Why would any magistrate judge or real judge recuse himself from any determination about Trump in one instance but not in another?
Alarm Bells: Judge Who OK'd Trump Raid Recused Himself in Trump-Clinton Lawsuit
If he knew he was biased against Trump (which is clear) then the very same logic that led him to recuse himself earlier should have yielded the same result now.
Maybe an impartial judge wouldn’t have been so quick to sigh that obviously defective warrant.
From your own article here:
"They include “a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts” or prior work as a lawyer for a party involved in the case"
So we really have no idea why Rhinehardt recused himself from that 2016 case do we?
No we don't.
Therefore we don't know that he now lacks the impartialty to act in the Trump espionage matter, do we.
No we don't.
Also from your article:
I generally ignore the President-elect’s tweets, but not this one. John Lewis arguably has done more to “make America great” than any living citizen. Last August, I took my son to the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma so he could understand the kind of courage and sacrifice required to live in a democratic society. John Lewis embodies that spirit. Although I’ve never met him, he is one of my heroes.
Thank you, Robert Reich, for saying what many of us feel, “John Lewis is the conscience of America. Donald Trump doesn’t have the moral stature to kiss John Lewis’s feet.”
Or, as Joseph Welch said to Joseph McCarthy, “At long last, have you left no sense of decency?”
Now the author of this "Red State" (lol!) article accused Rhinehardt of "bashing" Trump in this old Tweet.
No he didn't.
Trump made a supreme ass of himself in regard to John Lewis and this guy simply called Trump out on it.
All in all this is NOT an unbiased article you are using.