JUST IN: Rand Paul says he "probably will" disclose whistleblower's name

[Slade3200]

He is using the same tactic he always uses. Attack the attacker. Find a weakness and exploit it. It’s how he changes the narrative. The media feeds off new drama so by flooding the zone with conspiracy theories and accusations he washes out the negative news that he’s facing. I will say... he is a master of creating and controlling chaos to work in his favor. People need to smarten up.

You're right. If someone attacks Trump, he attacks back.

And that's what infuriates the libs so much. They never saw a Republican who actually fought back and fought back successfully against bullshit charges.

Back in the day, the Media had a monopoly.

That isn't the case today. President Trump can, and does, communicate directly with the people by way of Twitter bypassing so-called "journalists". So if some pathetic loser decides to attack the President at 9:30 p.m., Trump can respond before the 11 p.m. news if he so chooses.

And let's just speculate for a bit...

IF what anyaccuser said was the TRUTH, and the President's attack back an hour later was a LIE, would that be an abuse of his power?

Have you noticed that your sort is now avoiding 'quid pro quo,' and has moved on to 'extortion and bribery'?

Are you confused why? QPQ isn’t a crime. Extortion and bribery is a crime.

 

[PoliticalChic]

He is using the same tactic he always uses. Attack the attacker. Find a weakness and exploit it. It’s how he changes the narrative. The media feeds off new drama so by flooding the zone with conspiracy theories and accusations he washes out the negative news that he’s facing. I will say... he is a master of creating and controlling chaos to work in his favor. People need to smarten up.

You're right. If someone attacks Trump, he attacks back.

And that's what infuriates the libs so much. They never saw a Republican who actually fought back and fought back successfully against bullshit charges.

Back in the day, the Media had a monopoly.

That isn't the case today. President Trump can, and does, communicate directly with the people by way of Twitter bypassing so-called "journalists". So if some pathetic loser decides to attack the President at 9:30 p.m., Trump can respond before the 11 p.m. news if he so chooses.

And let's just speculate for a bit...

IF what anyaccuser said was the TRUTH, and the President's attack back an hour later was a LIE, would that be an abuse of his power?

Have you noticed that your sort is now avoiding 'quid pro quo,' and has moved on to 'extortion and bribery'?

Are you confused why? QPQ isn’t a crime. Extortion and bribery is a crime.

Let's connect the dots.


First collusion, collusion, collusion failed

Russia, Russia, Russia failed.

Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction failed.

Racist, Racist, Racist failed.

Impeach, Impeach, Impeach failed.

Recession, Recession, Recession failed.

Emoluments, 25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, ‘lynching,’one after another lead balloons.

Soon we'll be able to add 'extortion and bribery' to the list of failed coup attempts.



To prevent you Democrats from injuring yourselves, the best course of action is to volunteer for a four year medically induced coma. Come back after Trump leaves office.

 

[Slade3200]

He is using the same tactic he always uses. Attack the attacker. Find a weakness and exploit it. It’s how he changes the narrative. The media feeds off new drama so by flooding the zone with conspiracy theories and accusations he washes out the negative news that he’s facing. I will say... he is a master of creating and controlling chaos to work in his favor. People need to smarten up.

You're right. If someone attacks Trump, he attacks back.

And that's what infuriates the libs so much. They never saw a Republican who actually fought back and fought back successfully against bullshit charges.

Back in the day, the Media had a monopoly.

That isn't the case today. President Trump can, and does, communicate directly with the people by way of Twitter bypassing so-called "journalists". So if some pathetic loser decides to attack the President at 9:30 p.m., Trump can respond before the 11 p.m. news if he so chooses.

And let's just speculate for a bit...

IF what anyaccuser said was the TRUTH, and the President's attack back an hour later was a LIE, would that be an abuse of his power?

Have you noticed that your sort is now avoiding 'quid pro quo,' and has moved on to 'extortion and bribery'?

Are you confused why? QPQ isn’t a crime. Extortion and bribery is a crime.

Let's connect the dots.


First collusion, collusion, collusion failed

Russia, Russia, Russia failed.

Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction failed.

Racist, Racist, Racist failed.

Impeach, Impeach, Impeach failed.

Recession, Recession, Recession failed.

Emoluments, 25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, ‘lynching,’one after another lead balloons.

Soon we'll be able to add 'extortion and bribery' to the list of failed coup attempts.



To prevent you Democrats from injuring yourselves, the best course of action is to volunteer for a four year medically induced coma. Come back after Trump leaves office.

you ignore the thing that’s creating the dots. Lies lies lies. When trump lies nonstop people question and investigate. That’s how it works.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You're right. If someone attacks Trump, he attacks back.

And that's what infuriates the libs so much. They never saw a Republican who actually fought back and fought back successfully against bullshit charges.

Back in the day, the Media had a monopoly.

That isn't the case today. President Trump can, and does, communicate directly with the people by way of Twitter bypassing so-called "journalists". So if some pathetic loser decides to attack the President at 9:30 p.m., Trump can respond before the 11 p.m. news if he so chooses.

And let's just speculate for a bit...

IF what anyaccuser said was the TRUTH, and the President's attack back an hour later was a LIE, would that be an abuse of his power?

Have you noticed that your sort is now avoiding 'quid pro quo,' and has moved on to 'extortion and bribery'?

Are you confused why? QPQ isn’t a crime. Extortion and bribery is a crime.

Let's connect the dots.


First collusion, collusion, collusion failed

Russia, Russia, Russia failed.

Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction failed.

Racist, Racist, Racist failed.

Impeach, Impeach, Impeach failed.

Recession, Recession, Recession failed.

Emoluments, 25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, ‘lynching,’one after another lead balloons.

Soon we'll be able to add 'extortion and bribery' to the list of failed coup attempts.



To prevent you Democrats from injuring yourselves, the best course of action is to volunteer for a four year medically induced coma. Come back after Trump leaves office.

you ignore the thing that’s creating the dots. Lies lies lies. When trump lies nonstop people question and investigate. That’s how it works.

Not at all.

All of the failed attacks are lies.

I recall having a history of revealing your lies.


When I posted that Obama and the Democrats awarded the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism, nuclear weapons.....guaranteed same to the barbarians....


...you lied and denied it....even when I proved same, here:

Actually Allowed To Think!




1. NPR wrote that they were restricted for 10 years:

"Perhaps the biggest unknown is what happens to that breakout time once some of the terms of this deal start to expire 10 and 15 years from now.

In an interview with NPR after the framework of this agreement was reached, President Obama conceded that "at that point the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero."

But this deal, Obama argued at the time, buys the United States at least a decade."
6 Things You Should Know About The Iran Nuclear Deal


And that was written three years ago.


2. There was never....NEVER....any reason to allow the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism to have nuclear weapons.


3. The sanctions were strangling them.

This from the Left-leaning Brookings Institute...

"....the sanctions against Iran — and the context for them internationally and within Iran — have changed dramatically. Since 2010, the sanctions’ impact on Iran has been severe: its oil exports and revenues plummeted; the value of its currency eroded; trade disruptions shuttered businesses and exacerbated inflation. Quietly, a backlash emerged among Iran’s political elites against the country’s creeping isolation, and the June 2013 presidential election ushered in a moderate new president and the beginnings of a diplomatic breakthrough on the nuclear crisis — achievements that most observers attribute to the impact of sanctions."
Why “Iran Style” Sanctions Worked Against Tehran (And Why They Might Not Succeed with Moscow)






“And when did Obama tell illegals to vote? Another one of your idiotic lies”

Laughing At The Left


I proved that as well....with his own words, and a video of him encouraging the illegals.


Now you've been exposed as a lying low-life.....twice....and remain so.





And…your third strike, here:

I proved that there are no "white supremacists."

The term is a created 'term of art' to fuel dunces like you.




Let's prove it together:

The Left loves making up meaningless slurs....such as "....white supremacists"....playing on the fact that without the black vote, Democrats would never win a national election.

But....it's simply more 'fake news'.....



Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.


"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST



I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.


The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Fake news.




Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

Just one more lie by the the Lying Liberal Left.....but dolts buy it like it was on sale.




BTW.....in this majority-white nation, the racial group with the highest family incomes, highest educational attainments, and lowest crime rates....

....is not white.

When you get a brain-transplant, you'll figure out what that means.



Dismissed.

 

[Slade3200]

And let's just speculate for a bit...

IF what anyaccuser said was the TRUTH, and the President's attack back an hour later was a LIE, would that be an abuse of his power?

Have you noticed that your sort is now avoiding 'quid pro quo,' and has moved on to 'extortion and bribery'?

Are you confused why? QPQ isn’t a crime. Extortion and bribery is a crime.

Let's connect the dots.


First collusion, collusion, collusion failed

Russia, Russia, Russia failed.

Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction failed.

Racist, Racist, Racist failed.

Impeach, Impeach, Impeach failed.

Recession, Recession, Recession failed.

Emoluments, 25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, ‘lynching,’one after another lead balloons.

Soon we'll be able to add 'extortion and bribery' to the list of failed coup attempts.



To prevent you Democrats from injuring yourselves, the best course of action is to volunteer for a four year medically induced coma. Come back after Trump leaves office.

you ignore the thing that’s creating the dots. Lies lies lies. When trump lies nonstop people question and investigate. That’s how it works.

Not at all.

All of the failed attacks are lies.

I recall having a history of revealing your lies.


When I posted that Obama and the Democrats awarded the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism, nuclear weapons.....guaranteed same to the barbarians....


...you lied and denied it....even when I proved same, here:

Actually Allowed To Think!




1. NPR wrote that they were restricted for 10 years:

"Perhaps the biggest unknown is what happens to that breakout time once some of the terms of this deal start to expire 10 and 15 years from now.

In an interview with NPR after the framework of this agreement was reached, President Obama conceded that "at that point the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero."

But this deal, Obama argued at the time, buys the United States at least a decade."
6 Things You Should Know About The Iran Nuclear Deal


And that was written three years ago.


2. There was never....NEVER....any reason to allow the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism to have nuclear weapons.


3. The sanctions were strangling them.

This from the Left-leaning Brookings Institute...

"....the sanctions against Iran — and the context for them internationally and within Iran — have changed dramatically. Since 2010, the sanctions’ impact on Iran has been severe: its oil exports and revenues plummeted; the value of its currency eroded; trade disruptions shuttered businesses and exacerbated inflation. Quietly, a backlash emerged among Iran’s political elites against the country’s creeping isolation, and the June 2013 presidential election ushered in a moderate new president and the beginnings of a diplomatic breakthrough on the nuclear crisis — achievements that most observers attribute to the impact of sanctions."
Why “Iran Style” Sanctions Worked Against Tehran (And Why They Might Not Succeed with Moscow)






“And when did Obama tell illegals to vote? Another one of your idiotic lies”

Laughing At The Left


I proved that as well....with his own words, and a video of him encouraging the illegals.


Now you've been exposed as a lying low-life.....twice....and remain so.





And…your third strike, here:

I proved that there are no "white supremacists."

The term is a created 'term of art' to fuel dunces like you.




Let's prove it together:

The Left loves making up meaningless slurs....such as "....white supremacists"....playing on the fact that without the black vote, Democrats would never win a national election.

But....it's simply more 'fake news'.....



Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.


"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST



I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.


The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Fake news.




Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

Just one more lie by the the Lying Liberal Left.....but dolts buy it like it was on sale.




BTW.....in this majority-white nation, the racial group with the highest family incomes, highest educational attainments, and lowest crime rates....

....is not white.

When you get a brain-transplant, you'll figure out what that means.



Dismissed.

I debunked all your points but somehow that registered as a victory in your mind?! Wow. You might qualify as legitimately insane.

 

[Kondor3]

I wonder if any of you idiots have considered the long term repercussions of this?

Long term repercussions are irrelevant.

Your Honor... the Prosecution rests.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Have you noticed that your sort is now avoiding 'quid pro quo,' and has moved on to 'extortion and bribery'?

Are you confused why? QPQ isn’t a crime. Extortion and bribery is a crime.

Let's connect the dots.


First collusion, collusion, collusion failed

Russia, Russia, Russia failed.

Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction failed.

Racist, Racist, Racist failed.

Impeach, Impeach, Impeach failed.

Recession, Recession, Recession failed.

Emoluments, 25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, ‘lynching,’one after another lead balloons.

Soon we'll be able to add 'extortion and bribery' to the list of failed coup attempts.



To prevent you Democrats from injuring yourselves, the best course of action is to volunteer for a four year medically induced coma. Come back after Trump leaves office.

you ignore the thing that’s creating the dots. Lies lies lies. When trump lies nonstop people question and investigate. That’s how it works.

Not at all.

All of the failed attacks are lies.

I recall having a history of revealing your lies.


When I posted that Obama and the Democrats awarded the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism, nuclear weapons.....guaranteed same to the barbarians....


...you lied and denied it....even when I proved same, here:

Actually Allowed To Think!




1. NPR wrote that they were restricted for 10 years:

"Perhaps the biggest unknown is what happens to that breakout time once some of the terms of this deal start to expire 10 and 15 years from now.

In an interview with NPR after the framework of this agreement was reached, President Obama conceded that "at that point the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero."

But this deal, Obama argued at the time, buys the United States at least a decade."
6 Things You Should Know About The Iran Nuclear Deal


And that was written three years ago.


2. There was never....NEVER....any reason to allow the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism to have nuclear weapons.


3. The sanctions were strangling them.

This from the Left-leaning Brookings Institute...

"....the sanctions against Iran — and the context for them internationally and within Iran — have changed dramatically. Since 2010, the sanctions’ impact on Iran has been severe: its oil exports and revenues plummeted; the value of its currency eroded; trade disruptions shuttered businesses and exacerbated inflation. Quietly, a backlash emerged among Iran’s political elites against the country’s creeping isolation, and the June 2013 presidential election ushered in a moderate new president and the beginnings of a diplomatic breakthrough on the nuclear crisis — achievements that most observers attribute to the impact of sanctions."
Why “Iran Style” Sanctions Worked Against Tehran (And Why They Might Not Succeed with Moscow)






“And when did Obama tell illegals to vote? Another one of your idiotic lies”

Laughing At The Left


I proved that as well....with his own words, and a video of him encouraging the illegals.


Now you've been exposed as a lying low-life.....twice....and remain so.





And…your third strike, here:

I proved that there are no "white supremacists."

The term is a created 'term of art' to fuel dunces like you.




Let's prove it together:

The Left loves making up meaningless slurs....such as "....white supremacists"....playing on the fact that without the black vote, Democrats would never win a national election.

But....it's simply more 'fake news'.....



Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.


"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST



I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.


The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Fake news.




Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

Just one more lie by the the Lying Liberal Left.....but dolts buy it like it was on sale.




BTW.....in this majority-white nation, the racial group with the highest family incomes, highest educational attainments, and lowest crime rates....

....is not white.

When you get a brain-transplant, you'll figure out what that means.



Dismissed.

I debunked all your points but somehow that registered as a victory in your mind?! Wow. You might qualify as legitimately insane.

You're lying again.

I documented each and every one.



Now that you’ve been thoroughly exposed as the lying low-life that you are, time for your retreat to your warehouse, farmhouse, henhouse, outhouse, doghouse, whatever….

 

[Slade3200]

Are you confused why? QPQ isn’t a crime. Extortion and bribery is a crime.

Let's connect the dots.


First collusion, collusion, collusion failed

Russia, Russia, Russia failed.

Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction failed.

Racist, Racist, Racist failed.

Impeach, Impeach, Impeach failed.

Recession, Recession, Recession failed.

Emoluments, 25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, ‘lynching,’one after another lead balloons.

Soon we'll be able to add 'extortion and bribery' to the list of failed coup attempts.



To prevent you Democrats from injuring yourselves, the best course of action is to volunteer for a four year medically induced coma. Come back after Trump leaves office.

you ignore the thing that’s creating the dots. Lies lies lies. When trump lies nonstop people question and investigate. That’s how it works.

Not at all.

All of the failed attacks are lies.

I recall having a history of revealing your lies.


When I posted that Obama and the Democrats awarded the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism, nuclear weapons.....guaranteed same to the barbarians....


...you lied and denied it....even when I proved same, here:

Actually Allowed To Think!




1. NPR wrote that they were restricted for 10 years:

"Perhaps the biggest unknown is what happens to that breakout time once some of the terms of this deal start to expire 10 and 15 years from now.

In an interview with NPR after the framework of this agreement was reached, President Obama conceded that "at that point the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero."

But this deal, Obama argued at the time, buys the United States at least a decade."
6 Things You Should Know About The Iran Nuclear Deal


And that was written three years ago.


2. There was never....NEVER....any reason to allow the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism to have nuclear weapons.


3. The sanctions were strangling them.

This from the Left-leaning Brookings Institute...

"....the sanctions against Iran — and the context for them internationally and within Iran — have changed dramatically. Since 2010, the sanctions’ impact on Iran has been severe: its oil exports and revenues plummeted; the value of its currency eroded; trade disruptions shuttered businesses and exacerbated inflation. Quietly, a backlash emerged among Iran’s political elites against the country’s creeping isolation, and the June 2013 presidential election ushered in a moderate new president and the beginnings of a diplomatic breakthrough on the nuclear crisis — achievements that most observers attribute to the impact of sanctions."
Why “Iran Style” Sanctions Worked Against Tehran (And Why They Might Not Succeed with Moscow)






“And when did Obama tell illegals to vote? Another one of your idiotic lies”

Laughing At The Left


I proved that as well....with his own words, and a video of him encouraging the illegals.


Now you've been exposed as a lying low-life.....twice....and remain so.





And…your third strike, here:

I proved that there are no "white supremacists."

The term is a created 'term of art' to fuel dunces like you.




Let's prove it together:

The Left loves making up meaningless slurs....such as "....white supremacists"....playing on the fact that without the black vote, Democrats would never win a national election.

But....it's simply more 'fake news'.....



Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.


"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST



I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.


The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Fake news.




Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

Just one more lie by the the Lying Liberal Left.....but dolts buy it like it was on sale.




BTW.....in this majority-white nation, the racial group with the highest family incomes, highest educational attainments, and lowest crime rates....

....is not white.

When you get a brain-transplant, you'll figure out what that means.



Dismissed.

I debunked all your points but somehow that registered as a victory in your mind?! Wow. You might qualify as legitimately insane.

You're lying again.

I documented each and every one.



Now that you’ve been thoroughly exposed as the lying low-life that you are, time for your retreat to your warehouse, farmhouse, henhouse, outhouse, doghouse, whatever….

Haha, yeah you posted your silly points but notice it was all about you and your rants. You didn’t post anything that I said that was a lie. As for the idiotic cases that you were making, I can easily debunk once again.

1. You claim Obama awarded Nuclear weapons to Iran. Iran does not have Nuclear weapons so they were not rewarded with any. That one is false on its face.

2. You claimed Obama told illegals to vote and the. You posted a video that did NOT show him telling illegals to vote. Strike two

3. Were you really trying to prove there is no such thing as white suprematists? Is that really a serious thing? I go back to my insane comment.

 

[Faun]

Are you confused why? QPQ isn’t a crime. Extortion and bribery is a crime.

Let's connect the dots.


First collusion, collusion, collusion failed

Russia, Russia, Russia failed.

Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction failed.

Racist, Racist, Racist failed.

Impeach, Impeach, Impeach failed.

Recession, Recession, Recession failed.

Emoluments, 25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, ‘lynching,’one after another lead balloons.

Soon we'll be able to add 'extortion and bribery' to the list of failed coup attempts.



To prevent you Democrats from injuring yourselves, the best course of action is to volunteer for a four year medically induced coma. Come back after Trump leaves office.

you ignore the thing that’s creating the dots. Lies lies lies. When trump lies nonstop people question and investigate. That’s how it works.

Not at all.

All of the failed attacks are lies.

I recall having a history of revealing your lies.


When I posted that Obama and the Democrats awarded the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism, nuclear weapons.....guaranteed same to the barbarians....


...you lied and denied it....even when I proved same, here:

Actually Allowed To Think!




1. NPR wrote that they were restricted for 10 years:

"Perhaps the biggest unknown is what happens to that breakout time once some of the terms of this deal start to expire 10 and 15 years from now.

In an interview with NPR after the framework of this agreement was reached, President Obama conceded that "at that point the breakout times would have shrunk almost down to zero."

But this deal, Obama argued at the time, buys the United States at least a decade."
6 Things You Should Know About The Iran Nuclear Deal


And that was written three years ago.


2. There was never....NEVER....any reason to allow the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism to have nuclear weapons.


3. The sanctions were strangling them.

This from the Left-leaning Brookings Institute...

"....the sanctions against Iran — and the context for them internationally and within Iran — have changed dramatically. Since 2010, the sanctions’ impact on Iran has been severe: its oil exports and revenues plummeted; the value of its currency eroded; trade disruptions shuttered businesses and exacerbated inflation. Quietly, a backlash emerged among Iran’s political elites against the country’s creeping isolation, and the June 2013 presidential election ushered in a moderate new president and the beginnings of a diplomatic breakthrough on the nuclear crisis — achievements that most observers attribute to the impact of sanctions."
Why “Iran Style” Sanctions Worked Against Tehran (And Why They Might Not Succeed with Moscow)






“And when did Obama tell illegals to vote? Another one of your idiotic lies”

Laughing At The Left


I proved that as well....with his own words, and a video of him encouraging the illegals.


Now you've been exposed as a lying low-life.....twice....and remain so.





And…your third strike, here:

I proved that there are no "white supremacists."

The term is a created 'term of art' to fuel dunces like you.




Let's prove it together:

The Left loves making up meaningless slurs....such as "....white supremacists"....playing on the fact that without the black vote, Democrats would never win a national election.

But....it's simply more 'fake news'.....



Neither being white, nor using the term 'white supremacists,' I looked up the term.


"a person who believes that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races"
Definition of WHITE SUPREMACIST



I really can't get too excited, nor see it as a pejorative, if any individual of any race sees his/her group as the very best, i.e., superior to any other group.


The proof that it is a made-up smear, a chimera....the usual strategy of the Left, is the secondary phrase in the definition..."and that white people should have control over people of other races"


Clearly this is totally bogus.

Fake news.




Or....let's see some examples of any American leaders, white, black, yellow....who demand "control over people of other races"


There are none.
QED....there is no such thing as "white supremacists."

Just one more lie by the the Lying Liberal Left.....but dolts buy it like it was on sale.




BTW.....in this majority-white nation, the racial group with the highest family incomes, highest educational attainments, and lowest crime rates....

....is not white.

When you get a brain-transplant, you'll figure out what that means.



Dismissed.

I debunked all your points but somehow that registered as a victory in your mind?! Wow. You might qualify as legitimately insane.

You're lying again.

I documented each and every one.



Now that you’ve been thoroughly exposed as the lying low-life that you are, time for your retreat to your warehouse, farmhouse, henhouse, outhouse, doghouse, whatever….

LOLOL

This from the forum imbecile who actually asserted there might be as many as 80 million illegal aliens in the country.

You cray-cray.

 

[Olde Europe]

I have a hard time taking anything either side claims about whistleblowers seriously while Snowden is still wanted by the government.

It's also hard to take seriously those who avoid subpoena's by those who argued to throw Manning in prison for avoiding one.

IMO both sides deserve each other here and hopefully in the end it turns the people against both corrupt hypocritical parties.

Snowden leaked to the press. The current whistle-blower did his thing by the book. Is that difference somehow unclear?

What subpoenas and Manning have to do with all this is unclear to me. The one who avoids subpoenas, and orders his underlings to do so, is Trump. Also, it's entirely incomprehensible how you arrived at the seemingly predetermined "both sides" conclusion.

 

[pknopp]

I have a hard time taking anything either side claims about whistleblowers seriously while Snowden is still wanted by the government.

It's also hard to take seriously those who avoid subpoena's by those who argued to throw Manning in prison for avoiding one.

IMO both sides deserve each other here and hopefully in the end it turns the people against both corrupt hypocritical parties.

Snowden leaked to the press. The current whistle-blower did his thing by the book. Is that difference somehow unclear?

Snowden did it by the book. He went through the proper channels. When those channels did nothing he had no choice but go beyond that. Exposing unconstitutional actions on the part of the government should always be commended and that is what he did.

He wouldn't have had to do that if Clapper had not been allowed to commit perjury before the entire country.

What subpoenas and Manning have to do with all this is unclear to me. The one who avoids subpoenas, and orders his underlings to do so, is Trump. Also, it's entirely incomprehensible how you arrived at the seemingly predetermined "both sides" conclusion.

I think you are making my argument for me.

 

[Lastamender]

Great news. The leaker needs to be exposed. Democrats aren't going to be pleased with this.

Rand Paul says he 'probably will' disclose whistleblower's name

I'm not surprised, it's not illegal to do so, it is only one more example of a morally corrupt Republican Party.

Stop talking about morals. You haven't a leg to stand on.

I have two legs to stand on, and your comment is both an ad hominem and an idiot-gram.

I'm insulting your party. You have 0 shining examples today.

 

[Olde Europe]

I have a hard time taking anything either side claims about whistleblowers seriously while Snowden is still wanted by the government.

It's also hard to take seriously those who avoid subpoena's by those who argued to throw Manning in prison for avoiding one.

IMO both sides deserve each other here and hopefully in the end it turns the people against both corrupt hypocritical parties.

Snowden leaked to the press. The current whistle-blower did his thing by the book. Is that difference somehow unclear?

Snowden did it by the book. He went through the proper channels. When those channels did nothing he had no choice but go beyond that. Exposing unconstitutional actions on the part of the government should always be commended and that is what he did.

He wouldn't have had to do that if Clapper had not been allowed to commit perjury before the entire country.

What subpoenas and Manning have to do with all this is unclear to me. The one who avoids subpoenas, and orders his underlings to do so, is Trump. Also, it's entirely incomprehensible how you arrived at the seemingly predetermined "both sides" conclusion.

I think you are making my argument for me.

No, Snowden did not do things by the book.

And I would have to make your argument for you because you can't, but I don't.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Great news. The leaker needs to be exposed. Democrats aren't going to be pleased with this.

Rand Paul says he 'probably will' disclose whistleblower's name

I'm not surprised, it's not illegal to do so, it is only one more example of a morally corrupt Republican Party.

Stop talking about morals. You haven't a leg to stand on.

I have two legs to stand on, and your comment is both an ad hominem and an idiot-gram.

I'm insulting your party. You have 0 shining examples today.

LIAR. You stated, "You (that's me) don't have a leg to stand on". You're not even a good liar, much like trump.

 

[pknopp]

I have a hard time taking anything either side claims about whistleblowers seriously while Snowden is still wanted by the government.

It's also hard to take seriously those who avoid subpoena's by those who argued to throw Manning in prison for avoiding one.

IMO both sides deserve each other here and hopefully in the end it turns the people against both corrupt hypocritical parties.

Snowden leaked to the press. The current whistle-blower did his thing by the book. Is that difference somehow unclear?

Snowden did it by the book. He went through the proper channels. When those channels did nothing he had no choice but go beyond that. Exposing unconstitutional actions on the part of the government should always be commended and that is what he did.

He wouldn't have had to do that if Clapper had not been allowed to commit perjury before the entire country.

What subpoenas and Manning have to do with all this is unclear to me. The one who avoids subpoenas, and orders his underlings to do so, is Trump. Also, it's entirely incomprehensible how you arrived at the seemingly predetermined "both sides" conclusion.

I think you are making my argument for me.

No, Snowden did not do things by the book.

And I would have to make your argument for you because you can't, but I don't.

Sorry you do not know the history. Others tried before Snowden also and the government tried to destroy them.

Before Snowden: The Whistleblowers Who Tried To Lift The Veil

How the Pentagon punished NSA whistleblowers | Mark Hertsgaard

 

[skye]

Everybody knows the stupid traitors name.

it's no secret.

 

[Lastamender]

Great news. The leaker needs to be exposed. Democrats aren't going to be pleased with this.

Rand Paul says he 'probably will' disclose whistleblower's name

I'm not surprised, it's not illegal to do so, it is only one more example of a morally corrupt Republican Party.

Stop talking about morals. You haven't a leg to stand on.

I have two legs to stand on, and your comment is both an ad hominem and an idiot-gram.

I'm insulting your party. You have 0 shining examples today.

LIAR. You stated, "You (that's me) don't have a leg to stand on". You're not even a good liar, much like trump.

OK with me, make it you.

 

[rightwinger]

Great news. The leaker needs to be exposed. Democrats aren't going to be pleased with this.

Rand Paul says he 'probably will' disclose whistleblower's name

The Whistle Blower provided valuable information on criminal activity

He is an American Patriot

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Great news. The leaker needs to be exposed. Democrats aren't going to be pleased with this.

Rand Paul says he 'probably will' disclose whistleblower's name

he is not a true whistle blower, he is schifft's political spy

 

[Synthaholic]

When this is all over, where will Putin allow Russian Rand to live out his final years?

• Moscow
• St. Petersburg
• Crimea
• Vladivostok