Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Honestly, it's no one else's fucking business whether a woman wants to or gets an abortion, yet this law makes it anyone's business who wants to take the time out of their day to make it theirs.That's incorrect, most women don't even know if they're pregnant or not by 6 weeks, a fetus is not a viable entity until after 24 weeks and then is still iffy before that point likelihood of survival is less than 50%. The law does not take into account rape or incest, nor does it take into consideration the many third term trimester abortions that married women have to have in order to save their lives or because the child is born we have multiple problems and most likely die anyway. these aren't decisions that should be made by the state these are decisions that have to be made by the mother the father if there if there is a husband involved and her doctor. No one else should be impeding the process. They aren't helping the issue they're hurting it.
Thus it is nobody’s business whether or not I get a vaccine. Checkmate.Honestly, it's no one else's fucking business whether a woman wants to or gets an abortion, yet this law makes it anyone's business who wants to take the time out of their day to make it theirs.
The defendants should ALWAYS file a counter claim.
Nobody is murdering children. Murder is a legal term that indicates the unlawful killing of a human being by another human being. An abortion is a lawful medical procedure.Lies as usual. We care about the unborn children a lot more than idiots like you do. Nobody is controlling the lives of women (or in your case one identifying as a woman). Merely not allowing murder of an unborn child with a heartbeat.
You know what, I really don't care if you get the vaccine or not, if you get COVID or not, if you die or not.Thus it is nobody’s business whether or not I get a vaccine. Checkmate.
NopeI don't see your answer to my question.
Do you agree that so long as a person can still buy/own/posses a gun, his right right to keep and bear arms is not impeded?
If the abortion was illegal, they they had no right to terminate the pregnancy,The most idiotic part of this law is that private citizens can attempt to personally enrich themselves to the tune of $10,000 per claim by further traumatizing women and dragging them and their business into open court simply because they've exercised their right to terminate a pregnancy.
A prime example of a non seq. Well done.I find it extremely interesting that his law passed around the same time that Texas went to Constitutional carry.
because it's unconstitutional on it's face?Why isn't the TX abortion law - like all other laws - assumed constitutional until it, specifically, is ruled unconstitutional?
But why do you believe you have the right to do that, particularly if it's not your child?Its not about controlling women's bodies, never has been. If you are a woman, and want to punch yourself in the face for 4 hours straight, nobody is going to try and stop you and "control" you. Its only when a baby is involved that they want to protect THAT life.
I've never seen any republican have any issue with a woman doing what they want with their body, except in the case of abortion, and the presence of another life.
But, this whole narrative of "repubs just want to control women" just isn't true.
It doing so violates the U.S. Constitution.Your opinion does not change the fact the law grants standing.
That;s not how it works.because it's unconstitutional on it's face?
How does granting someone standing to sue violate the US constitution?It doing so violates the U.S. Constitution.
Yet freaks like you want the right to murder unborn children. Nobody here has harassed women at clinics Karen. Head cases are people like you who celebrate murder of unborn children.Nobody is murdering children. Murder is a legal term that indicates the unlawful killing of a human being by another human being. An abortion is a lawful medical procedure.
You don't approve or believe in abortion, simple solution is don't ever have one or risk impregnating someone who might feel differently than you do.
People who are such control freaks that they have this compelling need to try to control what other people do to the point that they harass women at medical clinics or elsewhere are the real head cases here.
Am i supposed to care soy boi? Your overinflated ego just makes you blind to reality loser. Guess what? Nobody here cares if you live or die either.You know what, I really don't care if you get the vaccine or not, if you get COVID or not, if you die or not.
Honestly.
Women have been getting abortions, legal or not for as long as they've been getting pregnant.If the abortion was illegal, they they had no right to terminate the pregnancy,
A prime example of a non seq. Well done.
That's not a non seq, I'm pointing out that the stalkers may start getting shot.A prime example of a non seq. Well done.
Well you think Ashli Babbett was mudered so you've already demonstrated your lack of critical thinking abilities.Yet freaks like you want the right to murder unborn children. Nobody here has harassed women at clinics Karen. Head cases are people like you who celebrate murder of unborn children.
Well you may not care if I live or not but it's not true that NOBODY cares lol. On the other hand, it's very much true that I probably wouldn't even notice if you suddenly disappeared.Am i supposed to care soy boi? Your overinflated ego just makes you blind to reality loser. Guess what? Nobody here cares if you live or die either.
Doesn't change the fact that if the abortion is illegal they do not have an right to terminate the pregnancy.Women have been getting abortions, legal or not for as long as they've been getting pregnant.
Justice department? That's a joke.
I haven't read the law only the analysis of it and I believe that a law granting private citizens standing to enforce criminal law as well as providing a cause of action that allows them to enrich themselves at the expense of another without having been personally harmed, violates the rights of the women involved.How does granting someone standing to sue violate the US constitution?
Aside from showing that no banned abortion occurred, the only valid argument for defendants appears to be if they acted on the belief, “after conducting a reasonable investigation, that the physician performing or inducing the abortion had complied or would comply” with the ban. The law does not say what constitutes a reasonable investigation.
Defendants could be liable if they act in accordance with a court ruling that is subsequently overturned. In other words, if an appellate court were to find S.B. 8 unconstitutional, abortions resumed, and the Supreme Court later overruled the appellate court, people could be sued for actions taken while the law was suspended.
Notably, the burden is on defendants to prove they did not break the law, not on the plaintiffs to prove that the law was broken — the opposite of normal legal practice.
The standard of proof is “a preponderance of the evidence,” meaning defendants must show a greater than 50 percent chance that they are right. That is the normal standard in civil trials (in contrast to the stricter “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard in criminal trials), but the burden normally belongs to the accuser, not the accused.
The lawsuit comes after the woman has an illegal abortion.I haven't read the law only the analysis of it and I believe that a law granting private citizens standing to enforce criminal law as well as providing a cause of action that allows them to enrich themselves at the expense of another without having been personally harmed, violates the rights of the women involved.
You're right - a lawsuit specifically allowed by law is not, under any legal definition, intimidation.I'm not making a case...
Non seq - it is legal for you to carry a weapon.There are a lot of people who hate the fact that I carry a weapon but there is nothing that they can do about it other than harass me and complain, they can't prevent me from carrying but let's say that they changed the laws so that ever time they saw me in public they could snap a picture and go and file a civil complaint against me and get a judgment for $10,000.
