I have been on two juries, one in Oakland and one in San Jose. Both trials lasted a week including deliberation.
The first case involved robbery, and we found the two defendants guilty. The second case was about grand theft, which we acquitted the defendant.
A few oddities:
In the first case, one of the defendants had only one leg. We found out after the case the defendant had lost the leg in a previous officer shooting not related to this case (it was not revealed as to not influence the decision on this case). So jokingly we could say the dude didn't have a leg to stand on. (rimshot)
On the second case, one of our jurors was deaf, so we had a deaf-language interpreter during the trial and deliberation. In the initial vote, we were split whether to convict or acquit. The deaf man was on the side of conviction and was one of the last to convince to acquit. We had enough reasonable doubt.
Both trials the jurors were eager to wrap it up on Friday and not have to come back the following week. In the Oakland trial, one the day we were deliberating, they took us out to a nice little Cajun restaurant.
I was also in a jury pool in Fremont, but the lawyers settled before they started interviewing prospective jurors.
I was also recruited to be a potential grand juror in San Jose. That would have been an eighteen month commitment where we would meet on Thursdays (excluding holidays). They selected all of the jurors and alternates before they interviewed me, so I was off the hook.