Judge orders stop to Trump’s illegal and unconstitutional layoffs to federal workers

Trump knows Congress controls the purse

But Trump just decides he is not going to spend it
 
I wasn’t expecting Trump to know the part of the Constitution that gives Congress the Power of the Purse.
You, and your topic headline, are both frauds:

Oct 15 (Reuters) - A federal judge in California on Wednesday ordered President Donald Trump's administration to halt mass layoffs during a partial government shutdown while she considers claims by unions that the job cuts are illegal.

Nowhere did the judge declare the layoffs illegal or unconstitutional.
You might have known that, had you actually read the article.
.


 
Last edited:
Ever since Dem assholes got the shit kicked out of them in last November's elections they have been running to hack judges to try to stop Democracy and the will of the people.

The Supreme Court has already bitchslapped these low level local judges thinking they rule the entire country.

Ignore the illegal ruling and move on.
Even in the conservative Supreme Court, this one wouldn’t have a chance.
 
You, and your topic headline, are both frauds:

Oct 15 (Reuters) - A federal judge in California on Wednesday ordered President Donald Trump's administration to halt mass layoffs during a partial government shutdown while she considers claims by unions that the job cuts are illegal.

Nowhere did the judge declare the layoffs illegal or unconstitutional.
You might have known that, had you actually read the article.
.
Same it poster didn’t get past the headline
 
You have no factual or rational basis for this claim.
The fact that none of you have even attempted to make an argument as to why the layups are legal must tell you something.
The Nostra guy simply said that the Supreme Court is awesome, because he has nothing either. That was his argument. You got nothing either.
 
Trump knows Congress controls the purse

But Trump just decides he is not going to spend it
You spelled out the credo of Democrats, keep spending and don't mind the taxpayers not yet paying taxes will be forced to pay income taxes.
 
The fact that none of you have even attempted to make an argument as to why the layups are legal must tell you something.
The Nostra guy simply said that the Supreme Court is awesome, because he has nothing either. That was his argument. You got nothing either.
Sorry, the layoffs are legal because we have no money to pay for the employees since Schumer shut the govt down

I didn’t realize connecting the dots was hard for you
 
15th post
Whether the Prez has the Constitutional power to decline to spend money that Congress has allocated is still an open question. There is a law that prohibits it, but that law cannot trump the Constitution, and the Court has not yet ruled on the matter.

Logically, there is really no question. The Executive runs the executive departments and if he feels that the department can run properly with less money than Congress estimated, certainly he can cut back and the excess will merely go back into the treasury (or in these days, not be borrowed to cover the expense). The Prez cannot be required to, in effect, waste the taxpayers' money.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom