JUST IN: Chip Roy Explodes Over Latest Attempt To Avert Shutdown With A CR Ahead Of Key Vote

Yes, Trump cut some places and added to other places, and the end result was more money being spent, not less. Thus there was not spending cuts, just money moved around

If I spend 50 bucks less on shoes and 100 bucks more on video games, I did not cut spending.

Which was precisely your initial point.

These Trumpbots aren't going to hold Trump accountable for anything. There's so many times when he's done some extremely leftist things, and his worshippers didn't even flinch. His campaign should've been over the minute his Obamacare replacement statements were made. "We going to cover everyone." Or when he signed his first spending bill into law. ($1.4 trillion).
 
You do not have the power now, that is why they are pretending to care about it



The GOP only tries to spend less when they are not the party in power. Why is that?

Why did Trump not try to cut spending?

Why did the Repubs not try to cut spending when they controlled the House, the Senate and the White House?
We own Congress and Congress is in charge of spending. Mike Johnson is the Speaker of the House. He is a republican. These are basic facts that i shouldnt have to explain to you.

Mike Johnson is trying to do less spending. This is a well known fact, backed up by all the drama that has happened since he became the Speaker. Every quarter dems start screaming that the GOP is going to shut down the government if they dont blow out the fucking bank. Dems want more spending, Mike Johnson wants less spending, so its impossible to come to an agreement. In the end Mike Johnson settles for just massive overspending as opposed to EXTREMELY massive overspending, That is the compromise we have to make every single fucking time and it really sucks.
 
Last edited:
Obama had been neglecting to fund defense for years.

Why wasn't that brought up?

Our military hadn't been neglected. And neither was the MIC. That was just the propaganda the government used in selling the public for all the new spending increases. Military spending is an easy sell, because the soldiers always need a raise and there's always old equipment that needs to be replaced.
90% of the military spending doesn't go to the military. That's defense spending.

Trump bragged about giving the soldiers a measly pay increase, when 90% of the money went to things like foreign political opposition campaigns or other things that have nothing to do with the soldiers.
 
Last edited:
Yes, Trump cut some places and added to other places, and the end result was more money being spent, not less. Thus there was not spending cuts, just money moved around

If I spend 50 bucks less on shoes and 100 bucks more on video games, I did not cut spending.

no matter what Trump would propose ole’ pigfaced Piglousy and all would tear it up and send their own spending. Or cause shutdown and the MSM would blame Trump 24-7 as they did for 39 days….the first time. It was Trump vs. 500 deep state. He had noidea things were as bad as they actually were. Russian collusion marlakey anyone?
 
We own Congress and Congress is in charge of spending.

You own half of Congress, The House. That is 1/3 of what it takes for the Govt to spend money.

Mike Johnson is trying to do less spending. This is a well known fact, backed up by all the drama that has happened since he became the Speaker.

He is talking about doing less spending, that is different than actually trying to do it.

In the end Mike Johnson settles for just massive overspending as opposed to EXTREMELY massive overspending, That is the compromise we have to make every single fucking time and it really sucks.

That is what they tell you so that you will keep voting for them. And it works on rubes like you
 
We own Congress

Lobbyist own congress.

and Congress is in charge of spending.

Congress is in charge of spending money that's already been appropriated and passing bills. They write the checks. But the president has to sign those checks first.
Not 1 dime gets spent by the congress that hasn't already been signed into law with an appropriations bill. Not one.
Mike Johnson is the Speaker of the House. He is a republican. These are basic facts that i shouldnt have to explain to you.

Mike Johnson is trying to do less spending. This is a well known fact, backed up by all the drama that has happened since he became the Speaker. Every quarter dems start screaming that the GOP is going to shut down the government if they dont blow out the fucking bank. Dems want more spending, Mike Johnson wants less spending, so its impossible to come to an agreement. In the end Mike Johnson settles for just massive overspending as opposed to EXTREMELY massive overspending, That is the compromise we have to make every single fucking time and it really sucks.

Mike Johnson's Liberty score. 74% <<<Big time RINO score.

Pass a $817 billion Defense spending bill without defunding military vaccine mandates
Pass a $1.5 trillion Omnibus funding Biden's vaccine mandates

73% Freedom Index score. When Trump was president, his score was in the 60's.

He can talk all the BS he wants about spending cuts, but he's yet to come up with a balance budget or sent a spending cuts appropriations bill to the senate. By now, he should've already sent them at least 5.
He, the RINO's and the dems are about to shove another CR down our throats.
 
no matter what Trump would propose ole’ pigfaced Piglousy and all would tear it up and send their own spending. Or cause shutdown and the MSM would blame Trump 24-7 as they did for 39 days….the first time. It was Trump vs. 500 deep state. He had noidea things were as bad as they actually were. Russian collusion marlakey anyone?

And as always, Trump would cave to Pelosi. Remember, he only vetoed 1 spending bill while he was president.
Because he's a weak ass RINO. Like Johnson, McCarthy and McConnell.
 
Country had to live on in order to survive.

Spending increases were not necessary?


He had to battle disgusting Marxist and turncoat R shutdowns. The Stolen 2nd term would have cleaned up a lot of the muck.

If Trump & the RINO's would've been more fiscally responsible, they wouldn't have lost their asses in 2018. In 2 years, Trump hadn't vetoed 1 spending bill. He tried to shove a national healthcare plan down our throats. By Nov. of 2018, Trump should've already gotten a balance budget, paid down at least some of the debt & secure the borders.
Hell, by then he should've already had Hillary locked up.

He handed the 2018 mid terms over to the house democrats. Not because it was rigged. But because Trump wasn't following through on his promises to be fiscally conservative with our money. The Republicans didn't get what they thought they were getting, so they didn't show up to vote.


It’s unfixable now. Country is destroyed w/o complete rebuild. The commee have won the first 50 yrs battle, the war is on-going.//

Congratulations. Tell your grandchildren they will have to fight and rebuild What DEM have caused.

Trump should learn something from DeSantis. CUT spending, cut & eliminate taxes. Stay within budget. Listen to his voters and fight for things that are important to them. Not go off on some tangent about Paris climate accords or bashing people on twitter (constantly).
We wanted budget cuts, a balanced budget, the border secured, Hillary locked up, the swamp drained and the national debt paid down.

You can blame the left all you want. But as long as Trumps signature is on it, it's all on him.
 
You own half of Congress, The House. That is 1/3 of what it takes for the Govt to spend money.



He is talking about doing less spending, that is different than actually trying to do it.



That is what they tell you so that you will keep voting for them. And it works on rubes like you
Youre the fucking rube who cant see the obvious. It is not exactly a secret which party is for more spending. :cuckoo:
 
Youre the fucking rube who cant see the obvious. It is not exactly a secret which party is for more spending. :cuckoo:

you are right, it is not. Both are for more spending, that is why spending has not been cut no matter which is in power
 
you are right, it is not. Both are for more spending, that is why spending has not been cut no matter which is in power

This is so easy to understand. And yet, they still don't get it. They've been brainwashed into thinking the left is the big spenders. Even the facts won't convince them. Even members of the GOP like Chip Roy and Rand Paul can tell them, and they'd still try to spin it.
 
He handed the 2018 mid terms over to the house democrats. Not because it was rigged. But because Trump wasn't following through on his promises to be fiscally conservative with our money.

Trump never promised to be be fiscally conservative, he has never claimed to be fiscally conservative, in fact he joked about being the king of debt.
 
Trump never promised to be be fiscally conservative, he has never claimed to be fiscally conservative, in fact he joked about being the king of debt.

He made many fiscally conservative promises. At least when he was campaigning. Afterward becoming president, not so much.
 

Forum List

Back
Top