Judge allows armed monitoring of Drop Boxes

Wrong again. Clinton shut down the government to get HIS budget through. Not Newt's.

The budget passed without a single republican vote in the senate.
Clinton was working to get more spending into the budge, moron, not less.
 
On Jan. 7, 2009, the Bush Administration Justice Department announced that it filed a civil lawsuit against the New Black Panther Party and three of its members. Specifically, they were alleged to have violated Section 11(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which prohibits intimidation, coercion or threats against "any person for voting or attempting to vote." The aims of the lawsuit were fairly limited: "The Department seeks an injunction preventing any future deployment of, or display of weapons by, New Black Panther Party members at the entrance to polling locations." In other words, the aim was to make sure they didn't do something similar again in the future. This section of the law does not subject violators to criminal penalties (fines or jail time, for example).

The Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice, which handles all racially motivated voter intimidation offenses, determined that "the facts did not constitute a prosecutable violation of the federal criminal civil rights statutes," according to testimony provided by Thomas E. Perez , Assistant Attorney General, on May 14, 2010. Justice spokeswoman Tracy Schmaler confirmed to PolitiFact that that determination not to file criminal charges was made prior to the filing of the civil case.

In other words, the decision not to pursue criminal charges was made by the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division prior to the Obama administration.

Here's the thing about the incident with the New Black Panthers. According to the judge who ruled in the AZ case just the other day what the BP's did was perfectly fine.

Then why all the complaining? If they were cool with it then, shouldn't you be good now?
 
I worked for CO as a ballot collector in 2012 so I have an advantage over you in that I know how the process works. Collected ballots are brought back to the county facility where they are screened and counted. Discrepancies are identified there.

That's the point. Most ballots are by mail, where there is absolutely no counting or checking the collection of ballots. And as you said, all the checking and verification is done upon receipt, and how they got to the election board should make no difference at all.
 
Because 2008 is pre-Trump, moron. You went off on a tangent about the judge in the AZ case.
Jeeeeeeez, stop confusing the issue. Go back and read thru the thread. You have it all wrong as always.
 
I agree, the board of elections should do it. Vote in person at a polling station and show a valid ID. Problem solved.
I see you hate our soldiers. Most of which can't report in person to a polling station because they're busy defending the very freedoms that allow elections to happen.

Do you also think our soldiers are suckers and losers?
 
I agree, the board of elections should do it. Vote in person at a polling station and show a valid ID. Problem solved.
What problem? The US doesn't have a voter fraud problem as evidenced by the 2020 election.
 
I see you hate our soldiers. Most of which can't report in person to a polling station because they're busy defending the very freedoms that allow elections to happen.

Do you also think our soldiers are suckers and losers?

I previously said there are a few exceptions, the military abroad being one but “I just don’t feel like leaving my sofa” not.
 
You have been fed a steaming pile of shyte...........and swallowed it whole.

If you don't monitor the wall, then smugglers will have no problem getting through it. It has to be monitored.

Furthermore, they should have built a concrete wall. I don't know why they build that pathetic steel fence and then chose not to monitor it. if they put sensors on it, then the border patrol could be on the spot the minute anyone started cutting on it.

Just keep this chart in mind. It's a fact that your lame excuses can't get around:

Hungary-Illegals-October.jpg
 
Because 2008 is pre-Trump, moron. You went off on a tangent about the judge in the AZ case.

Yet this was the post put to you,

Here's the thing about the incident with the New Black Panthers. According to the judge who ruled in the AZ case just the other day what the BP's did was perfectly fine.

Next time read the damn question.
You're making a fool out of yourself.
 
I didn't say a thing about the AZ judge, dumbass.

That was the post you commented on.

If you're too stupid to read and understand the post before answering, that's on you.
 
Jeeeeeeez, stop confusing the issue. Go back and read thru the thread. You have it all wrong as always.
He can't follow the thread, and blames his inability as your fault.
 
Jeeeeeeez, stop confusing the issue. Go back and read thru the thread. You have it all wrong as always.
You're the one who is confusing things. I was talking about the black panther incident, and you commented on it. Then you suddenly start whining about the judge in the AZ case.
 
That was the post you commented on.

If you're too stupid to read and understand the post before answering, that's on you.
YEs, I brought up the black panther incident in 2008 to show your hypocrisy.
 
You're the one who is confusing things. I was talking about the black panther incident, and you commented on it. Then you suddenly start whining about the judge in the AZ case.
Relax, these idiots are either making money from posting or are mentally ill.
 
Back
Top Bottom