j-mac
Nuthin' but the truth
Aw, somebody upset that the scheme will now fall apart?This judge is a moron!
‘Biased And Corrupt’ Trump Judge Defied Law In Assigning Special Master: Expert
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Aw, somebody upset that the scheme will now fall apart?This judge is a moron!
‘Biased And Corrupt’ Trump Judge Defied Law In Assigning Special Master: Expert
Your ridiculous analogy leaves out that the Clintons gave a full manifest of items they had shipped to their residence, with the archivist claiming they were official gifts, and not personal gifts. And the clintons either returned or purchased at full retail the objects in question. Even the bowls and ashtrays.No . . . more like if the Clintons, who shipped one hundred and ninety thousand dollars worth of china and furniture from the White House to their private use, and returned some of it (link), forgot a couple of bowls they had been using for ashtrays, and had the FBI execute a raid on their house to "get them back," when the real goal of the FBI was to take pictures of White House china with dog food in it to show how horrible Hillary Clinton was so she would not run in the next election.
Yeah. Much more like that.
Tell Trump to go scratch his ass so he can give his nuts a break.Just like your soi boys will do...
The student wasn't prosecuted because the FBI took the classified documents without a fight. Had he tried to keep it, or retained a copy of it, he would have been prosecuted.I was just thinking of that case when I posted. Yes, retroactive classification is possible, but the student was not prosecuted for possessing a design that he himself created. I don't know where you got that idea. Um, where did you get that idea?
The DOJ would never do something that absurd to anyone but Trump.
The special master is just a delaying tactic. The FBI is fully capable of separating attorney-client material, like they did with Rudy Giuliani without a special master.That is ridiculous.
Who could possibly fault appointing a special master who can actually look at all the evidence that we are not allowed to see, and provide definitive evaluation that a judge would not be able to provide?
That is absolutely no way a highly secretive and complex legal issue like this could possibly be handled except by the appointment of a special master who will have clearance, impartiality, and technical knowledge.
To try to proceed without a special master would have been criminal.
And in fact, the search warrant already likely is criminal.
Actually there is case law where documents that were later classified, were subject to criminal prosecution. The famous case of the college student who designed an a-bomb. His paper was confiscated by the FBI.
So, what are some example of prosecution for a retroactively classified document? You said "there is case law." Cite the cases.The student wasn't prosecuted because the FBI took the classified documents without a fight. Had he tried to keep it, or retained a copy of it, he would have been prosecuted.
So, all attorney-client material has been returned? When did that happen?The special master is just a delaying tactic. The FBI is fully capable of separating attorney-client material, like they did with Rudy Giuliani without a special master.
The question is over executive privilege, which no longer belongs to Trump but to the chief executive President Biden, who has not invoked privilege, nor does he intend to.
Actually Biden, as is the Trump argument, can classify documents without telling anyone.So, what are some example of prosecution for a retroactively classified document? You said "there is case law." Cite the cases.
Not that it matters. Biden did NOT re-classify the document.
If there is any truth to this, than this is a big deal.
Why is the DNC/DOJ/FBI leaking so much information? I thought it was wrong to talk about an ongoing investigation.Now that it's leaked that one of the documents Trump had at mar-a-lago, that evaded the first search, and wasn't turned over for the subpoena, described the nuclear capabilities of a foreign nation. These are the very highest of the SCI compartments. With access granted to only a handful of people in the entire government.
Yeah . . . no. The USSC has consistently stated that all power of classification is vested in the President of the United States, along with all other executive power.This throws a monkey wrench into the judges special master order. Where are they going to find somebody who either has, or can qualify for access to nuclear capability documents.
P.S. Documents of this nature are beyond the declassification authority of the president.
Why is the DNC/DOJ/FBI leaking so much information? I thought it was wrong to talk about an ongoing investigation.
If there were "NUCLEAR SECRETS!" in the hands of the DNC, the military would be justified in immediately acting to confiscate them. They leak like a sieve and we're supposed to "trust them" while they decide how far to go in the leaking to get Trump?
Yeah . . . no. The USSC has consistently stated that all power of classification is vested in the President of the United States, along with all other executive power.
Yes, but then they government could not prove that Trump intended to keep classified documents, Biden having kept the classification secret. But he can right now declassify documents that the Chinese are offering millions to Hunter for. Hunter could make copies and sell them with no penalty.Actually Biden, as is the Trump argument, can classify documents without telling anyone.