Tommy Tainant
Diamond Member
How have you posted without mentioning the WEF you dozy fucker ?The judge is a NY Democrat so there is a very good chance it is compromised epstein style.
Americans know Democrats are dirty
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How have you posted without mentioning the WEF you dozy fucker ?The judge is a NY Democrat so there is a very good chance it is compromised epstein style.
Americans know Democrats are dirty
Laugh at the judge leftard.Speak to the judge dickhead.
Reality is the judgeYou are not the judge of that, Weather53.
Your opinion subjectively of it means nothing to the Judge.
The Judge will punish Mr. Trump if he violates it.
Trump will violate the order because he’s a criminal who has contempt for the law.Morse free speech violations that won’t stand
Lib loons and the media are contorting Trumps disdain for these bogus proceedings into “threats” He is not endorsing the efforts against him so they want him silenced
Utter bullshit, not legal, completely illegal and ANOTHER word change to what threats or intimidation actually are
Stop being a dork. The Judge is the reality of the situation, and he rules on due process. Trump has all his rights in court. You don't get that threatening is not one of his free speech rights. Sit down.Reality is the judge
Due process same
The ONLY reason they want Trump silenced is that this whole issue is So Weak that it cannot withstand a critical assessment
It’s not Commie land just yet and I am The Judge of that.
We all know orange man bad and scary when he defends himself which you commies don’t want him to doStop being a dork. The Judge is the reality of the situation, and he rules on due process. Trump has all his rights in court. You don't get that threatening is not one of his free speech rights. Sit down.
Refer to the Judge's order. He defines it, and you have no say in the definition. Your right is to obey it.
“Attack?” You Brits are really afraid of speech when you consider it an “attack” to criticize a public official.Attacking public servants is not protected speech unless you are trump and then you are immune.
You and dopey horses don’t seem to grasp that we are free to challenge such orders.Come on John, haven't you realized the Laws of man do not apply to their Orange God.
Death threats are not protected.“Attack?” You Brits are really afraid of speech when you consider it an “attack” to criticize a public official.
In my country it is perfectly ok to verbally criticize elected officials. This is why the dopes on the left verbally abuse Trump. Because they can. It is why intelligent people criticize Biden. We can and he actually deserves it.
Show me any “death threats” ever allegedly uttered by Trump, taint.Death threats are not protected.
So... if someone calls their local DA a piece of shit for turning dangerous criminals back out onto the streets, then they're breaking the law in doing so?Attacking public servants is not protected speech unless you are trump and then you are immune.
This clown is beyond challenging.You and dopey horses don’t seem to grasp that we are free to challenge such orders.
No you’re not.This clown is beyond challenging.
Trump is.No you’re not.
You calling anyone a piece of shit for any reason is not breaking the law, but if you threaten anyone while doing so is.So... if someone calls their local DA a piece of shit for turning dangerous criminals back out onto the streets, then they're breaking the law in doing so?
That must be something new.
Did Trump threaten anyone?You calling anyone a piece of shit for any reason is not breaking the law, but if you threaten anyone while doing so is.
See on the 15th.