Judge in Georgia Dismisses Three Trump Charges

[Rawley]

Dude, they're just gonna rewrite them to fix whatever it is the judge wanted corrected. This is a procedure thing, nothing more.

Dude- they failed to plead the facts that constituted the crime. This is quite a bit more than changing some adjectives. They they have to summon a new Grand Jury and then go through the whole Grand Jury process again. They then have to indict again and start the whole process over again.

You know they will not do that, because it will be months, and after the election is over.

The only think your cult is interested in is chanting "CONVICTED FELON" before the election. Be honest.

 

[Rawley]

Correct, however the Judge noted that they may not be defective on the merits, they are defective based on specificity.

That the Prosecution could refile.

WW

LOL They left out specifics of the defendants actions that constituted a crime.. The have to literally start from scratch - back to Grand Jury.

First year associate fuckup. LOL

 

[para bellum]

They they have to summon a new Grand Jury and then go through the whole Grand Jury process again. They then have to indict again and start the whole process over again.

I think that's right. The prosecutor can't just re-write the indictment. The indictment is what was handed down by the grand jury. If they want to re-indict, they have to impanel another grand jury.

 

[Lastamender]

The only sources I could find are in the tank for Democrats but nevertheless these charges have been dropped as fast as Fanni's panties, if she wears any.

Georgia judge dismisses 6 charges in Donald Trump election racketeering case as too vague

A Georgia judge dismissed six charges in the election racketeering case against Donald Trump and a handful of co-defendants as too vague.

www.usatoday.com

“They do not give the Defendants enough information to prepare their defenses intelligently, as the Defendants could have violated the Constitutions and thus the statute in dozens, if not hundreds, of distinct ways,” McAfee ruled.

 

[Crepitus]

Dude- they failed to plead the facts that constituted the crime. This is quite a bit more than changing some adjectives. They they have to summon a new Grand Jury and then go through the whole Grand Jury process again. They then have to indict again and start the whole process over again.

You know they will not do that, because it will be months, and after the election is over.

The only think your cult is interested in is chanting "CONVICTED FELON" before the election. Be honest.

Lol, you wanna get your hopes all fired up over this be my guest. It's just gonna be a letdown for you when they correct the paperwork errors.

 

[Rawley]

Lol, you wanna get your hopes all fired up over this be my guest. It's just gonna be a letdown for you when they correct the paperwork errors.

LOL Who is telling you that it is simply a "paperwork error?"

 

[scruffy]

Word on the street says that these dismissed charges mean that he won't be dismissing Fani Willis.

Fani Willis will be disbarred shortly.

Just like Kim Gardner in St Louis.

She violated federal law while in office. But it's the least of her problems.

 

[WEATHER53]

Lib loons trying to sell it as a Win

 

[BS Filter]

If anything this ruling makes me inclined to believe he knows which way he's leaning on Fani's dismissal (not that it should be hard). Why go through these motions if you're about to dismiss the prosecutor anyway?

Because it's the procedure. The judge is following the law. I know that's a difficult concept for a democrat to grasp.

 

[Independentthinker]

ATLANTA (AP) — The judge overseeing the Georgia election interference case on Wednesday dismissed some of the charges against former President Donald Trump, but many other counts in the indictment remain.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee wrote in an order that six of the counts in the indictment must be quashed, including three against Trump, the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee

Judge overseeing Georgia election interference case dismisses some of charges against Trump

The judge overseeing the Georgia election interference case has dismissed some of the charges against former President Donald Trump, but others remain. Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee wrote Wednesday in an order that six of the charges in the indictment must be quashed, including...

www.yahoo.com

Many of the charges are nothing but weaponized biased pieces of crap. All the other charges only show a two tiered justice system, one for Democrats and one for Republicans.

 

[Delldude]

Dude, they're just gonna rewrite them to fix whatever it is the judge wanted corrected. This is a procedure thing, nothing more.

If Willis is removed from the case, whoever takes the case has to decide if the case is worth pursuing.

 

[Billo_Really]

ATLANTA (AP) — The judge overseeing the Georgia election interference case on Wednesday dismissed some of the charges against former President Donald Trump, but many other counts in the indictment remain.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee wrote in an order that six of the counts in the indictment must be quashed, including three against Trump, the presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee

Judge overseeing Georgia election interference case dismisses some of charges against Trump

The judge overseeing the Georgia election interference case has dismissed some of the charges against former President Donald Trump, but others remain. Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee wrote Wednesday in an order that six of the charges in the indictment must be quashed, including...

www.yahoo.com

This is bullshit! Fuck that judge! We got the prick on a phone call trying to manipulate votes. How much more detail do you need?

 

[WEATHER53]

This is bullshit! Fuck that judge! We got the prick on a phone call trying to manipulate votes. How much more detail do you need?

An actual ability to accomplish that or an actual outcome of that
Fear faked fantasy feelings not sufficient

 

[struth]

If anything this ruling makes me inclined to believe he knows which way he's leaning on Fani's dismissal (not that it should be hard). Why go through these motions if you're about to dismiss the prosecutor anyway?

Make it so no other demafacist can step in with these political prosecutions

 

[Billo_Really]

An actual ability to accomplish that or an actual outcome of that
Fear faked fantasy feelings not sufficient

It's not a fantasy! He made the call and tried to get 11,000 votes that he did not have. When you combine that with his fake electors showing up at different precincts, that's a RICO crime.

 

[Seymour Flops]

dismissed based on the language lacking specificity on exactly how the alleged violations of oath of office are described.

.
.
.
.
View attachment 916517

The lack of specificity, as to what Trump exactly did that violated what specific criminal statute are the problem with all of these indictments. That’s why I kept asking TDS folk on here “what exactly did Trump do to violate what specific criminal statute?“

None of them, zero, were able to provide an answer. The most common response? “Read the indictment!”

Now we have from a judge that reading the indictment would not have provided the answer either.

Do you think they will be re-filed, and successfully prosecuted? So what specifically did Trump tell what officials to do that telling them to do it violated what specific criminal statute?

In case you don’t know, that’s what you had to prove to convict someone of a crime.

 

[Crepitus]

If Willis is removed from the case, whoever takes the case has to decide if the case is worth pursuing.

There are still 120+ counts even if they don't bother to rewrite the three.

 

[Delldude]

There are still 120+ counts even if they don't bother to rewrite the three.

If someone else takes the case from Willis, they have to decide whether to proceed or skip it.

 

[Crepitus]

If someone else takes the case from Willis, they have to decide whether to proceed or skip it.

That's just wishful thinking on your part. there's no chance she's being removed from the case.

 

[Rawley]

This is bullshit! Fuck that judge! We got the prick on a phone call trying to manipulate votes. How much more detail do you need?

Uh, An explanation of how the call violates the law they cite. You know, that whole pesky Due Process thingie