Justice Roberts says what?

[Nostra]

Nancy's faux impeachment of Trump is beginning to fall apart already.
The Belknap "precedent" is not even a "given".
Can you say "Constitutional Crisis"?

Kamala Harris could preside over Trump impeachment trial if John Roberts doesn’t

The Constitution says that in impeachments for presidents, the chief justice of the Supreme Court is the presiding officer. For lesser impeachments, the presiding officer has been the same as for other Senate business — either the vice president or a senator. The Constitution is not clear on...

www.foxnews.com

"The Constitution says that in impeachments for presidents, the chief justice of the Supreme Court is the presiding officer. For lesser impeachments, the presiding officer has been the same as for other Senate business — either the vice president or a senator. The Constitution is not clear on who should preside over impeachments for former presidents."

So if Kamala Harris presides over Nancy's Kangaroo Court, just imagine how fast the trial will be and how little the defense will be allowed to present. OBJECTION!! What a joke. If ANY Republicans vote guilty they are done, gone, primaried and discarded.

STATEMENT: "So if Kamala Harris presides over Nancy's Kangaroo Court, just imagine how fast the trial will be and how little the defense will be allowed to present. OBJECTION!! What a joke. If ANY Republicans vote guilty they are done, gone, primaried and discarded."

RESPONSE: The Kangaroo Court was established by Moscow Mitch when Trump was first impeached. If the Chief Justice does not preside, and if the Vice President does, the trail will be just that; the defense will be allowed to present exculpatory evidence, if any attorney is willing to represent Trump and if any exculpatory evidence exists.

For the record, you don't see any conflict of interest if Kamala presides over a trial whether or not an ex-president can run against her in 2024, or be disqualified? That's just fine with you???? Besides, she is NOT an experienced judge, she was a DA, she is not even qualified to run a trial. But that would be perfect, a long shitty trial followed by another acquittal.

There is no "Moscow Mitch" only a Moscow Bernie. When you impeach for a non-crime, you get an acquittal, duh.
Trump has a good attorney, I hope he drags the trial out for 2 fucking years.

Your rambling rant rhetoric is irrational. Reasonable people understand that Vice President Harris seeks justice, and equal justice before the law. She has the chops to preside over the preceding's but it is most likely that the Chief Justice will once again serve in that capacity.

Since McConnell and Schumer will need to work out the details, I suspect it will represent a real trial, unlike the first one when only McConnell decided on the details.

Constitution calls for the Chief Justice, nobody else.

Nazi’s farce is done.

 

[Rogue AI]

Where is the Constitutional basis for continuing this farce after Trump has left office? Nobody seems able to explain that.

 

[danielpalos]

Where is the Constitutional basis for continuing this farce after Trump has left office? Nobody seems able to explain that.

He was impeached before he left office and this:
and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States

 

[Nostra]

Where is the Constitutional basis for continuing this farce after Trump has left office? Nobody seems able to explain that.

He was impeached before he left office and this:
and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States

That is after conviction, Dumbass.

 

[kyzr]

Nancy's faux impeachment of Trump is beginning to fall apart already.
The Belknap "precedent" is not even a "given".
Can you say "Constitutional Crisis"?

Kamala Harris could preside over Trump impeachment trial if John Roberts doesn’t

The Constitution says that in impeachments for presidents, the chief justice of the Supreme Court is the presiding officer. For lesser impeachments, the presiding officer has been the same as for other Senate business — either the vice president or a senator. The Constitution is not clear on...

www.foxnews.com

"The Constitution says that in impeachments for presidents, the chief justice of the Supreme Court is the presiding officer. For lesser impeachments, the presiding officer has been the same as for other Senate business — either the vice president or a senator. The Constitution is not clear on who should preside over impeachments for former presidents."

So if Kamala Harris presides over Nancy's Kangaroo Court, just imagine how fast the trial will be and how little the defense will be allowed to present. OBJECTION!! What a joke. If ANY Republicans vote guilty they are done, gone, primaried and discarded.

STATEMENT: "So if Kamala Harris presides over Nancy's Kangaroo Court, just imagine how fast the trial will be and how little the defense will be allowed to present. OBJECTION!! What a joke. If ANY Republicans vote guilty they are done, gone, primaried and discarded."

RESPONSE: The Kangaroo Court was established by Moscow Mitch when Trump was first impeached. If the Chief Justice does not preside, and if the Vice President does, the trail will be just that; the defense will be allowed to present exculpatory evidence, if any attorney is willing to represent Trump and if any exculpatory evidence exists.

For the record, you don't see any conflict of interest if Kamala presides over a trial whether or not an ex-president can run against her in 2024, or be disqualified? That's just fine with you???? Besides, she is NOT an experienced judge, she was a DA, she is not even qualified to run a trial. But that would be perfect, a long shitty trial followed by another acquittal.

There is no "Moscow Mitch" only a Moscow Bernie. When you impeach for a non-crime, you get an acquittal, duh.
Trump has a good attorney, I hope he drags the trial out for 2 fucking years.

Your rambling rant rhetoric is irrational. Reasonable people understand that Vice President Harris seeks justice, and equal justice before the law. She has the chops to preside over the preceding's but it is most likely that the Chief Justice will once again serve in that capacity.

Since McConnell and Schumer will need to work out the details, I suspect it will represent a real trial, unlike the first one when only McConnell decided on the details.

The Kangaroo Court will be a joke. Just like Nancy and Shumer deserve.

 

[danielpalos]

Where is the Constitutional basis for continuing this farce after Trump has left office? Nobody seems able to explain that.

He was impeached before he left office and this:
and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States

That is after conviction, Dumbass.

The case is about impeachment, judgement is pursuant to impeachment.

and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States

 

[Nostra]

Where is the Constitutional basis for continuing this farce after Trump has left office? Nobody seems able to explain that.

He was impeached before he left office and this:
and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States

That is after conviction, Dumbass.

The case is about impeachment, judgement is pursuant to impeachment.

and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States

You keep editing it.

Diqualification comes after conviction you raving lunatic.

 

[danielpalos]

Where is the Constitutional basis for continuing this farce after Trump has left office? Nobody seems able to explain that.

He was impeached before he left office and this:
and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States

That is after conviction, Dumbass.

The case is about impeachment, judgement is pursuant to impeachment.

and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States

You keep editing it.

Diqualification comes after conviction you raving lunatic.

No, it is just your lack of reading comprehension skills.

Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.

 

[JoeB131]

The impeachment trial process is to remove a sitting president.
Trump is no longer a sitting president, he's a private citizen.
Yes, this really could end up in front of the Supreme Court.

Anyone wonder why they didn't impeach Nixon once he resigned????

Because he actually agreed to resign. And because Ford immediately pardoned him when he left.

The thing about Nixon is he went away and never came back. Trump isn't going to do that unless we MAKE him do that.

The real question is, will Republicans take back control of this party, or will they let him keep trolling them from Mar-a-Lago?

 

[Claudette]

The impeachment trial process is to remove a sitting president.
Trump is no longer a sitting president, he's a private citizen.
Yes, this really could end up in front of the Supreme Court.

Anyone wonder why they didn't impeach Nixon once he resigned????

I agree. Trump is now a private citizen and they can't impeach him. One would think our glorious leaders would know that. And yet. It will end up in front of the SC.

 

[kyzr]

The impeachment trial process is to remove a sitting president.
Trump is no longer a sitting president, he's a private citizen.
Yes, this really could end up in front of the Supreme Court.

Anyone wonder why they didn't impeach Nixon once he resigned????

I agree. Trump is now a private citizen and they can't impeach him. One would think our glorious leaders would know that. And yet. It will end up in front of the SC.

The senate has 2-weeks to figure out how it will work.
No one is presiding yet, Justice Roberts said "no thanks, not interested, I have more important work to do".
How do you think it will end up in front of the USSC?
Who will challenge the constitutionality? The Trump team or GOP senators?

 

[Claudette]

The impeachment trial process is to remove a sitting president.
Trump is no longer a sitting president, he's a private citizen.
Yes, this really could end up in front of the Supreme Court.

Anyone wonder why they didn't impeach Nixon once he resigned????

I agree. Trump is now a private citizen and they can't impeach him. One would think our glorious leaders would know that. And yet. It will end up in front of the SC.

The senate has 2-weeks to figure out how it will work.
No one is presiding yet, Justice Roberts said "no thanks, not interested, I have more important work to do".
How do you think it will end up in front of the USSC?
Who will challenge the constitutionality? The Trump team or GOP senators?

I just think it will. Not sure why and I hope Roberts sticks to his guns.

Only an idiot would think you could impeach a civilian. These lefties sure are idiots to waste time and tax dollars on an impossibility. LOL

 

[danielpalos]

The impeachment trial process is to remove a sitting president.
Trump is no longer a sitting president, he's a private citizen.
Yes, this really could end up in front of the Supreme Court.

Anyone wonder why they didn't impeach Nixon once he resigned????

I agree. Trump is now a private citizen and they can't impeach him. One would think our glorious leaders would know that. And yet. It will end up in front of the SC.

He was already impeached. The Senate can try it and disqualify him, to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States:...

 

[Claudette]

The impeachment trial process is to remove a sitting president.
Trump is no longer a sitting president, he's a private citizen.
Yes, this really could end up in front of the Supreme Court.

Anyone wonder why they didn't impeach Nixon once he resigned????

I agree. Trump is now a private citizen and they can't impeach him. One would think our glorious leaders would know that. And yet. It will end up in front of the SC.

He was already impeached. The Senate can try it and disqualify him, to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States:...

Sure he was. That's why the Senate didn't go through with it. Trump is a private citizen so why waste the time and tax dollars on stupidity.

 

[danielpalos]

The impeachment trial process is to remove a sitting president.
Trump is no longer a sitting president, he's a private citizen.
Yes, this really could end up in front of the Supreme Court.

Anyone wonder why they didn't impeach Nixon once he resigned????

I agree. Trump is now a private citizen and they can't impeach him. One would think our glorious leaders would know that. And yet. It will end up in front of the SC.

He was already impeached. The Senate can try it and disqualify him, to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States:...

Sure he was. That's why the Senate didn't go through with it. Trump is a private citizen so why waste the time and tax dollars on stupidity.

He is already impeached. Simply banning him from public office is what they are trying to do. The Senate still has to try the impeachment.

 

[Claudette]

The impeachment trial process is to remove a sitting president.
Trump is no longer a sitting president, he's a private citizen.
Yes, this really could end up in front of the Supreme Court.

Anyone wonder why they didn't impeach Nixon once he resigned????

I agree. Trump is now a private citizen and they can't impeach him. One would think our glorious leaders would know that. And yet. It will end up in front of the SC.

He was already impeached. The Senate can try it and disqualify him, to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States:...

Sure he was. That's why the Senate didn't go through with it. Trump is a private citizen so why waste the time and tax dollars on stupidity.

He is already impeached. Simply banning him from public office is what they are trying to do. The Senate still has to try the impeachment.

Oh I think that's impossible to do. Its never been done and never will be. I doubt the Senate will go for impeachment. Its a waste of time and tax dollars.

 

[Doc7505]

JUST IN: Chief Justice Roberts Will Not Preside Over Trump Senate Impeachment Trial​

JUST IN: Chief Justice Roberts Will Not Preside Over Trump Senate Impeachment Trial (thegatewaypundit.com)
25 Jan 2021 ~~ By Cristina Laila


Chief Justice John Roberts will not preside over Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.
If was previously reported that Roberts was eager to avoid presiding over the sham impeachment of Trump because he doesn’t want to become a political lightning rod.
Senate President Pro Tempore, Pat Leahy (VT) will preside over the sham trial instead.
The Hill reported:

A Senate source said Leahy, a former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is expected to preside at the trial.​

A spokesman for Leahy said the decision on presiding over the trial is up to Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).​

There is also talk that Republican senators may choose a secret ballot so their voting base will not know how each member voted.
If they do that the party is over. It’s already floundering after House leaders Kevin McCarthy and Liz Cheney blamed President Trump for the violence in the US Capitol on January 6th.
The Democrats are also floating barring Donald Trump from ever running for office.


Comment:
Damn the law and the Constitution, Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats will use any means to destroy Trump and American Conservatism.
Chief Justice Roberts realizes that the sham trial of former President Trump is Un-Constitional.
Attorneys Alan Dershowitz and Jonathan Turley both agree that the impeachment trial is not only wrong but violates the tenets of the U.S. Constitution....
Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies and their quisling media have hit the ground running to reverse Trump' s policies. They'll soon begin to CLEANSE Trump supporters too. It's the Marxist communist wet dream come true.
The Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Leftists by their actions have proved that President Trump is actually the president now because they're trying like "Hell" to impeach him.
The majority of Americans do not believes that China Joey Xi was legitimately elected. Especially after he said, while signing 29 FAKE executive orders, that he obviously didn't even know what he was signing, but his Marxist handlers told him to sign it anyway. So as a good puppet he followed orders and signed the Executive Orders.
Americans that resist and pledge to restore America must Stay The Course.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

it is first sign that Roberts might have a tiny backbone

 

[Rambunctious]

JUST IN: Chief Justice Roberts Will Not Preside Over Trump Senate Impeachment Trial​

JUST IN: Chief Justice Roberts Will Not Preside Over Trump Senate Impeachment Trial (thegatewaypundit.com)
25 Jan 2021 ~~ By Cristina Laila


Chief Justice John Roberts will not preside over Trump’s Senate impeachment trial.
If was previously reported that Roberts was eager to avoid presiding over the sham impeachment of Trump because he doesn’t want to become a political lightning rod.
Senate President Pro Tempore, Pat Leahy (VT) will preside over the sham trial instead.
The Hill reported:

A Senate source said Leahy, a former chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is expected to preside at the trial.​

A spokesman for Leahy said the decision on presiding over the trial is up to Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.).​

There is also talk that Republican senators may choose a secret ballot so their voting base will not know how each member voted.
If they do that the party is over. It’s already floundering after House leaders Kevin McCarthy and Liz Cheney blamed President Trump for the violence in the US Capitol on January 6th.
The Democrats are also floating barring Donald Trump from ever running for office.


Comment:
Damn the law and the Constitution, Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrats will use any means to destroy Trump and American Conservatism.
Chief Justice Roberts realizes that the sham trial of former President Trump is Un-Constitional.
Attorneys Alan Dershowitz and Jonathan Turley both agree that the impeachment trial is not only wrong but violates the tenets of the U.S. Constitution....
Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Commies and their quisling media have hit the ground running to reverse Trump' s policies. They'll soon begin to CLEANSE Trump supporters too. It's the Marxist communist wet dream come true.
The Progressive Marxist/DSA Democrat Leftists by their actions have proved that President Trump is actually the president now because they're trying like "Hell" to impeach him.
The majority of Americans do not believes that China Joey Xi was legitimately elected. Especially after he said, while signing 29 FAKE executive orders, that he obviously didn't even know what he was signing, but his Marxist handlers told him to sign it anyway. So as a good puppet he followed orders and signed the Executive Orders.
Americans that resist and pledge to restore America must Stay The Course.

Guess Roberts is tired of being blackmailed by the dems....

 

[JoeMoma]

it is first sign that Roberts might have a tiny backbone

Very-very tiny.... microscopic even!