Judge orders stop to Trump’s illegal and unconstitutional layoffs to federal workers

[Billiejeens]

The fact that none of you have even attempted to make an argument as to why the layups are legal must tell you something.
The Nostra guy simply said that the Supreme Court is awesome, because he has nothing either. That was his argument. You got nothing either.

I might have missed it - did you state a clear reason why they are illegal?

 

[Billiejeens]

NBC News lays off 150 employees amid ratings declines and cable spinoffs -​

OMG
A Judge definitely needs to put a halt to this.
These employees have rights!

 

[Marener]

Temporary restraining orders are in place just to preserve the status quo while litigation is ongoing.

Of course, Trump authoritarians don’t want any limitations to his authority so they oppose the judiciary.

 

[Billiejeens]

This Judge literally used - these cuts have a human cost

as her reason that they violated the law.

Another DEI hire, perhaps.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I wasn’t expecting Trump to know the part of the Constitution that gives Congress the Power of the Purse.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us-judge-says-she-will-likely-block-trumps-mass-layoffs-during-government-2025-10-15/

Since when does Congress run the Executive Branch?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

This Judge literally used - these cuts have a human cost

as her reason that they violated the law.

Another DEI hire, perhaps.

She was Ketanjis study partner in "law school"

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Temporary restraining orders are in place just to preserve the status quo while litigation is ongoing.

Of course, Trump authoritarians don’t want any limitations to his authority so they oppose the judiciary.

So Trump can sign an EO limiting the power of the Judiciary right?

 

[Marener]

So Trump can sign an EO limiting the power of the Judiciary right?

Nope. EOs don’t override the constitution.

 

[Billiejeens]

She was Ketanjis study partner in "law school"

I have seen no evidence that proves otherwise.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I have seen no evidence that proves otherwise.

They have the same grasp on the law, same as Obama

 

[Nostra]

.

The judges' job is to enforce the law.

The presidents job is to faithfully execute the laws.

When the fat moron breaks the law, the judges are there to stop him.

That's how we do it, in our country. How do they do it in your shithole country?

What law did he break?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Nope. EOs don’t override the constitution.

Neither do the musings of a lone Federal Judge!

"the executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America"

 

[Marener]

Neither do the musings of a lone Federal Judge!

"the executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America"

The judges decide what is and isn’t a legal exercise of the presidents power.

That’s what the constitution says.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The judges decide what is and isn’t a legal exercise of the presidents power.

That’s what the constitution says.

Please show me where in the Constitution it says any Federal Judge can rule on powers vested in the Executive

That's like saying the President decides what Judges can rule on

 

[Marener]

Please show me where in the Constitution it says any Federal Judge can rule on powers vested in the Executive

That's like saying the President decides what Judges can rule on

Article 3 section 2.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Article 3 section 2.

....doesn't say a Federal Judge can usurp the powers vested in the Executive

 

[Marener]

....doesn't say a Federal Judge can usurp the powers vested in the Executive

Who says they are?