yeah? Why?".
And that is mind control.
No dear. It isn't. The game begins with the kickoff. PERIOD.
I played football (and baseball) all through my youth and not one had a frickin' national anthem in it. And guess what --- they all counted.
What's going on here is a jingoistic charade for zombies.
The baseball iteration is the most ironic, where a stadium full of zombies obediently go through the motions and then sit down to watch a field of players from Panama and Mexico and Cuba and Venezuela and Japan and Korea and Australia and Curaçao and Colombia and Taiwan and the DR and Canada, eh?
And your youth games were the same as the NFL?
Same game, yup. So were the other sports. Underlining the point that NOWHERE is it necessary to play any national anthem in order to play a game of football (baseball, basketball, etc). It is not part of the game. It's not in any way related. And I'm refuting those klowns here who want to pretend that it is.
Matter of fact you're about to agree that it's irrelevant later in this post. And you'll be right.
Why don't we have to wait through a national anthem when we go to a music concert? A movie? A play? The grocery store? It would be equally irrelevant and make the same amount of sense, i.e. Zero. But then again the concert halls and theaters and grocery stores haven't been pimped out by the Pentagon to put on charades, have they.
Look, outside of the issue of kneeling players, this idea that the players are only on the job from the start of play until the final whistle is ridiculous. I am confident that no NFL player has a contract stipulating that they are only employees during game time. When an NFL player is on the field wearing their team's uniform, they are doing so as employees of the NFL. Kaepernick was kneeling while at work.
Again, NFL players are contractors, not 'employees'. And of course the requirements of that contract require much more than the 60 minutes of play --- practice squads and workouts, suiting up, travel, etc. But nobody is contracted to be a marionette for a Pentagon-pimped fake-patriotism display. It's got (again) Zero to do with the game, with practicing for the game, with travelling to the game, or any other aspect of it.
The anthem may not be during the game, but it is part of the overall package of an NFL game.
That's the league's problem. They let it happen in the first place, and now they've got to deal with the consequences. And again players weren't even ON the field during it, until less than a decade ago. And again again, nobody who hadn't been personally TO an NFL game would have even known it was done at all, since it's also not part of the telecasts, so now we've got the naked hypocrisy of fake-outrage about fake-patriotism being obediently droned by the unwashed who were ordered to play the part, and fall all over themselves to Obey. Which is disgusting.
I don't care about kneeling players. They can kneel or not during the anthem. I don't watch the games to get their personal political or social views. That said, if the NFL wants to require players to stand during the anthem at games, they can do so.
And yet, they don't.
I don't care about sitting/kneeling players (or fans or anybody) either. They, and I, will do what we want. But I'm not going to sit here and pretend to be outraged because some media hack(s) and some political demagogue(s) demand I do without giving any good reason.
There may not currently be a rule requiring players to stand, but there is a guideline saying they should stand.
If the NFL owners got together and decided as a group not to hire Kaepernick, they deserve to be punished for that. If he isn't being hired because of the negative publicity surrounding him, and it isn't because of any sort of hidden group decision to blackball him, that's just a consequence of his own actions.
I believe he's got a lawsuit making that case. I don't know what its status is but that's NFL business, not mine. As for the "negative publicity", it matters whether that "negative publicity" is real or fake. Just as the Pentagon-pimped fake displays matter. It's imperative to pick out the real from contrived demagoguery. Fakery is fakery.
That's why I keep railing on these klowns to explain the "reasoning" behind the fake outrage. They can't do it --- ergo fake.
I find the tradition of playing the national anthem during sporting events a very odd one. They seem like very unconnected events. That doesn't mean Kaepernick (or any other player) can kneel during the anthem at games without any consequences.
Actually it does mean that. Or more correctly it does NOT mean he can't.
And again Kaepernick was already sitting out the anthem for several games before anyone noticed and tried to milk a fake-outrage "story" out of t. And those games somehow went on like any other game. Nobody got into this fake-outrage play-acting until they were TOLD to.
Again, I've been to many a baseball game and have never once stood for a national anthem. Nobody tried to milk a story out of me, nobody declined to sell me a ticket to another game --- matter of fact, nobody ever said or did a damn thing. Which is as it should be.
It is indeed an odd thing to do assuming the event is not at the Olympics where it might make more sense. It dates from a time of gross national mob mentality hysteria (1918) --- exactly the same year that another mob demanded that one Earnest Starr bend down and kiss the flag. When he refused HE --- not the mob, but the mob's target --- was arrested and sentenced to 10-20 years hard labor ----- for refusing to go along with the mob. That mob was charged with..... nothing. And THAT is the lesson here, because that's where blind robotic obsequious zombified mob mentality leads.
I find it quite significant that the idea of attaching the national anthem to a sports event (read: a large gathering of a captive audience) happened at the same time people were getting arrested for "sedition" and hard labor for refusing a mob's demands. And that in the next year more people were getting deported for their political beliefs in the infamous Palmer Raids. That's all related. What we really should be doing during a national anthem at a sporting event is waving flags with Earnest Starr's picture on them, with the caption "Never Again" -- and observe the real significance of what's going on.
If Aaron Rodgers knelt during the anthem, would he have a job?
He should. And maybe he does, or maybe somebody else does or did, but we just didn't have a hack reporter trying to milk fake-outrage out of it.
Absolutely. Kaepernick was not a good enough QB to get away with rocking the boat the way he did.
His skills or lack thereof are still in no way related to whether he has a right to decline to play the part of marionette.
Herein lies the irony ---- the fake-outrage dolts are bemoaning the fact that here in an exercise of mob mentality coercion, here's a guy who declines to play it, and their objection is on the basis that mob mentality coercion is a "good thing". Because, again, they've been told it is and they can't lift a synapse to think for themselves. So they bleat the Establishment line, all together --- an obedient mob who love them some coercion, as long as it means taking orders without being given a good reason to take them.
We've discussed this before, and I agree that the outrage about Kaepernick kneeling seems silly and contrived. On the other hand, I don't doubt that many people are honestly upset by his actions.
Kaepernick has a right to sit or kneel during the anthem. NFL teams have a right to decide that his kneeling, combined with a variety of other factors, make him not worth signing.
Call NFL players employees or contractors, the point remains the same: the NFL has pretty broad authority to determine the the conduct of the players. Players have been fired for off-the-field conduct; things that happen during the private time of players. Players have been cut for being arrested, without having been convicted of anything. Players may have the right to protest as citizens, but that does not mean the NFL has to allow such protest from its players.
The national anthem is not integral to playing football. The NFL can decide that they want it played during games, and they can decide that players need to stand while it is played, regardless of how little the anthem has to do with the sport. Put another way, the national anthem is not a part of football, but it can be part of the NFL. Silly or not, playing the national anthem before sporting events is now a pretty normal part of American culture. Kaepernick may not have knelt during the actual game, but he did kneel during a portion of a sports event.
I agree in large part with your take on the playing of the anthem during sports events. I disagree with the impression you present that Kaepernick was not kneeling while representing the NFL.