Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes, Biden could do that. I've mentioned that at least once on this board already. Asking why he didn't just do that. Of course, Biden cannot then demand that Trump be prosecuted for the retroactive crime of possessing documents that Biden would later classify.For once we can completely agree.
Trump should have cut the classification headings off the documents, and send them to Garland, so that DOJ would know exactly what "classified" documents Trump had in his possession.
What you didn't realize is that, if DOJ knows what documents had been "declassified" by Trump, and their classification marks sent to DOJ, they could have Biden immediately "reclassify" all the documents.
No more than if a bank robber threw the cash he stole into his laundry bag, and stashed it in his basement.The FBI and doj screwed themselves out of that intentional theft argument, by babbling endlessly about how badly the documents were arranged how they were mixed in with non-classified documents. If the documents were so jumbled, that certainly does not show intent to keep them. It seems like a classic case of extreme carelessness.
Actually there is case law where documents that were later classified, were subject to criminal prosecution. The famous case of the college student who designed an a-bomb. His paper was confiscated by the FBI.Yes, Biden could do that. I've mentioned that at least once on this board already. Asking why he didn't just do that. Of course, Biden cannot then demand that Trump be prosecuted for the retroactive crime of possessing documents that Biden would later classify.
Sorry democrats! It's just not that country yet.
No, that's you wishing all the LIES about him were true.
Oh well my goodness
www.foxnews.com
No . . . more like if the Clintons, who shipped one hundred and ninety thousand dollars worth of china and furniture from the White House to their private use, and returned some of it (link), forgot a couple of bowls they had been using for ashtrays, and had the FBI execute a raid on their house to "get them back," when the real goal of the FBI was to take pictures of White House china with dog food in it to show how horrible Hillary Clinton was so she would not run in the next election.No more than if a bank robber threw the cash he stole into his laundry bag, and stashed it in his basement.
No . . . more like if the Clintons, who shipped one hundred and ninety thousand dollars worth of china and furniture from the White House to their private use, and returned some of it (link), forgot a couple of bowls they had been using for ashtrays, and had the FBI execute a raid on their house to "get them back," when the real goal of the FBI was to take pictures of White House china with dog food in it to show how horrible Hillary Clinton was so she would not run in the next election.
Yeah. Much more like that.
“We have been informed that it is being shipped back, and the National Park Service is ready to receive it, take possession of it and take custody of it,” Jim McDaniel, the National Park Service’s liaison to the White House, said Wednesday.No . . . more like if the Clintons, who shipped one hundred and ninety thousand dollars worth of china and furniture from the White House to their private use, and returned some of it (link), forgot a couple of bowls they had been using for ashtrays, and had the FBI execute a raid on their house to "get them back," when the real goal of the FBI was to take pictures of White House china with dog food in it to show how horrible Hillary Clinton was so she would not run in the next election.
Yeah. Much more like that.
I was just thinking of that case when I posted. Yes, retroactive classification is possible, but the student was not prosecuted for possessing a design that he himself created. I don't know where you got that idea. Um, where did you get that idea?Actually there is case law where documents that were later classified, were subject to criminal prosecution. The famous case of the college student who designed an a-bomb. His paper was confiscated by the FBI.
John Aristotle Phillips - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Phillips was an underachieving student who played the tiger mascot at Princeton games. Hoping to stay at the school, he proposed a term paper for a seminar on nuclear proliferation outlining the design for an atomic bomb
Dr. Frank Chilton, a California nuclear scientist who at that time specialized in nuclear explosion engineering, said Phillips’s design was "pretty much guaranteed to work."
The Federal Bureau of Investigation confiscated Phillips's term paper and a mockup he had constructed in his dormitory room. In 1979,
It didn't. But she got off scott free.“We have been informed that it is being shipped back, and the National Park Service is ready to receive it, take possession of it and take custody of it,” Jim McDaniel, the National Park Service’s liaison to the White House, said Wednesday.
“The property is being returned to government custody until such time that the issues can be resolved. It may well turn out that that property is rightly the personal property of the Clintons.”
Bill Barr slams Trump's special master request as 'red herring' as legal battle with DOJ continues
Former Attorney General Bill Barr analyzes the legal battle between former President Trump and the Justice Department and discusses Trump's request for a special master.
