Judge Who Ruled Against NSA Surveillance Is Trustee For Group Who Donated To The ACLU

GotZoom

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2005
Messages
5,719
Reaction score
367
Points
48
Location
Cordova, TN
Conflict of interest? Nahhhhh

-----

LANSING, Mich. — A conservative watchdog group says the judge who declared President Bush's warrantless surveillance program unconstitutional may have a conflict of interest because she sits on the board of a foundation that has given money to the chief plaintiff in the case.

Judicial Watch, which advocates judicial accountability, said it discovered U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor's monetary tie after reviewing her financial disclosure statements.

The judge is the secretary and a trustee for the nonprofit Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan. The foundation's Web site shows it gave $45,000 to the American Civil Liberties Union to back a gay rights project. The ACLU has challenged the warrantless surveillance program.

"There has to be an appearance that justice is being fairly administered," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said Tuesday. "The court's role in awarding a grant to the ACLU and whether or not that is an issue is something that needs to be fully examined."

Taylor declined to comment, as did the Justice Department, which is asking the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati to overturn Taylor's ruling issued Thursday.

ACLU of Michigan Executive Director Kary Moss said the group did not know about the judge's affiliation with the nonprofit but added she did not think it is a "big story."

"We don't think recusal would have been necessary," Moss said.

The foundation released a statement Tuesday saying Taylor is one of 50 volunteer members of its board of trustees, which oversees grant-making decisions.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,209956,00.html
 

dmp

Senior Member
Joined
May 12, 2004
Messages
13,088
Reaction score
746
Points
48
Location
Enterprise, Alabama
You can actually HEAR your radio? Wow. That must be SO cool! :D
Not sure how much experience you have playing with..uh...knobs...but...one of them controlls volume! Check your radio!! :D

If kids are making noise enough to cover the volume of the radio, I use 'five-acorss-the-eyes' as an effective 'mute' switch.

:D
 

Nienna

VIP Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2005
Messages
4,515
Reaction score
334
Points
83
Location
Ohio
Not sure how much experience you have playing with..uh...knobs...but...one of them controlls volume! Check your radio!! :D

If kids are making noise enough to cover the volume of the radio, I use 'five-acorss-the-eyes' as an effective 'mute' switch.

:D
Arms not long enough to reach back of minivan. :( Maybe I should beef up on my vitamin E. ;)
 

Bonnie

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2004
Messages
9,476
Reaction score
669
Points
48
Location
Wherever
Conflict of interest? Nahhhhh

-----

LANSING, Mich. — A conservative watchdog group says the judge who declared President Bush's warrantless surveillance program unconstitutional may have a conflict of interest because she sits on the board of a foundation that has given money to the chief plaintiff in the case.

Judicial Watch, which advocates judicial accountability, said it discovered U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor's monetary tie after reviewing her financial disclosure statements.

The judge is the secretary and a trustee for the nonprofit Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan. The foundation's Web site shows it gave $45,000 to the American Civil Liberties Union to back a gay rights project. The ACLU has challenged the warrantless surveillance program.

"There has to be an appearance that justice is being fairly administered," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said Tuesday. "The court's role in awarding a grant to the ACLU and whether or not that is an issue is something that needs to be fully examined."

Taylor declined to comment, as did the Justice Department, which is asking the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati to overturn Taylor's ruling issued Thursday.

ACLU of Michigan Executive Director Kary Moss said the group did not know about the judge's affiliation with the nonprofit but added she did not think it is a "big story."
"We don't think recusal would have been necessary," Moss said.

The foundation released a statement Tuesday saying Taylor is one of 50 volunteer members of its board of trustees, which oversees grant-making decisions.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,209956,00.html
Yes Riiight!! Why am I not surprised at both the story and the ensuing excuses being made for this???
 

theHawk

Registered Conservative
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
32,356
Reaction score
17,276
Points
1,905
Location
Arizona
ACLU of Michigan Executive Director Kary Moss said the group did not know about the judge's affiliation with the nonprofit but added she did not think it is a "big story."
Absolutely appalling this conflict of interest is, can't wait to hear our token Libs defend this one! :crutch:
 
OP
GotZoom

GotZoom

Senior Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2005
Messages
5,719
Reaction score
367
Points
48
Location
Cordova, TN
I wonder what would be happening if the judge approved the surveillance and it came out after that she was on the board of a foundation that contributed to the Republican party.

Never mind. We all know what would happen.
 

trobinett

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2004
Messages
1,832
Reaction score
162
Points
48
Location
Arkansas, The Ozarks
Why, I'm shocked.

I'm appalled.

I can only speak in short sentences.

Yet, why aren't I surprised?

Hmmmmmm.....:nine:
 

Hobbit

Senior Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2004
Messages
5,099
Reaction score
421
Points
48
Location
Near Atlanta, GA
I was suspicious since the first time I saw the judge's official ruling saying things about how the United States doesn't have a dictator. I just thought to myself, "Hmm, is that bias I smell?"
 

Bonnie

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2004
Messages
9,476
Reaction score
669
Points
48
Location
Wherever
Absolutely appalling this conflict of interest is, can't wait to hear our token Libs defend this one! :crutch:
C'mon now Hawk it's ALWAYS different for Libs, afterall their intentions are honorable.

Sorry I just can't keep a straight face and say that


..................:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:
 

Bonnie

Senior Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2004
Messages
9,476
Reaction score
669
Points
48
Location
Wherever

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top